The vast majority of American men have no issue with electing a female president...
I'm not one of them. If the correct woman comes along, sure, I'll make an exception.
But I have no reservations whatsoever about saying men are better leaders than women, and most women should, under no circumstances, be allowed near the levers of power.
This is indeed an excellent, excellent ad, though. And, yeah, RFK has been doing fucking work, and his ads have been absolutely on point. Let's fucking go!
I think the raw numbers game of it all is reason enough to just offhandedly dismiss the possibility of female leadership outright. Allowing exceptions means you're likely to allow more mistakes through, which ends up being a net negative in my estimation.
Profiling like that goes against any reasonable standard under which a tolerable society can function. There is no individual who can't be unfairly discriminated against under some category they share.
Well that's just silly because you intentionally miss out on excellent candidates.
All you do is set a standard and don't move it.
Women are allowed to play in the NFL. At no point has the NFL changed their fitness standards to allow women to play on football teams. There remains no women at the professional level.
Should an Amazonian appear, then maybe she can play. Simple As.
Well that's just silly because you intentionally miss out on excellent candidates.
I am intentionally missing out on the certainty of catastrophic candidates. A few exceptions do not outweigh the costs of ignoring reality. Women are not suited to lead nations. Full stop.
The standard is "no women". But sure, keep telling me I'm "objectively wrong" because I refuse to ignore reality while you advocate for your utopian fantasy world where women don't behave like women.
I don't think it's silly as keeping standards has proven to be anything but easy. But it's worth noting one of the Judges in Israel's turbulent period was a woman named Deborah. Maybe a Margaret Thatcher type.
Yes, probably. The stormfags tell me that updoots don't matter, but they absolutely use bots and alts to updoot themselves and downdoot me. It is one of the many reasons that they are Leftist faggots.
Honestly, while I know why Kennedy wasn't VP on the ticket I still think it's a shame, because he'd have gotten some work done. I'm not Vance's biggest fan for several reasons.
She's stupid, but she's also a bit of a psychopath that lusts over the violence in power.
I admit I personally underestimated her, when this all started. She was clearly stupid, but I wasn't sure if she was evil or not. I don't think she's evil in the same way Hillary Clinton is, but she is evil, and I admittedly didn't recognize that at first. I think she's more stupid than she is evil, but it's important to acknowledge that she definitely is still evil.
Also, "psychopath" is a good description. Her brand of evil definitely trends more toward the insane and power-hungry brand, than some of the more "pure" applications of evil. She's selfish and greedy, primarily. That lends itself towards evil, but she's not quite that same level of bloodthirsty as some other evildoers. It's up to the individual to decide which is worse, but there's certainly a distinction.
I assumed she was evil because Clinton vouched for her. It was clear she was supposed to be groomed as the heir apparent in 2020. I'd also seen most of these videos back before Tulsi blew up her campaign.
I'm not one of them. If the correct woman comes along, sure, I'll make an exception.
But I have no reservations whatsoever about saying men are better leaders than women, and most women should, under no circumstances, be allowed near the levers of power.
This is indeed an excellent, excellent ad, though. And, yeah, RFK has been doing fucking work, and his ads have been absolutely on point. Let's fucking go!
There's some leaders that could work, but I don't see any Queen Victoria's or Elizabeth's around.
I think the raw numbers game of it all is reason enough to just offhandedly dismiss the possibility of female leadership outright. Allowing exceptions means you're likely to allow more mistakes through, which ends up being a net negative in my estimation.
Profiling like that goes against any reasonable standard under which a tolerable society can function. There is no individual who can't be unfairly discriminated against under some category they share.
I've had competent and respectable female bosses.
Are you willing to gamble away your entire civilization on that rarity?
Barring women from positions of leadership has been the norm for millennia and there have been plenty of flourishing societies during that time.
So were human sacrifices.
As I said:
At this point I'm thinking we should get back to doing those as well.
Nothing good ever came from them.
Well that's just silly because you intentionally miss out on excellent candidates.
All you do is set a standard and don't move it.
Women are allowed to play in the NFL. At no point has the NFL changed their fitness standards to allow women to play on football teams. There remains no women at the professional level.
Should an Amazonian appear, then maybe she can play. Simple As.
I am intentionally missing out on the certainty of catastrophic candidates. A few exceptions do not outweigh the costs of ignoring reality. Women are not suited to lead nations. Full stop.
You're still objectively wrong, and all you have to do is have standards.
The standard is "no women". But sure, keep telling me I'm "objectively wrong" because I refuse to ignore reality while you advocate for your utopian fantasy world where women don't behave like women.
I don't need to. I just have a set of standards.
I don't think it's silly as keeping standards has proven to be anything but easy. But it's worth noting one of the Judges in Israel's turbulent period was a woman named Deborah. Maybe a Margaret Thatcher type.
Do you have a bot that follows you and automatically downvotes you every time you post? I only ever see you with a -1.
He's literally +4/-0 three comments up this chain.
Yes, probably. The stormfags tell me that updoots don't matter, but they absolutely use bots and alts to updoot themselves and downdoot me. It is one of the many reasons that they are Leftist faggots.
Oh get over yourself. No they don't.
Sure jan. Why would a socialist not be petty?
Honestly, while I know why Kennedy wasn't VP on the ticket I still think it's a shame, because he'd have gotten some work done. I'm not Vance's biggest fan for several reasons.
You could see her love for violent power and coercion.
This is the true reason why she's dangerous. She's stupid, but she's also a bit of a psychopath that lusts over the violence in power.
If she were elected, expect a lot more Jan6'ers to die in prison, and a hell of a lot more lawfare.
I admit I personally underestimated her, when this all started. She was clearly stupid, but I wasn't sure if she was evil or not. I don't think she's evil in the same way Hillary Clinton is, but she is evil, and I admittedly didn't recognize that at first. I think she's more stupid than she is evil, but it's important to acknowledge that she definitely is still evil.
Also, "psychopath" is a good description. Her brand of evil definitely trends more toward the insane and power-hungry brand, than some of the more "pure" applications of evil. She's selfish and greedy, primarily. That lends itself towards evil, but she's not quite that same level of bloodthirsty as some other evildoers. It's up to the individual to decide which is worse, but there's certainly a distinction.
I assumed she was evil because Clinton vouched for her. It was clear she was supposed to be groomed as the heir apparent in 2020. I'd also seen most of these videos back before Tulsi blew up her campaign.
to do some cringe pop culture references, hillary is cersei evil. harris is danaerys evil.
jesus, that "swing of her pen" comment.