Whores, no contest. At the very least, they're subject to the same issues of the common man.
The most barely functional crack whore still understands the importance of personal property. Perhaps even more so than others. Compare to Seth Rogan:
You can be mad but I guess I don’t personally view my car as an extension of myself and I’ve never really felt violated any of the 15 or so times my car was broken in to. Once a guy accidentally left a cool knife in my car so if it keeps happening you might get a little treat.
It's difficult to be worse than actors. Even if journalists keep trying.
It's fake. Apparently, someone ran her pictures through some dodgy AI and then asserted that she had a porn past because the AI claimed there was 'potential similarity' between her face and that of a porn actress.
Regardless, even if she was a porn actress, Yarvin being her mentor makes me think she should have a chance at redemption. My greater objection to her is that she quit the Daily Wire because she thought that Matt Walsh was too meeeeeean to degenerates.
The original analysis compared positioning of moles on her arms and face to the porn star's along with a comparison of other facial features like the indentation under her chin and the structure of her nose and cheek bones.
She also has photos of herself from when she was around the age she allegedly did porn posted on her twitter, which was what personally was put me over the line of "it's real" since they look like the same person.
But putting that aside, what I find objectionable is that both she and Yarvin were (allegedly) doing heterodox things in 2008, yet Yarvin remains persona non grata in "respectable" institutions while she isn't. And more people on the "right" will defend a former career in porn than would defend heterodox writings on political philosophy. Richard Hanania constantly has to repudiate his past pseudonymous writings.
The original analysis compared positioning of moles on her arms and face to the porn star's along with a comparison of other facial features like the indentation under her chin and the structure of her nose and cheek bones.
I did not see that. I also think it's a little bit in bad taste, not necessarily on your part - but allow people to redeem themselves. There were Christian organizations in the Middle Ages dedicated to saving women from prostitution.
But putting that aside, what I find objectionable is that both she and Yarvin were (allegedly) doing heterodox things in 2008, yet Yarvin remains persona non grata in "respectable" institutions while she isn't. And more people on the "right" will defend a former career in porn than would defend heterodox writings on political philosophy. Richard Hanania constantly has to repudiate his past pseudonymous writings.
You're not wrong. That said, it makes perfect sense from the POV of the hypocritical establishment. A woman doing porn is no threat to them. Even child molestation isn't, which is why they are far more tolerant of that. Yarvin's heterodoxy is a threat, which is why they are not tolerant of that.
I'm all in favor of redemption: I need plenty of it myself.
And I could imagine someone with that sort of past being among the most critical of modernity. "When I was 18 why were all the adults in my life telling me I needed to 'find myself'? Why was one of the ways I could 'find myself' having sex with a stranger for money while other strangers filmed it? Why is that seen as a more 'respectable' path than getting married at 18 and starting a family?" And so on...
I'd guess it blew up because (as you mentioned in your original reply to me) she's been annoyingly critical of even the milquetoast "right". And based on other things she's said doesn't even seem to have "reformed" herself all that much.
I'm not too judgmental even on that, because like Coke needs Original, Light and Zero, we also need different packaging to appeal to different people. You may view Matt Walsh as 'milquetoast', but to most people, and to everyone we want to reach, he is a right-wing radical. In fact, to me, as a European, nearly every American is a right-wing radical, because I quite like things like mandatory vacation days, employment protection, sick leave, etc. Walsh's social positions are just common sense though.
My only problem is that she sperged out over it, because she believed her way is the only way. Whereas I believe that we should have her way and Matt Walsh's, and many others. In fact, "I love and support trans people, but" should be a last resort.
Harrison ford, like mark hammil, is a dancing monkey. Hollywood actors are not human beings. They are dancing animals we throw money at to entertain us. Unfortunately for them, these monkeys are no longer entertaining, so what good are they
Alternate headline: Harrison Ford did a lot of nasty shit at Diddy parties
I can't decide which is more valuable: the opinions of actors, or the opinions of whores?
Whores, no contest. At the very least, they're subject to the same issues of the common man.
The most barely functional crack whore still understands the importance of personal property. Perhaps even more so than others. Compare to Seth Rogan:
It's difficult to be worse than actors. Even if journalists keep trying.
Chris Rufo apparently agrees with you
It's fake. Apparently, someone ran her pictures through some dodgy AI and then asserted that she had a porn past because the AI claimed there was 'potential similarity' between her face and that of a porn actress.
Regardless, even if she was a porn actress, Yarvin being her mentor makes me think she should have a chance at redemption. My greater objection to her is that she quit the Daily Wire because she thought that Matt Walsh was too meeeeeean to degenerates.
The original analysis compared positioning of moles on her arms and face to the porn star's along with a comparison of other facial features like the indentation under her chin and the structure of her nose and cheek bones.
She also has photos of herself from when she was around the age she allegedly did porn posted on her twitter, which was what personally was put me over the line of "it's real" since they look like the same person.
But putting that aside, what I find objectionable is that both she and Yarvin were (allegedly) doing heterodox things in 2008, yet Yarvin remains persona non grata in "respectable" institutions while she isn't. And more people on the "right" will defend a former career in porn than would defend heterodox writings on political philosophy. Richard Hanania constantly has to repudiate his past pseudonymous writings.
I did not see that. I also think it's a little bit in bad taste, not necessarily on your part - but allow people to redeem themselves. There were Christian organizations in the Middle Ages dedicated to saving women from prostitution.
You're not wrong. That said, it makes perfect sense from the POV of the hypocritical establishment. A woman doing porn is no threat to them. Even child molestation isn't, which is why they are far more tolerant of that. Yarvin's heterodoxy is a threat, which is why they are not tolerant of that.
I'm all in favor of redemption: I need plenty of it myself.
And I could imagine someone with that sort of past being among the most critical of modernity. "When I was 18 why were all the adults in my life telling me I needed to 'find myself'? Why was one of the ways I could 'find myself' having sex with a stranger for money while other strangers filmed it? Why is that seen as a more 'respectable' path than getting married at 18 and starting a family?" And so on...
I'd guess it blew up because (as you mentioned in your original reply to me) she's been annoyingly critical of even the milquetoast "right". And based on other things she's said doesn't even seem to have "reformed" herself all that much.
I'm not too judgmental even on that, because like Coke needs Original, Light and Zero, we also need different packaging to appeal to different people. You may view Matt Walsh as 'milquetoast', but to most people, and to everyone we want to reach, he is a right-wing radical. In fact, to me, as a European, nearly every American is a right-wing radical, because I quite like things like mandatory vacation days, employment protection, sick leave, etc. Walsh's social positions are just common sense though.
My only problem is that she sperged out over it, because she believed her way is the only way. Whereas I believe that we should have her way and Matt Walsh's, and many others. In fact, "I love and support trans people, but" should be a last resort.
To be fair, if I were as enormous as Seth Rogan, I also wouldn't want to view anything else as an extension of myself.
Whores. They're honest with their dishonesty.
Spoiler: They are the same. Because as I will always state, Rome was right about actors.
I disagree. One is up front about sucking your cock, the other will take it up the ass but only if you get them a job.
But at the same time, they both lie for a living.
"I never said actors were cattle, I said they should be treated like cattle."
Yes, cattle are useful.
Whores, though the opinions of actors can also be valuable if you take them and then do the exact opposite.
Harrison ford, like mark hammil, is a dancing monkey. Hollywood actors are not human beings. They are dancing animals we throw money at to entertain us. Unfortunately for them, these monkeys are no longer entertaining, so what good are they
Let's ask Harrison Ford what he thinks about this
I need to know what Ja Rule thinks about it
Harrison banged all the Hollywood Jews before it was cool.
He's one of them
Everyone knows what he did to the underage Carrie Fisher.
Especially Mark. He knew it was happening, and did nothing.
Everyone agrees not to talk about it... unless Harrison steps out of line.
Never heard that before, care to tell me?
Wow. There's regular Early Life and then there's: