Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

39
"The Real Game Awards" requires pay to vote, does this look legit or like a scam? (www.therealgameawards.com)
posted 1 year ago by acp_k2win 1 year ago by acp_k2win +39 / -0
Home | The Real Game Awards
Take Games Back gives gamers their voice back! Help decide the best and worst in the video game industry.
www.therealgameawards.com
20 comments share
20 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (20)
sorted by:
▲ 21 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 21 points 1 year ago +21 / -0

It's meant to be a way to deter mass vote drops, like voter id.

To be honest, I don't see a way around it as if you don't do that, you're either at the mercy of sponsors like the current game awards or you end up with gamemcgameface winning game of the year

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– BandageBandolier 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

It's meant to be a way to deter mass vote drops, like voter id.

Essentially so. It is a practical solution to the problem of vote botting. But the pay to vote implementation makes it impossible to tell from the outside if the intent is a fair award show, or just a grift to make some quick money. You have to base it on how much you trust the integrity of the show runners.

So in this particular case, the ridiculous price to vote ($1 is enough to verify ID through CC registration address and cover admin costs) and the fact I have never heard of these guys before makes the probability it's a scam way too high for me to consider supporting.

If you wanna do something like this right, you have to build a reputation as someone with integrity and history in the gaming community first, and if they can't be bothered to do that it's probably because they're just a grifter.

[Edit] finally dug through the about us section long enough to find out he's an old ScrewAttack contributor. So I have, in fact, heard of this guy before at least.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

I'm pretty sure Craig's sidescrollers videos get posted here occasionally too. I would be pretty surprised if he was scamming.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BandageBandolier 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

That's fair enough, I have only incidental knowledge of sidescrollers through razorfist, not enough to trust them implicitly but that's personal choice for everyone.

I would say that someone being politically aligned with me doesn't preclude them from being dishonest or greedy, so I still have to maintain some healthy skepticism

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

I don't blame you for being skeptical. The reason I don't think he is scamming is because it would blow up everything else he does on youtube and whatnot. It would be a pretty small payout to destroy his credibility that he depends on for his "day job". He doesn't strike me as that short sighted.

The awards may end up being a shitshow because he doesn't know what he is doing, but it wouldn't be intentional.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– truenationalist 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

If anything it's less scammy than "The Game Awards" or almost any other GameJourno (or any-Journo) stuff. It's up front, pay and get a vote.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ernsithe 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

it would blow up everything else he does on youtube and whatnot. It would be a pretty small payout to destroy his credibility

I don't even know who were talking about, but has that ever stopped any other YouTuber?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

He is a games journalist from way back when they actually cared about games. He has been around forever. He is pretty vocal about being on our side. He has been shitting on Kotaku, Ubisoft, SBI etc. consistently.

I am usually the one around here with the heavy skepticism, but this is one case where I will go against the flow. From what I have seen, Craig is way more ourguy than people like Sargon.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ernsithe 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I'm joking and not trying to cast any doubt on this guy individually. Just poking fun at the constant stream of examples of YouTubers doing self-sabotaging shit to make a couple quick bucks.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SR388-SAX 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

you end up with gamemcgameface winning game of the year

Don't forget -- there's an equally good chance of "Hitler did nothing wrong" winning.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Cyberguy64 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

So, "The Real" Game Awards are P2W?

You just can't write this stuff.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

How's that any different from the current game awards? The only difference I see is that the cost to influence the outcome is low enough to be accessible by normal people.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– MrMorden 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

I just started watching Side Scrollers not that long ago and I don’t really think it’s a scam. Craig explains why he is doing it. If you pay you can nominate and vote for the games. It’s like other people have said it’s to avoid people coming in and mass voting for something so a game like Dustborn wins GOTY and on the other end prevents having corporate sponsors brought to you by Carl’s Jr.

I personally couldn’t care about the entire concept of award shows. I play games when I get around to them and I don’t care about what’s the current thing to play. However, there is enough wrong with Keighley’s show that at least it’s something. Like apparently this year they hid who is actually the nominating and voting for the games. Now if you believe this other show is a scam or not is up to you but I think Craig is trying in good faith whether it succeeds or not.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– evilplushie 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

All awards are scams

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– yeldarb1983 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

yes and yes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ParadigmShift2070 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

30/year isn't that much different than patreon or subscriptions

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Grumman 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Assuming it's not an out-and-out scam, it's using the same logic as any proof-of-work cryptocurrency. In theory no attacker is going to make the necessary investment to subvert the awards knowing that doing so will destroy the credibility of the awards and make their investment worthless, but for some people destroying this upstart would be its own reward and be worth some amount of money.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy