I've noticed this a lot, lately, when it comes to the Abo stuff.
Like, on the TV yesterday, and Abo "activist" was yelling, "Captain Cook killed my family!"
Well no. No he did not. He didn't directly kill anybody. Nor did he introduce disease which did so.
Did his voyages indirectly lead to atrocities against Aboriginals? Sure, that's definitely arguable, but blaming the one explorer for something which happened long after his death is... Very Current Year...
Absolutely wild that this is where we are at, now.
Well, they first died of alcohol poisoning about a century after captain cook died. But then he killed them again in the afterlife! He shouted "This is George country now" as he did it. They told me all about it in the Dreamtime.
The Wikipedia page has been edited since that archive to make the reference even more blatant, but the context of the claim is the same.
All of which, in turn, comes from a New Statesman article by one author with an agenda.
And that, ladies and gents, is how you change a narrative. Put out a bullshit, "original-research" article, get it in a "reputable" publication; have it cited on Wikipedia and then have Google's AI scrape the Wiki page and present its content as undisputed "fact".
Not really anything new, tbh, We did have the same thing with the news and printed books for a while, it is just that for a moment of time the internet were free and now they will choke it like all else.
This is why the whole left-being-in-charge-of-AI thing is so goddamned frightening to me. Google already serves up a an "AI Overview" for nearly every search you - and every other person on the planet - does now. The "AI" that provides that summary is trained by, and trained on stuff exclusively produced by, the left. They are the sole deciders of what is a "credible" source, and they are building the "AI" to have the same opinion of what is "credible" as they do.
They are going to have virtually total control over what people believe is "true".
I don't know why there aren't more people on the right that are terrified right now. Thinking of how the left abuses literally every bit of power they come into, they are 100% going to use this for indoctrination, and narrative control.
Every time someone talks to me about how great AI is, I have to counter with the fact that every single mainstream "AI' tech that's being used right now are controlled by woke as fuck, retarded, and DERANGED leftists. Some of those leftists having meltdowns from Trump's win are in the very companies that tried to stop him from winning and that are helping to stupify these AIs.
The thing is, I don't know what can be done to stop these leftists from "poisoning" these AIs with this left wing ideology. I do not want to use the government to "force" them to knock it off because that would be compelled speech. For me it has to be one of two things - either ALL of it is ok (AI should be allowed to say the same things both a leftist and a conservative says) or it should be banned altogether.
But I know banning it is just gonna make it worse for us in the long run as our enemies utilize it.
The only time I've been enjoying AI is it being used to get people who would never sing a song to sing covers of random ass songs. Hearing Donald Trump sing 50 Cent's "Many Men" after narrowly missing an assassination attempt is funny as hell.
You also can’t turn off “AI Overview”, on Google search, on desktop, now…
For a while you could, but then naturally enough they killed that lol. Because of course…
Obviously you can ignore it, but the fact that it is now forced upon all users, everywhere (I believe), whether we like it or not? That’s pretty scary, too…
H.G. Wells was a utopian ecumenical state socialist
It's true.
There a movie from the 70s where Wells played by Malcom McDowell time travels to the modern world, expecting to see the worldwide socialist utopia in 1970s New York. Boy oh boy was he disappointed. It's true to his real life activity with leftist political groups and his overwhelmingly "white college chick" philosophy.
Nerds are susceptible to socialism because of the lack of "street smarts", insulated intellectual thinking and general lack of knowledge of practical human nature (hello me at age 21)
Edit-- I checked and it says he was involved with the Fabian socialists. So it's true. He was proto-woke
The movie was Time After Time and was Nicholas Meyers’ first movie… his second movie would be Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan.
Wells’ love interest in the movie was Mary Steenburgen! (Talk about typecasting!)
Otherwise - yeah, Wells was very socialist and happily supported “imperialism and colonialism” because at the time that was how you civilized the savages and brought them to the light of humanity.
What you’re seeing here is communist revisionism - like denying Hitler was socialist because it destroys their entire ideology to see what their utopian ideals yield… every, single, time.
Nerds are susceptible to socialism because of the lack of "street smarts", insulated intellectual thinking and general lack of knowledge of practical human nature (hello me at age 21)
They like it because they think a new system will give them higher value. As if the problem is how the system values them, and not how obnoxious they are.
Boo hoo. If chimps aren't technology advanced enough to give a shit about, the Tazzies were in the same tech boat, along with those stupid sentinelese.
No fire, no rights. No cheating by having a real human teach your uppity smelly nigger ass.
"Why should we miss the Passenger Pigeon?". Well, why should we miss hairless apes who would just be wildd thangs when allowed to roam cities?
find a very obscure and hardly cultural relevant Wikipedia article. something the jannies don't pay attention to. Update it so that the source is "niggers tongue my anus", and see how long it takes for Google's AI to use that as a source.
Lol, my IP address unironically got banned for "edit warring", when I tried to (anonymously) change a woke editor's claim that an Australian town is "sovereign, unceded Aboriginal land"...
So now I have to log in and/or spoof my IP address (obviously can use a VPN).
Though before that I successfully changed a few of those things, like removing the dual names in their Abo conlang (for example on pages for bridges over a river - reverting the name of the river to its European version. It's easy with obscure pages, as you point out), so believe me, this isn't my first rodeo, lol...
Just checked, my bridge edits are still there. Which very much proves your point, Heretic.
When you edit pages that the jannies/activists don't check, it's quite easy to get away with it, lol...
Someone did this with the page of an Australian (female) hockey player turned footballer turned pundit/influencer (yes, really). First they changed her nickname to "Nappies", and then when she had it changed back (because someone alerted her to it), they changed her birthdate to be nearly a decade older, lol.
Solid troll Though she sort of leaned into the "nappies" thing, afterwards, as a meme, so it worked out alright for all involved, I guess. Took it in good humour.
*Bark huts. IF that. Most of them didn't even get that far...
Though the propaganda has been so persuasive that my own parents now believe that they had agriculture, astrology, etc. (which they didn't)...
"Fields of yams", I'm now told. And "wild rice".
No one, literally no one would have believed those things, even 10-15 years ago, so it's quite astounding how quickly the "highly advanced civilization but also noble savage" myths have gained traction...
There's evidence (Wells' own politics and attitudes) of literary parallels between English colonization/imperialism of the 19th Century and the Martian invasion (superior technology, complete disregard of environment, how the ending comes about), but not of any specific instance, more of a generalization. Goolag probably took different sources with some opinion pieces thrown in, and mushed them together.
True, but in this case, that entire paragraph is sourced from the New Statesman article, which appears to be "original research". Obviously the Wiki jannie liked the sound of the argument it made, and pretty much copy-pasted the whole thing, which Goolag then quoted near-verbatim...
Yeah, it's a big problem if AI is not identifying original research by double-checking the source links. Extremely bad if it's just copy-pasting information from Wiki
So, another Yasuke stunt?
Pretty much, yeh.
I've noticed this a lot, lately, when it comes to the Abo stuff.
Like, on the TV yesterday, and Abo "activist" was yelling, "Captain Cook killed my family!"
Well no. No he did not. He didn't directly kill anybody. Nor did he introduce disease which did so.
Did his voyages indirectly lead to atrocities against Aboriginals? Sure, that's definitely arguable, but blaming the one explorer for something which happened long after his death is... Very Current Year...
Absolutely wild that this is where we are at, now.
"How are you here?"
"... ... I got bettah?"
Well, they first died of alcohol poisoning about a century after captain cook died. But then he killed them again in the afterlife! He shouted "This is George country now" as he did it. They told me all about it in the Dreamtime.
The revenant of Captain Cook rises once more to finish the task, brave of the abo to shout and prove himself to be among the living, haha
Most of the so called "atrocities" were collective punishment of a guerilla force.
You can't catch an Aboriginal Australian in their own territory, so what do you do if some of them start rapping and murdering settlers?
Especially because blacks attacked Whites first.
The "source" in question:
https://archive.is/sQT5s
The Wikipedia page has been edited since that archive to make the reference even more blatant, but the context of the claim is the same.
All of which, in turn, comes from a New Statesman article by one author with an agenda.
And that, ladies and gents, is how you change a narrative. Put out a bullshit, "original-research" article, get it in a "reputable" publication; have it cited on Wikipedia and then have Google's AI scrape the Wiki page and present its content as undisputed "fact".
Scary times.
Not really anything new, tbh, We did have the same thing with the news and printed books for a while, it is just that for a moment of time the internet were free and now they will choke it like all else.
They did this to us during GamerGate 1.0 too.
This is why the whole left-being-in-charge-of-AI thing is so goddamned frightening to me. Google already serves up a an "AI Overview" for nearly every search you - and every other person on the planet - does now. The "AI" that provides that summary is trained by, and trained on stuff exclusively produced by, the left. They are the sole deciders of what is a "credible" source, and they are building the "AI" to have the same opinion of what is "credible" as they do.
They are going to have virtually total control over what people believe is "true".
I don't know why there aren't more people on the right that are terrified right now. Thinking of how the left abuses literally every bit of power they come into, they are 100% going to use this for indoctrination, and narrative control.
Every time someone talks to me about how great AI is, I have to counter with the fact that every single mainstream "AI' tech that's being used right now are controlled by woke as fuck, retarded, and DERANGED leftists. Some of those leftists having meltdowns from Trump's win are in the very companies that tried to stop him from winning and that are helping to stupify these AIs.
The thing is, I don't know what can be done to stop these leftists from "poisoning" these AIs with this left wing ideology. I do not want to use the government to "force" them to knock it off because that would be compelled speech. For me it has to be one of two things - either ALL of it is ok (AI should be allowed to say the same things both a leftist and a conservative says) or it should be banned altogether.
But I know banning it is just gonna make it worse for us in the long run as our enemies utilize it.
The only time I've been enjoying AI is it being used to get people who would never sing a song to sing covers of random ass songs. Hearing Donald Trump sing 50 Cent's "Many Men" after narrowly missing an assassination attempt is funny as hell.
You also can’t turn off “AI Overview”, on Google search, on desktop, now…
For a while you could, but then naturally enough they killed that lol. Because of course…
Obviously you can ignore it, but the fact that it is now forced upon all users, everywhere (I believe), whether we like it or not? That’s pretty scary, too…
"My grandmother told me 'No matter what anybody tells you, War of the Worlds was inspired by Tasmanians after colonization.'"
H.G. Wells was a utopian ecumenical state socialist
It's true.
There a movie from the 70s where Wells played by Malcom McDowell time travels to the modern world, expecting to see the worldwide socialist utopia in 1970s New York. Boy oh boy was he disappointed. It's true to his real life activity with leftist political groups and his overwhelmingly "white college chick" philosophy.
Nerds are susceptible to socialism because of the lack of "street smarts", insulated intellectual thinking and general lack of knowledge of practical human nature (hello me at age 21)
Edit-- I checked and it says he was involved with the Fabian socialists. So it's true. He was proto-woke
The movie was Time After Time and was Nicholas Meyers’ first movie… his second movie would be Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan.
Wells’ love interest in the movie was Mary Steenburgen! (Talk about typecasting!)
Otherwise - yeah, Wells was very socialist and happily supported “imperialism and colonialism” because at the time that was how you civilized the savages and brought them to the light of humanity.
What you’re seeing here is communist revisionism - like denying Hitler was socialist because it destroys their entire ideology to see what their utopian ideals yield… every, single, time.
They like it because they think a new system will give them higher value. As if the problem is how the system values them, and not how obnoxious they are.
Boo hoo. If chimps aren't technology advanced enough to give a shit about, the Tazzies were in the same tech boat, along with those stupid sentinelese.
No fire, no rights. No cheating by having a real human teach your uppity smelly nigger ass.
"Why should we miss the Passenger Pigeon?". Well, why should we miss hairless apes who would just be wildd thangs when allowed to roam cities?
Mass migration is bad for native Tasmanians?
Is it also bad for native Europeans?
here's an idea for a troll op:
find a very obscure and hardly cultural relevant Wikipedia article. something the jannies don't pay attention to. Update it so that the source is "niggers tongue my anus", and see how long it takes for Google's AI to use that as a source.
Lol, my IP address unironically got banned for "edit warring", when I tried to (anonymously) change a woke editor's claim that an Australian town is "sovereign, unceded Aboriginal land"...
So now I have to log in and/or spoof my IP address (obviously can use a VPN).
Though before that I successfully changed a few of those things, like removing the dual names in their Abo conlang (for example on pages for bridges over a river - reverting the name of the river to its European version. It's easy with obscure pages, as you point out), so believe me, this isn't my first rodeo, lol...
Just checked, my bridge edits are still there. Which very much proves your point, Heretic.
When you edit pages that the jannies/activists don't check, it's quite easy to get away with it, lol...
Someone did this with the page of an Australian (female) hockey player turned footballer turned pundit/influencer (yes, really). First they changed her nickname to "Nappies", and then when she had it changed back (because someone alerted her to it), they changed her birthdate to be nearly a decade older, lol.
Solid troll Though she sort of leaned into the "nappies" thing, afterwards, as a meme, so it worked out alright for all involved, I guess. Took it in good humour.
I am so sick and tired of aboriginal shit. What did they ever do to warrant so much focus? Make mud huts? We did that thousands of years before.
*Bark huts. IF that. Most of them didn't even get that far...
Though the propaganda has been so persuasive that my own parents now believe that they had agriculture, astrology, etc. (which they didn't)...
"Fields of yams", I'm now told. And "wild rice".
No one, literally no one would have believed those things, even 10-15 years ago, so it's quite astounding how quickly the "highly advanced civilization but also noble savage" myths have gained traction...
There's evidence (Wells' own politics and attitudes) of literary parallels between English colonization/imperialism of the 19th Century and the Martian invasion (superior technology, complete disregard of environment, how the ending comes about), but not of any specific instance, more of a generalization. Goolag probably took different sources with some opinion pieces thrown in, and mushed them together.
True, but in this case, that entire paragraph is sourced from the New Statesman article, which appears to be "original research". Obviously the Wiki jannie liked the sound of the argument it made, and pretty much copy-pasted the whole thing, which Goolag then quoted near-verbatim...
Which is pretty wild, when you think about it.
Yeah, it's a big problem if AI is not identifying original research by double-checking the source links. Extremely bad if it's just copy-pasting information from Wiki