I expect an apology for Republicans and Rightists claiming that JD Vance wasn't a good choice. I told you that he is our guy and he's fucking showing it.
I will admit I thought there were better picks among the field. But as soon as he started laying into the media with precise fire (I guess what do you expect from a Marine?), I immediately realized what the point was and that it was indeed a wise choice. Unlike the Dems who are now finding out that maybe rejecting Shapiro because "Der Juden" in favor of one of the most radical governors in the country was one of the worst mistakes they could have made.
Unlike the Dems who are now finding out that maybe rejecting Shapiro because "Der Juden" in favor of one of the most radical governors in the country was one of the worst mistakes they could have made.
Shapiro covered up a murder by a fellow Jewish guy in PA. The story was blasted on the internet at the 11th hour of the VP process. Technically Kamala also did the same thing in CA, so that might've made them an even better match, but the Rebecca Zahau case has way more plausible deniability than the Ellen Greenburg case where Greenburg getting stabbed 10 times in the back of the head and neck was ruled a suicide.
Oh, I am not denying that would have hurt him once it got out. But Shapiro had a reputation (even if it is a lie) of being a "moderate" governor who did have actual popularity in PA. Unlike Walz who brings literally nothing to the table other than doubling down on the radical wing of the party.
The Vice President doesn't really contribute to adding votes... unless you have one that's so good he can actually bring them along by addressing them directly. He hit the media strong, but then invited everyone else in and did it with a bit of grace.
Grace is not the technique of a Marine, but JD's pretty damned good.
As an Ohioan who put my credibility on the line telling family members to vote for him in the Senate primary a couple years back, I am feeling pretty good right now.
Because he wasn't a Good Ol' Party Boy like Pence, a line of leaches looking for a publicity bump for book deals, the worst of the worst of politicians
I think my way forward IRL with dedicated Trump-haters is to pivot to Vance, with this debate doing some service after cutting up out some sound bites.
He's reasonably young, well spoken, well articulated, and, well, not Trump.
Their brains are completely fused off by the constant barrage of anti-Trump rhetoric and lies. "Does this thing Vance say sound unreasonable?" "POTUS doesn't create law, Congress does. Wouldn't you want him as President of the Senate instead of that faggot Walz?"
This is why I'll predict this debate moves the needle quite a bit toward the R.
Some will say they're worried about Trump's 'temperament', but reassured that Vance will take over after impeachment if Trump runs amok. Instead of the 'fear factor' VP to ward off impeachment he's picked a guy that brings in new voters rooting for impeachment.
And others will say here's this obviously nice, smart, decent guy who's vouching for Trump and they'll say, well, if that guy can get behind Trump then I can too. RFK and Tulsi have that as well, but they've already been character assassinated by the media whereas that's been more difficult to do with Vance and especially after this debate.
They’ve spent so much time, money, and energy demonizing Trump as Hitler 2.0 that it will actually be difficult to transfer that baggage onto the next big conservative leader.
They did it for every single righty since WW2 except Eisenhower, and only because calling the general who fought the Nazis a Nazi is too retarded for normies to absorb.
It'll continue until Hitler fades to myth and the magic spell no longer works on the younger generations.
When I say "our guy" I mean for the dissident right generally.
I know that what you mean is for white people as a collective. Let me be clear: even for your definition, JD Vance is your guy because his effort to help working class whites is genuine and measurable. No one else is out to directly help them.
No one in the entire field of politics really gives a shit about anything except his ambition.
You can never just 'vote' and assume that things are going to work out. Unfortunately, because the one thing I want is to not have to deal with politics. Wouldn't it be great to have a system where no matter who's in office, he can't screw with you, and just takes care of the ship of state?
Honestly, in terms of intelligence, he is about the baseline for what we should expect from every politician. We somehow normalized senior citizens and dumb bitches and forgot what smart people sound like.
Trump is sharp for his age but even he is on the decline.
I expect an apology for Republicans and Rightists claiming that JD Vance wasn't a good choice. I told you that he is our guy and he's fucking showing it.
I will admit I thought there were better picks among the field. But as soon as he started laying into the media with precise fire (I guess what do you expect from a Marine?), I immediately realized what the point was and that it was indeed a wise choice. Unlike the Dems who are now finding out that maybe rejecting Shapiro because "Der Juden" in favor of one of the most radical governors in the country was one of the worst mistakes they could have made.
Shapiro covered up a murder by a fellow Jewish guy in PA. The story was blasted on the internet at the 11th hour of the VP process. Technically Kamala also did the same thing in CA, so that might've made them an even better match, but the Rebecca Zahau case has way more plausible deniability than the Ellen Greenburg case where Greenburg getting stabbed 10 times in the back of the head and neck was ruled a suicide.
Oh, I am not denying that would have hurt him once it got out. But Shapiro had a reputation (even if it is a lie) of being a "moderate" governor who did have actual popularity in PA. Unlike Walz who brings literally nothing to the table other than doubling down on the radical wing of the party.
The Vice President doesn't really contribute to adding votes... unless you have one that's so good he can actually bring them along by addressing them directly. He hit the media strong, but then invited everyone else in and did it with a bit of grace.
Grace is not the technique of a Marine, but JD's pretty damned good.
Not necessarily, but the VP candidate needs to at least appear to be capable of assuming the role of President. Walz does not.
...With a proven record for being a fabulist
As an Ohioan who put my credibility on the line telling family members to vote for him in the Senate primary a couple years back, I am feeling pretty good right now.
Frankly, I'm more upset with the Republican GOP who for underselling him so badly.
Because he wasn't a Good Ol' Party Boy like Pence, a line of leaches looking for a publicity bump for book deals, the worst of the worst of politicians
I think my way forward IRL with dedicated Trump-haters is to pivot to Vance, with this debate doing some service after cutting up out some sound bites.
He's reasonably young, well spoken, well articulated, and, well, not Trump.
Their brains are completely fused off by the constant barrage of anti-Trump rhetoric and lies. "Does this thing Vance say sound unreasonable?" "POTUS doesn't create law, Congress does. Wouldn't you want him as President of the Senate instead of that faggot Walz?"
Dunno if it'll work, but it's a last-ditch thing.
Vance is clearly aware of how to manage people's feelings, and definitely came across with a "I used to be like you once" attitude.
This is why I'll predict this debate moves the needle quite a bit toward the R.
Some will say they're worried about Trump's 'temperament', but reassured that Vance will take over after impeachment if Trump runs amok. Instead of the 'fear factor' VP to ward off impeachment he's picked a guy that brings in new voters rooting for impeachment.
And others will say here's this obviously nice, smart, decent guy who's vouching for Trump and they'll say, well, if that guy can get behind Trump then I can too. RFK and Tulsi have that as well, but they've already been character assassinated by the media whereas that's been more difficult to do with Vance and especially after this debate.
They’ve spent so much time, money, and energy demonizing Trump as Hitler 2.0 that it will actually be difficult to transfer that baggage onto the next big conservative leader.
It will be difficult, but they will still try. The left can't win on the issues, so control through fear is the only arrow they have in the quiver.
They did it for every single righty since WW2 except Eisenhower, and only because calling the general who fought the Nazis a Nazi is too retarded for normies to absorb.
It'll continue until Hitler fades to myth and the magic spell no longer works on the younger generations.
I think we have very different definitions of what that term means, but I'll grant you that he seems to have some fight in the debate ring.
When I say "our guy" I mean for the dissident right generally.
I know that what you mean is for white people as a collective. Let me be clear: even for your definition, JD Vance is your guy because his effort to help working class whites is genuine and measurable. No one else is out to directly help them.
We'll have to settle for agreeing on this point. No one in the entire field of politics seems to really give a shit about White people.
No one in the entire field of politics really gives a shit about anything except his ambition.
You can never just 'vote' and assume that things are going to work out. Unfortunately, because the one thing I want is to not have to deal with politics. Wouldn't it be great to have a system where no matter who's in office, he can't screw with you, and just takes care of the ship of state?
Honestly, in terms of intelligence, he is about the baseline for what we should expect from every politician. We somehow normalized senior citizens and dumb bitches and forgot what smart people sound like.
Trump is sharp for his age but even he is on the decline.
That's fair, and honestly, JD Vance wasn't trying to sound smart.