From what I've heard the reason for the hatians flooding springfield is some factory wanting them for cheap labor, if we knew who the factory was maybe an email campaign or boycott could be useful.
Maybe a don't work with scummy factory campaign as opposed to a don't work with scummy magazines campaign
Wasn't he on camera being interviewed not long ago? I remember seeing some factor owner praising them associated with this.
Either way, we are long past the point of "civility" with these people. Their business isn't helping American industries in any way besides lining pockets, as these retarded monkeys can't make "high quality" goods. Do whatever you want to him and his business.
He sold out his country for money, that makes him treasonous and a snake. That means all the offers of the "social contract" have been nullified in regards to him.
Yeah a detailed PBS piece admitting that Springfield was overrun with 20000 Haitians, but it's tough for everyone, ya know? They are so far from home and just wanna work the nice jobs.
The factory owner, some dude who runs a metalworks / welding. Says 30% of his workforce is Haitian and he'd love to have more. Gee I wonder if it's because he's paying them next to zero, in cash?
It's just so difficult finding locals.. Them wanting a living wage and everything. The islanders are easier to ripoff.. err, work with.
Based on employee statements from long before this story broke, employees are lucky if they get one day off a week. He's probably glad that his new serfs are causing problems for that uppity white trash who weren't grateful for the chance to grovel at his feet.
I'm sure he's a piece of shit, but the real issue is the incentives being there in the first place. It only takes one factory owner wanting to make a profit more than they care about their community to fuck over everyone. That's not a stable system. That's bound to happen. Yes, they deserve blame, but it's also understandable. I hate to pull the 'if it wasn't him, it would have been someone else' argument, but it's true.
The issue is the US government shuttling these people in in the first place, setting them up to get papers, drivers licenses, handouts, free rent, and all that. It's not just that they'll work for less...it's that the whole system is set up - at our, the American taxpayer's, expense - to prop these people up. That's the issue. It's not an issue of "free market" (which we sadly have never been further from), it's an issue of government subsidies toward non-Americans.
Yes, the factory owners deserve blame. The government deserves a ton more. They've fucked us over much harder, every step of the way.
I want free market. I want meritocracy. Me paying to ship retarded foreigners over here to take my job and work for less is not, not, not, not, not a free market meritocracy.
Our government steals from us to fund our own suffering, poverty, and extinction.
It's far easier to [through peaceful and legal means only] intimidate every single potential employer of these people than it is the government.
"Hire invaders, go out of business," would send a very clear message. Of course the government would respond by attempting to make it illegal to boycott a business for the wrong reasons. Even more than they already have, I mean.
Yeah, the two go in tandem, if you don't want people clamoring for daddy government to fix everything. You also have to encourage people to go out and hammer a few sticky nails down themselves.
Oi vei, that sounds like the criminal side of the unions when they would bust people's kneecaps for not using union labor!
If you were them, you'd play both sides of organized labor, and I suspect that's what they do. The Pinkertons and the Teamsters, I think, are both them.
Cope. Lolbert nonsense. If there was a completely free labor market, factories would be importing endless hordes from the third world, paying them pennies per hour.
In completely free markets, there’s no incentive not to dump all the externalities onto others or society at large. Which is why pure libertarian free markets don’t work.
They work just fine in a closed system. What you're seeing is equivalent to pumping heat into a system and then going, "and this is why the laws of thermodynamics don't work."
Importing invaders from outside the market is obviously going to destabilize any market. That's one of thousand reasons why they need to go back.
Either you didn't read the rest of Kienan's post or you're putting words that weren't there. The quotes around the word had a more generalist feel. I didn't see the words "complete" or "absolute" in those sentences.
Precisely.
Also, you've given me an idea. We should call immigrant welfare:
Immy Stimmys
The left used to (pretend to) understand this in the early 00's when it was Walmart giving employees pamphlets on how to apply for food stamps and housing assistance.
That was nowhere near my point, but nice try. I wasn't trying to say how things should work, other than that I don't want perverse incentives and subsidies coming from the government, and thus taxpayers.
Also, although it wasn't my point, "lolbert nonsense" would still be better than what we currently have, because at least the flow of money would be voluntary. So the government would no longer be able to, as I ended my original comment...steal from us to fund our own suffering, poverty, and extinction. That would stop. And that would put an end to a lot of the immigration issues right there.
Again, wasn't my point and, again, would still probably work better than our current brand of corporatist socialism.
No, they wouldn't. Because most people aren't willing to move thousands of miles to a foreign country with a different language to get shit pay.
Why wouldn't you voluntarily work at a McDonald's in Dead Horse, Alaska? You've got no barriers. No one is stopping you. You could buy a plane ticket right now. There's free movement within the US. So why don't you?
Because the cost of that kind of a move is so fucking crazy both economic, culturally, and personally, that you literally wouldn't ever consider it. Neither do most other people.
A free market would mean that the government is NOT subsidizing this shit.
Your decision might change if the government promised you free food, free shelter, free healthcare, free travel, and a bonus. Most people still wouldn't take it because most people are invested in their local environment by one mechanism or another (career, family, culture, familiarity, etc). The only people who would take that are rootless people, mercenaries who will keep no investment, or criminals trying to get away.
That is why it works the way it does.
The answer to your hypothetical is if Dead Horse, Alaska can't draw anyone to work at McDonald's, it doesn't have a McDonald's and that is an absolutely acceptable outcome. We don't need to import an army of third-worlders to go staff a fast food restaurant somewhere that clearly isn't established enough to justify one's presence. If someone living in Dead Horse really wants to live near a McDonald's, they are the ones who need to exercise free movement.
If no American wants to go there to work at a McDonald's there and lack of garbage food isn't enough to make the current residents leave, then you have an equilibrium. The market is working just fine. Maybe some people are sad they can't have a Big Mac, but that is fine.
Hence my point. Even a completely lax and open border in a purely free market doesn't equate to hordes of people flooding in. You kill the subsidy system and the whole migration racket goes with it.
The factory owners are also taking subsidies from the government who is the one intentionally bringing them in to push demographic replacement as a mechanism of punishing political enemies, and securing votes.
As I've posted elsewhere in this thread, one of the employers has 30 , just thirty, Haitian employees. He's claiming he can't find _ ten times three_ people in the city of Springfield to employ doing menial labor. That's an obvious lie, and 30 jobs doesn't equate to 20,000 migrants. He's getting paid by the government to be an excuse to dump enough people in one region to sway a couple elections.
No factory for anything, ever, needs twenty thousand 60 IQ apes who can't even read their own language. There is literally no use for them in such numbers.
This happened to displace the real Americans who live there.
I've been there many times. It was a genuinely nice place, like a lot of Ohio used to be. It's sad and it's sickening and if I were the people of Springfield I'd be reaching for the ammo box right about now. Fuck voting and fuck elections, the wicked aren't going to stop if you ask nicely.
If the supposed factory is partially responsible, it should no longer occupy any space. Apply the principal to every business that undermines this country.
And the factory owner is a Jew. Of course.
You guys need to look up Postville, Iowa or listen to Blackpilled stream about it.
I've said for years now that we need major criminal actions against these employers.
There's a reason the people of Canton, OH (the place where the cat was eaten) don't flood Pittsburg: there's nothing more than their own personal savings that can take them there. Just because some nearby place is wealthy, doesn't mean that every single person will flood into the city from across the earth, even when there's no actual borders to stop them.
These people are being brought here. They will leave the moment the money dries up.
Yes, corporate migration is replacement migration is demographic replacement.
From Newsweek and also NewsNation:
These guys are always paying illegals illegally, under the table, and in criminal conditions. They are warned that reporting on their conditions could get the deported. Mass deportation of illegals is literally only a mechanism of stopping the bleeding.
These guys? Mr. McGregor over here? Put him in prison for RICO charges, and human trafficking.
Then it'll stop.
Sorry to have to be a little bit lefty about it, but the millionaire factory mogul is the fucking problem because he's being paid by the feds to turn your homes into migrant dumping grounds. He's a vassal of the Leftists & the Regime, and you treat the vassals just as badly as you treat their masters.
He employs thirty Haitians. There's twenty thousand in Springfield. And he's saying he just can't find thirty people in all of Springfield and the surrounding counties to do menial labor; therefore demographically replacing 30% of the city is a-okay.
Put them in prison, and that's when this changes. Make it impossible to accept bribes from the regime.
There are no circumstances where illiterate cannibals are better metal fabricators than rural white guys.
You assume they are even fabricating metal and not literally just moving boxes.
He's getting kickbacks from the Biden regime. The Haitians aren't doing shit.
Inb4 climate change burns down the factory.
Can't really directly boycott his company. But someone should figure out how to get his client list. Then tell -those- companies that you're not buying their products until they dump his company.
I'm not allowed to say what I think should happen to him and his factory.
Yes. If you have the time to dig that info up and type up a campaign document, leave out memes and specific ties to this site. That way when you post it, ot can easily be spread to other places without needing to be sanitized first.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech