I expect an apology for Republicans and Rightists claiming that JD Vance wasn't a good choice. I told you that he is our guy and he's fucking showing it.
I will admit I thought there were better picks among the field. But as soon as he started laying into the media with precise fire (I guess what do you expect from a Marine?), I immediately realized what the point was and that it was indeed a wise choice. Unlike the Dems who are now finding out that maybe rejecting Shapiro because "Der Juden" in favor of one of the most radical governors in the country was one of the worst mistakes they could have made.
Unlike the Dems who are now finding out that maybe rejecting Shapiro because "Der Juden" in favor of one of the most radical governors in the country was one of the worst mistakes they could have made.
Shapiro covered up a murder by a fellow Jewish guy in PA. The story was blasted on the internet at the 11th hour of the VP process. Technically Kamala also did the same thing in CA, so that might've made them an even better match, but the Rebecca Zahau case has way more plausible deniability than the Ellen Greenburg case where Greenburg getting stabbed 10 times in the back of the head and neck was ruled a suicide.
Oh, I am not denying that would have hurt him once it got out. But Shapiro had a reputation (even if it is a lie) of being a "moderate" governor who did have actual popularity in PA. Unlike Walz who brings literally nothing to the table other than doubling down on the radical wing of the party.
The Vice President doesn't really contribute to adding votes... unless you have one that's so good he can actually bring them along by addressing them directly. He hit the media strong, but then invited everyone else in and did it with a bit of grace.
Grace is not the technique of a Marine, but JD's pretty damned good.
As an Ohioan who put my credibility on the line telling family members to vote for him in the Senate primary a couple years back, I am feeling pretty good right now.
Because he wasn't a Good Ol' Party Boy like Pence, a line of leaches looking for a publicity bump for book deals, the worst of the worst of politicians
I think my way forward IRL with dedicated Trump-haters is to pivot to Vance, with this debate doing some service after cutting up out some sound bites.
He's reasonably young, well spoken, well articulated, and, well, not Trump.
Their brains are completely fused off by the constant barrage of anti-Trump rhetoric and lies. "Does this thing Vance say sound unreasonable?" "POTUS doesn't create law, Congress does. Wouldn't you want him as President of the Senate instead of that faggot Walz?"
This is why I'll predict this debate moves the needle quite a bit toward the R.
Some will say they're worried about Trump's 'temperament', but reassured that Vance will take over after impeachment if Trump runs amok. Instead of the 'fear factor' VP to ward off impeachment he's picked a guy that brings in new voters rooting for impeachment.
And others will say here's this obviously nice, smart, decent guy who's vouching for Trump and they'll say, well, if that guy can get behind Trump then I can too. RFK and Tulsi have that as well, but they've already been character assassinated by the media whereas that's been more difficult to do with Vance and especially after this debate.
They’ve spent so much time, money, and energy demonizing Trump as Hitler 2.0 that it will actually be difficult to transfer that baggage onto the next big conservative leader.
They did it for every single righty since WW2 except Eisenhower, and only because calling the general who fought the Nazis a Nazi is too retarded for normies to absorb.
It'll continue until Hitler fades to myth and the magic spell no longer works on the younger generations.
When I say "our guy" I mean for the dissident right generally.
I know that what you mean is for white people as a collective. Let me be clear: even for your definition, JD Vance is your guy because his effort to help working class whites is genuine and measurable. No one else is out to directly help them.
No one in the entire field of politics really gives a shit about anything except his ambition.
You can never just 'vote' and assume that things are going to work out. Unfortunately, because the one thing I want is to not have to deal with politics. Wouldn't it be great to have a system where no matter who's in office, he can't screw with you, and just takes care of the ship of state?
Then you don't understand why people don't like JD Vance. He's a tradcuck. He believes men should be enslaved to the State and to Women for "mah babies". He'll punish men for not enslaving themselves to women and refuse to force women to improve themselves nor make the situation better for men such that men have incentive to have children. If there's anyone who will table a tax on single people, it'll be JD Vance.
lol, speaking of, he tried posting about that recent Reddit thread calling having a family a fetish over on the "Funny" board.
Now first off, /Funny isn't funny most of the time so his post going down like a lead balloon is ironically not out of place there.
Second, to the surprise of nobody those who knows how the posts he still rants about the usual crap* regardless of what the topic might be. Even when he's the one making a thread about something.
Third, as is tradition he got downvoted to oblivion for continuing to be completely retarded.
Edit: Some highlights of what "the usual crap" is when in a thread about families having children.
wanting that many kids is a fetish
This is at least on topic. The rest however...
handshake
Because he still doesn't understand how the site as a whole works.
Melinda
Because why the fuck not? ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Could you fit any more buzzwords in there?
The irony of this considering what follows is as the kids say: "peak".
"trans agenda"
JK Rowling
TERFism
All of those from the same post, mind.
Yawn...
One of his typical deflections.
tl;dr he treats every single poster he replies to as both a brand new person, "handshakes", and yet as if it's someone who would know the ins and outs of all the random colloquialisms he repeatedly uses over and over, "Melinda", "Yawn", and more.
So he's still as unhinged as ever.
Funny thing is I didn't even realise it was him posting that thread when I saw it at first. I just found both the post and OP comments to be retarded and downvoted both as such. Then the reason for it being retarded become apparent when I took a second look whom the OP was.
Also, you're not going to be enslaved to women. You get to choose if you want to be married. This is like the right wing version of the reaction to Jordan Peterson's "enforced monogamy"
Sen. JD Vance has a history of making disparaging remarks toward people without children, a CNN KFile review of his comments shows, including fundraising off his now-infamous “childless cat lady” remarks in a series of emails that called Democratic leaders “childless sociopaths” who “don’t have a direct stake in this country.”
In November 2020, Vance said on a conservative podcast that childless Americans, especially those in the country’s “leadership class,” were “more sociopathic” than those with children and made the country “less mentally stable.” Vance added that the “most deranged” and “most psychotic” commentators on Twitter – now known as X - were typically childless.
Vance, adding that his remarks were not about criticizing people without children, but rather focused on policy and claimed the Democratic Party has become “anti-family” and “anti-child.”
“There are just these basic cadences of life that I think are really powerful and really valuable when you have kids in your life,” Vance said in November 2020 on a conservative podcast. “And the fact that so many people, especially in America’s leadership class, just don’t have that in their lives.”
“You know, I worry that it makes people more sociopathic and ultimately our whole country a little bit less, less mentally stable,” he said. “And of course, you talk about going on Twitter – final point I’ll make is you go on Twitter and almost always the people who are most deranged and most psychotic are people who don’t have kids at home.”
In another tweet a month later, Vance wrote, “Our country’s low birth rates have made many elites sociopaths.”
Vance spokesperson Taylor Van Kirk said, “As [Senator Vance] has clearly stated, he was talking about politicians on the left who support policies that are explicitly anti-child and anti-family. The media can obsess over it all they want, but he’s not going to back down when it comes to advocating for policies that protect parental rights and encourage people to have more kids.”
The writing is on the wall. Enjoy slaving away for women! There's no way in hell some dude who married an Indian woman is going to promote patriarchal values to help promote the family and kids. He's going to extract every last resource he can from men to give to his precious women. The fact some of you can't see that is ridiculous.
Men are going to get fucked over no matter who gets elected.
The definition of tradcuck is someone who promotes traditional family values but does so in a manner that benefits women to the detriment of men. His words reveal he cares about traditional family values (having children) and I am making the assumption, he likely will promote these in a manner that is pro-women and anti-men. It is speculation but I think it's good speculation. Usually, the men in modernity who see married men as superior to unmarried men are almost always cucks. I've seen it a million times already on CuckPro.
I expect an apology for Republicans and Rightists claiming that JD Vance wasn't a good choice. I told you that he is our guy and he's fucking showing it.
I will admit I thought there were better picks among the field. But as soon as he started laying into the media with precise fire (I guess what do you expect from a Marine?), I immediately realized what the point was and that it was indeed a wise choice. Unlike the Dems who are now finding out that maybe rejecting Shapiro because "Der Juden" in favor of one of the most radical governors in the country was one of the worst mistakes they could have made.
Shapiro covered up a murder by a fellow Jewish guy in PA. The story was blasted on the internet at the 11th hour of the VP process. Technically Kamala also did the same thing in CA, so that might've made them an even better match, but the Rebecca Zahau case has way more plausible deniability than the Ellen Greenburg case where Greenburg getting stabbed 10 times in the back of the head and neck was ruled a suicide.
Oh, I am not denying that would have hurt him once it got out. But Shapiro had a reputation (even if it is a lie) of being a "moderate" governor who did have actual popularity in PA. Unlike Walz who brings literally nothing to the table other than doubling down on the radical wing of the party.
The Vice President doesn't really contribute to adding votes... unless you have one that's so good he can actually bring them along by addressing them directly. He hit the media strong, but then invited everyone else in and did it with a bit of grace.
Grace is not the technique of a Marine, but JD's pretty damned good.
Not necessarily, but the VP candidate needs to at least appear to be capable of assuming the role of President. Walz does not.
...With a proven record for being a fabulist
As an Ohioan who put my credibility on the line telling family members to vote for him in the Senate primary a couple years back, I am feeling pretty good right now.
Frankly, I'm more upset with the Republican GOP who for underselling him so badly.
Because he wasn't a Good Ol' Party Boy like Pence, a line of leaches looking for a publicity bump for book deals, the worst of the worst of politicians
I think my way forward IRL with dedicated Trump-haters is to pivot to Vance, with this debate doing some service after cutting up out some sound bites.
He's reasonably young, well spoken, well articulated, and, well, not Trump.
Their brains are completely fused off by the constant barrage of anti-Trump rhetoric and lies. "Does this thing Vance say sound unreasonable?" "POTUS doesn't create law, Congress does. Wouldn't you want him as President of the Senate instead of that faggot Walz?"
Dunno if it'll work, but it's a last-ditch thing.
Vance is clearly aware of how to manage people's feelings, and definitely came across with a "I used to be like you once" attitude.
This is why I'll predict this debate moves the needle quite a bit toward the R.
Some will say they're worried about Trump's 'temperament', but reassured that Vance will take over after impeachment if Trump runs amok. Instead of the 'fear factor' VP to ward off impeachment he's picked a guy that brings in new voters rooting for impeachment.
And others will say here's this obviously nice, smart, decent guy who's vouching for Trump and they'll say, well, if that guy can get behind Trump then I can too. RFK and Tulsi have that as well, but they've already been character assassinated by the media whereas that's been more difficult to do with Vance and especially after this debate.
They’ve spent so much time, money, and energy demonizing Trump as Hitler 2.0 that it will actually be difficult to transfer that baggage onto the next big conservative leader.
It will be difficult, but they will still try. The left can't win on the issues, so control through fear is the only arrow they have in the quiver.
They did it for every single righty since WW2 except Eisenhower, and only because calling the general who fought the Nazis a Nazi is too retarded for normies to absorb.
It'll continue until Hitler fades to myth and the magic spell no longer works on the younger generations.
I think we have very different definitions of what that term means, but I'll grant you that he seems to have some fight in the debate ring.
When I say "our guy" I mean for the dissident right generally.
I know that what you mean is for white people as a collective. Let me be clear: even for your definition, JD Vance is your guy because his effort to help working class whites is genuine and measurable. No one else is out to directly help them.
We'll have to settle for agreeing on this point. No one in the entire field of politics seems to really give a shit about White people.
No one in the entire field of politics really gives a shit about anything except his ambition.
You can never just 'vote' and assume that things are going to work out. Unfortunately, because the one thing I want is to not have to deal with politics. Wouldn't it be great to have a system where no matter who's in office, he can't screw with you, and just takes care of the ship of state?
Then you don't understand why people don't like JD Vance. He's a tradcuck. He believes men should be enslaved to the State and to Women for "mah babies". He'll punish men for not enslaving themselves to women and refuse to force women to improve themselves nor make the situation better for men such that men have incentive to have children. If there's anyone who will table a tax on single people, it'll be JD Vance.
calm down imp
lol, speaking of, he tried posting about that recent Reddit thread calling having a family a fetish over on the "Funny" board.
Now first off, /Funny isn't funny most of the time so his post going down like a lead balloon is ironically not out of place there.
Second, to the surprise of nobody
thosewho knows howthe posts he still rants about the usual crap* regardless of what the topic might be. Even when he's the one making a thread about something.Third, as is tradition he got downvoted to oblivion for continuing to be completely retarded.
https://communities.win/c/Funny/p/1995H1ADJ5/its-a-fetish-you-fucking-losers-/c
Edit: Some highlights of what "the usual crap" is when in a thread about families having children.
This is at least on topic. The rest however...
Because he still doesn't understand how the site as a whole works.
Because why the fuck not? ¯_(ツ)_/¯
The irony of this considering what follows is as the kids say: "peak".
All of those from the same post, mind.
One of his typical deflections.
tl;dr he treats every single poster he replies to as both a brand new person, "handshakes", and yet as if it's someone who would know the ins and outs of all the random colloquialisms he repeatedly uses over and over, "Melinda", "Yawn", and more.
So he's still as unhinged as ever.
Funny thing is I didn't even realise it was him posting that thread when I saw it at first. I just found both the post and OP comments to be retarded and downvoted both as such. Then the reason for it being retarded become apparent when I took a second look whom the OP was.
He also made a whole community just to summon me there.
https://scored.co/c/TheCultureWar/p/17txoa4Bj5/the-feminist-regime-is-installed/c
He's gotten nuttier and nuttier since 10/7.
He's literally not a tradcuck, but okay.
Also, you're not going to be enslaved to women. You get to choose if you want to be married. This is like the right wing version of the reaction to Jordan Peterson's "enforced monogamy"
The writing is on the wall. Enjoy slaving away for women! There's no way in hell some dude who married an Indian woman is going to promote patriarchal values to help promote the family and kids. He's going to extract every last resource he can from men to give to his precious women. The fact some of you can't see that is ridiculous.
Men are going to get fucked over no matter who gets elected.
You posted that as if I didn't agree with it.
No. JD Vance is not a tradcuck, he just wants people to have children instead of us dying on a civilizational demographic bomb.
The definition of tradcuck is someone who promotes traditional family values but does so in a manner that benefits women to the detriment of men. His words reveal he cares about traditional family values (having children) and I am making the assumption, he likely will promote these in a manner that is pro-women and anti-men. It is speculation but I think it's good speculation. Usually, the men in modernity who see married men as superior to unmarried men are almost always cucks. I've seen it a million times already on CuckPro.