Women ruined Scientific American
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
Used to enjoy this magazine along with Nat Geo. I remember scratching my head and wondering how these articles are considered science. Like them commenting on Floyd riots
The BLM and Antifa riots are very scientific and insightful... for the study of mass formation psychosis.
I agree but that wasn’t the science they were after. Also the behavior of the media would make for a great study
harvard chan top medical school PROUDLY released a statement saying “since racism is a medical health emergency rioting is justified during a pandemic “
clearly very little science happens at our top universities these days
And of course nobody had the guts to ask her how that is scientific. I would’ve asked her how Covid seems to know when you are protesting for certain causes
BLM also had strange covid-immunity clouds surrounding their rallys. "Don't meet other people and form groups, except for BLM of course. That's totally fine."
National Geographic is wholesale proglodyte propaganda. Soft science, like the 'Sci-Fi Channel' turning into the 'Syfy Channel'.They should call it 'Natty Geographs' or something.
Near and dear to my heart. I was 10 going on 11 when sci-fi channel debuted. It was originally intended to appeal to nerds/sci-fi fans. That isn’t their mission anymore
Idk, I was rewatching eureka and damn is there a lot of political cringe, boss mommy fantasies, and just low iq drivel. There’s still some good moments and fun, but is did not age well at all.
I didn’t mind it but I watched it when it came out before I got sick of “the message” and the usual stuff we see all over. 90s sci-fi channel was great. I learned about a lot of classic shows like Night Gallery, Dark Shadows, Starman, 80s TZ, original Outer Limits, and more. One of my favorite shows was a Saturday morning show where they would interview classic sci fi authors
It would confuse the Scots if they called it that.
"So do you know where Paisley is or not?"
>Experts say it is safe to protest as long as you're not protesting the lockdowns.
And Time had that article explaining how despite all the talk about how dangerous large gatherings were the blm protests somehow were not spreading covid.
"Here we see the Monarch butterfly gracefully circling a nectar source before feeding off it...like how white men feed off racism and bigotry..."
Sadly I don’t know if you are actually quoting an article or if it’s satire
I remember a few years ago my doctor had Nat Geo and similar local magazines in the waiting room. They're all full of leftist trash now. Even my local Nat Geo website here in Germany has an anti-Trump article on the frontpage.
How did they justify an anti-Trump article as science?
Basically a "how can he keep getting away with it?" article decrying that politicians like Trump are immune to the left's accusations because his supporters stopped believing them. Including the usual rehashing of "muh convicted felon" and Jan 6th.
The same way they tell you it's "science" that men are women, and IQ tests/crime stats don't correlate with anything ever.