This is stupid even for them. They DIDN'T incorrectly label Harris a "Border Czar". That was the fucking job. You've just decided it had to be incorrect because you don't her associated with the border.
Frankly, Harris knew that her being the border czar was to basically blow up her political career so she couldn't challenge Biden.
Frankly, Harris knew that her being the border czar was to basically blow up her political career so she couldn't challenge Biden.
I believe you, and yet something doesn't make sense. Biden didn't force her to never visit the border. He didn't force her to ignore it. She could've visited and talked about it, and Biden could have kept pursuing whatever policy he wanted. Some his changes, very late in his term, actually reduced traffic, basically by reinstating Trump-era policies. So Kamala could have talked that shit up for 3 years, pretending to care, and at the end she could've pitched herself as mildly successful. But that's not what she did. She mainly rejected the role. I guess for the reason you gave.
If I didn't know better, I'd say kamala was acting like she wasn't right about to run for President. You do wonder who knows what. But clearly she was planning on Biden's quitting because she had all the delegates wrapped up 18 hours afterwards.
I love when they twist themselves in knots and go overboard. I totally support them acting this ridiculous.
Absolute clown show. Let's go.
It's the main reason I want to put Trump back in the ring. They hate him so much, they hurt themselves in their confusion.
This is stupid even for them. They DIDN'T incorrectly label Harris a "Border Czar". That was the fucking job. You've just decided it had to be incorrect because you don't her associated with the border.
Frankly, Harris knew that her being the border czar was to basically blow up her political career so she couldn't challenge Biden.
Fact Check: Kamala Harris was the Vice President of the U.S. when she was in charge of fixing the border crisis, not the emperor of Russia.
I believe you, and yet something doesn't make sense. Biden didn't force her to never visit the border. He didn't force her to ignore it. She could've visited and talked about it, and Biden could have kept pursuing whatever policy he wanted. Some his changes, very late in his term, actually reduced traffic, basically by reinstating Trump-era policies. So Kamala could have talked that shit up for 3 years, pretending to care, and at the end she could've pitched herself as mildly successful. But that's not what she did. She mainly rejected the role. I guess for the reason you gave.
If I didn't know better, I'd say kamala was acting like she wasn't right about to run for President. You do wonder who knows what. But clearly she was planning on Biden's quitting because she had all the delegates wrapped up 18 hours afterwards.
Well good for them, took them only four years to correct a mistake.
Funny how that happened
How many of their current articles are waiting to be “corrected” in four year’s time?
https://x.com/axios/status/1816078350659494130
Axios’s tweet has the funniest community note.
Archived image copy here :
https://patriots.win/p/17tebre4LU/wouldnt-it-be-great-if-kamala-we/
Archive of the tweet with comments
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/qa5yf
Community noted and an epic ratio on the comments. Surprised they haven't tried to memory hole the tweet itself.
Joseph R Biden, March 2021
Wasn't it the same author, even?
Nitter link.
Article archive.
You don't hate journalists enough. You think they don't, but you really don't.
In North Korea the daily paper is under glass in public places because they don’t want people to have a record of past things the government has said.
Axios isn't, the committee/board/union that runs Axios is throwing all the actual workers under the bus.