We know that there will be "Trump won because of gamergate!!" articles in the coming days, so what if we tried to mock them by turning something similar back on them.
Something like "Kamala lost because of Dustborn" or any other ultra-woke piece of media. Make them realize that stupid shit like that is why nobody likes their politics.
The left has no capacity for self introspection. They will see that claim as vindication for becoming worse, not better.
Need this on a bumper sticker
"Kamala lost because Leftists killed Peanut the squirrel."
They hate it because the aprouved Media told them it was a "far-right outrage" and they don't want the Deplorables criticizing government overreach.
Yep. I suspect there are several other goofy incidents that we could jokingly ascribe as the moment that secured the win for Trump, such as the "Skibidi Biden" sketch.
"Trump can only win against girls" is actually pretty funny
I've actually heard some people suspect that Kamala's loss coupled with Hillary's loss means the Democrats won't try to nominate a woman again for what might be decades of election cycles.
Bigoted Gamer-Bros took the presidency from a smart black middle class woman because they are all incels. - Kotaku probably
And I'd do it again too.
We could promote the idea that good videogames without the Message will keep us far quieter than their attempts at the moment. See what happens.
"Trump won because of Gamergate" is a good thing. We caught a Russian spy ring trying to penetrate DARPA. The "Russians" were actually a Saudi sponsored Hamas spy ring that was using Russian slogans and on the Russian payroll. There are enough Russian agents embedded everywhere in the US government that this opens doors for them, and the big PR agencies were taking jobs from Russia and giving them to Hamas. The PR agencies used Chinese spies to cover it up and then took money from China (and gave it to Hamas).
It really was the Rothschilds, Israelis, and America's Jewish leaders running the big Russia-to-Hamas money laundry. Apparently on orders from communists and Islamists inside the CIA.
Was there ever a good compact summary of all those findings put together?
No, the best we got was /pol/ saying "it's the Jews." That has additional meanings to anyone who knows history. Even that leaves out the other factions involved and their motivations.
I say, fuck it, take credit for it.
Trump is GamerGate.
Good. Make them fear us.
For too long the Right has shied away from embracing the lessons of Niccolo Machiavelli. They keep wanting to be loved when if you must choose only one, the correct choice is to be feared.
I disagree with that. Fear doesn't promote a stable power base. Love & Respect do.
It doesn't matter in our case because we are dealing with something akin to demons who see us deontologically evil. You can't ask that to love you.
Well ideally you aim to achieve both, but if you can't have both you need to be feared. It's the old Starship Troopers quote: all authority is derived from violence. Why? Because people are afraid to suffer violence.
I'm critiquing the right for constantly wanting to be loved and actively refusing to cultivate any sort of fear. Then they end up having no power and not learning the lesson and being completely ineffectual. If you're not feared then you represent no threat and you wield no actual power.
I don't totally disagree, but there is a misnomer. The authority of your loved ones doesn't come from their potential violence against you, but a feeling that you have disappointed them, and that you failed in your obligation to them. It hurts you to feel that way, but it is not real violence. Starship Troopers is explaining governmental authority. Moral authority still exists, and political authority can utilize both.
I accept your point, and it's still true. The right wants to be invited to the table, not understanding that they are what's for dinner.
That's a fair counter argument, but it's still the difference between soft power and hard power and if you're going to govern the state you need hard power. It's non-negotiable. I'm just frustrated with their need to simp all the time because it's a losing strategy that demonstrates they don't even understand the rules of the game.
No you're right, they are simps for defeat. Trump literally had to teach them how to win. Winning once was more than enough and they got tired of winning quickly.
If we understand love as a duty of care, then I would say hard power is required simply as a matter of protection. No one can love you if you can't protect them. Love is just requires a wise, disciplined, and righteous hard power.
Kamala lost because of Peanut.
2016 Harambe was euthanized, Trump was voted President.
2024 Peanut and Fred were euthanized, Trump was voted President.
There are no coincidences.
We have to kill lovable animals in order to ensure we get sane presidents!?
I was going for both things represent excessive overreach of power and did not need to be taken that far.
The old gods demand sacrifice.
Fort Night and Crazy Taxi mods: How male gamers used video gaming to conspire with Dark MAGA extremists to vote for racism and sexism.
Crazy Taxi mods!? Do tell me more.
They had AOC and Tampon Tim play modded Crazy Taxi with them in it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1n9Gqa-0Cp0
I feel old and blasphemied at. Also, I want more Crazy Taxi mods and full sized new cities.
Yes! By exposing the unholy trifecta of woke from Concorde, Dustborn, and Dragon Age: The Veilguard to the masses, the normies' eyes were opened across the nation as they now saw far deep the woke rot ran. This galvanized them against the left and Kamala, and urged them to throw their lot entirely behind Trump and Vance.
I don't believe that for a second, but hey, when did we ever let truth ever get in the way of a good story?
No. Dustborn is useful. Why would I want them to realise anything?
I want more of it. It was inspired by 2016. I want the 2030 version of dustborn 2.0