You're free to archive and post the link yourself. It's a free forum, not a paid service where you are the customer. If you don't like the content, then post your own or downvote.
I have defended "review bombing" against leftist shit. Anybody should be allowed to be critical against media for any reason they choose. If some faggot wants to upvote "Moonlight" because it has black faggots, go ahead. I hate they try to disqualify the opposite opinion. If I wish to downvote it, because it has black faggots it's just as valid.
We've all said it a million times the left doesn't care about principles or hypocrisy, just power. Glad this guy flexed his own muscles and told them to kick rocks.
That people are cucks wanting to be a milquetoast faggot afraid to give offense even when trying to give advice on whether or not someone should purchase a product?
Mixed or neutral is negative. If a game isn't good enough to earn a positive review it's bad. If you're so neutral on it you can't make up your mind, then A: it's bad, because it's a waste of time to play something "neutral" or B: you don't need to review at all.
If your opinion is mixed and you feel so strongly about that, that you can't justify a positive or negative review, then your opinion does not serve the purpose of a review system to begin with, which is to inform purchase decisions.
And if a game is "meh" or can't justify a positive value judgement, then that should justify a negative. Because the game costs the consumer money, it should at least be a positive.
The neutral opinion is no review - if someone absolutely must tell the world that they don't have an actual opinion either way, that's just narcissism.
Feedback for the developer isn't the primary purpose of the review system, though. That's what the forums are for. The review system is for informing consumers.
The comments are just as pozzed. I remember when IMDB had messege boards for every movie, even total crap. But they removed them because they couldn't "keep people safe." Which really means they didn't want to mod shit.
I would take the ratings systems away entirely and just do it with comments
How is that any different? Isn't what a player review already is, apart from the additional thumb up / thumb down? How will it fix what you're complaining about?
how many copies sold.
Unfortunately, I don't think Valve is legally allowed to do that. But anyway, again, how would that solve anything you're criticising?
A fucking screenshot.
FOR ANTS.
Here's the tweet. Feel free to take and post your own screenshot.
https://x.com/ArturSmiarowski/status/1827386801310593108
With pleasure:
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/Cg9Vp
(you will note that the archive service cannot preserve the flag image, so the screenshot still has some value.)
post an archive link or just don't post.
You're free to archive and post the link yourself. It's a free forum, not a paid service where you are the customer. If you don't like the content, then post your own or downvote.
do as you're told.
Retarded post.
Knock off this dumb shit attitude. Archive barely functions and on any halfway decent browser doesn't work at all.
🔍
I have defended "review bombing" against leftist shit. Anybody should be allowed to be critical against media for any reason they choose. If some faggot wants to upvote "Moonlight" because it has black faggots, go ahead. I hate they try to disqualify the opposite opinion. If I wish to downvote it, because it has black faggots it's just as valid.
We've all said it a million times the left doesn't care about principles or hypocrisy, just power. Glad this guy flexed his own muscles and told them to kick rocks.
They're mad he won't add gay marriage in a game where having descendants is a mandatory mechanic
Steam link:
https://store.steampowered.com/app/2399160/Soulash_2/
Oh that was already on my wishlist, guess I'm bumping it up in priority now
Based and pierogi pilled
Fuck Polen rats. "Muh parents survived natzees" yet another failure of the Reich
Also Steam's review system sucks IMO, Thumbs up or Thumbs Down isn't the best system to judge a game.
That people are cucks wanting to be a milquetoast faggot afraid to give offense even when trying to give advice on whether or not someone should purchase a product?
Mixed or neutral is negative. If a game isn't good enough to earn a positive review it's bad. If you're so neutral on it you can't make up your mind, then A: it's bad, because it's a waste of time to play something "neutral" or B: you don't need to review at all.
If your opinion is mixed and you feel so strongly about that, that you can't justify a positive or negative review, then your opinion does not serve the purpose of a review system to begin with, which is to inform purchase decisions.
And if a game is "meh" or can't justify a positive value judgement, then that should justify a negative. Because the game costs the consumer money, it should at least be a positive.
The neutral opinion is no review - if someone absolutely must tell the world that they don't have an actual opinion either way, that's just narcissism.
Feedback for the developer isn't the primary purpose of the review system, though. That's what the forums are for. The review system is for informing consumers.
The comments are just as pozzed. I remember when IMDB had messege boards for every movie, even total crap. But they removed them because they couldn't "keep people safe." Which really means they didn't want to mod shit.
How is that any different? Isn't what a player review already is, apart from the additional thumb up / thumb down? How will it fix what you're complaining about?
Unfortunately, I don't think Valve is legally allowed to do that. But anyway, again, how would that solve anything you're criticising?
Call of Duty: Black Ops III has nearly 140k reviews. How many do you read before making a decision?
Or if you're Steam, how do you sort reviews?
No better advertising these days than to tell the woke mob to lick deez nuts.