This is 100% sabotage. When's the last time they trotted Joe out to do a press conference?
For whatever reason, he's outlived his usefulness, and the very machine that propped him up is now trying to destroy him. Seriously, he's massively demented, but they still could have kept people in the dark if they hadn't intentionally put him in the spotlight over and over and over, and then reported on his gaffes so brutally.
Putting that old man up there on at the podium is a war crime.
We know the reason, his deterioration has almost certainly cost them this entire election and they almost certainly are blaming him for not being able to hold it together for a few more months to secure the win so they could keep puppetting.
So now they are both securing their replacement by making him look so bad that everyone understands why he was replaced and pettily destroying his entire legacy and name by making his last image be a laughing stock of retardation.
That last bit I think should be a wake up call for all the Lefties (but we know it won't). He spent over half a century being a good little bitch for them, but one fuck up and they are already writing the history books to make him into a clown who meant nothing.
That last bit I think should be a wake up call for all the Lefties (but we know it won't). He spent over half a century being a good little bitch for them, but one fuck up and they are already writing the history books to make him into a clown who meant nothing.
The hundred you're referring to didn't harm the DNC's chances of keeping power. The one he's referring to is the only one that matters. Ironically they're going scorched earth on him for the same reason they've been going scorched earth on Trump: He's a threat the uniparty's stranglehold on power.
My theory is that they actually want to get rid of Dr. Jill. She was only supposed to be Joe’s caretaker while they held the levers of power. Instead, she’s been acting like Edith Wilson.
Wasn't this the earliest presidential debate ever? I mean technically they're not even their respective parties candidates yet- the Republican National convention is next week, and the Democratic National convention is in August.
My guess is that this debate was set up specifically to gauge Biden's fitness for the election this fall. If he did poorly, the Democrats were planning to kick in their contingency plan to replace him, which we're seeing now.
The turmoil this is causing in their party is awesome, but I have to wonder if it wouldn't have been better if Trump had refused to debate him until it was too late for them to swap candidates.
That last bit I think should be a wake up call for all the Lefties (but we know it won't). He spent over half a century being a good little bitch for them, but one fuck up and they are already writing the history books to make him into a clown who meant nothing.
Right out of the Soviet playbook. You could be a loyal communist all your life but cross Stalin once and you’re written out of history.
He's not making that decision. Or in fact any of them for years and years.
This is Jill and Hunter, their faction trying to hold on to power and keep themselves from being prosecuted for various things. Treason most likely.
They're trying to prop him up to avoid being deposed.
It's the only thing that makes sense to me, since the DNC and media have been covering up for this babbling old pedophile for decades already without any remorse. They wouldn't stop gaslighting us now, unless they have a power struggle in their ranks.
Hunter is a crack addict who is willfully in sway of the CCP, who provided him with drugs and (at least one) underage prostitute during Joe's vice presidency.
The idea that Hunter actually has it together to manage the affairs of the PotS is laughable.
Hunter has a team of handlers who keep him out of trouble enough that the major media organizations can memory-hole his fuckups.
If Hunter faced any serious political opposition, there is enough evidence to see him go down for a decade in federal prison.
Hunter is useful because he does what he is told. He is not, and never has been a mastermind.
I am more inclined to think that Obama's presidential staff are actually making almost all of the day-to-day decisions in the Whitehouse.
I've had a lot of fun wargaming what I would do in the shoes of the DNC or Biden campaign, but I think that's over: Biden will be dumped. On to wargaming the Trump campaign. If they swap Biden, everyone to the right of Bernie needs to hammer the new candidate for not 25thing Biden: "if he can't run and can't remember names, why is he still president and why aren't you calling for his resignation?"
It may simply be too late in the election cycle to replace Biden. They could pull some nonsense at the convention, but most of the delegates who will be there will have already been selected on the basis of votes for Biden specifically. Any candidate who replaces him will have a very fractious Dem party to campaign with as a result.
On top of that, the question remains who can possibly replace him and actually do better electorally. If they push him out before the convention, it would be difficult to sidestep Kamala, who is even more deranged than Biden is. Whitmer is so unpopular that she might actually lose her home state. Newsom might solidify the female vote, but he's such a wet blanket that Trump would walk all over him rhetorically, and the mess he's made of California gives him a terrible record to run on, which the other side can exploit.
The delegates are also a problem if Biden doesn't go willingly or die. They're bound to Biden and there are rules in place to replace them if they were to vote for someone else.
If Biden is swapped out, only Kamala has legal right to use his war chest.
My understanding is that Kamala just has to be on the ticket. So they could theoretically keep her in the VP slot and replace Biden with say Big Mike and be good to go.
They could JFK Biden, which I think they're spiteful enough to do. That would solve some of their problems, notably the fractious party, especially if they're able to pin it on Trump supporters somehow. I'm sure the FBI has a glownigger on hand that can get the job done.
Who else is there?
Big Mike. He's the obvious choice to replace Kamala without triggering a spat over DIE. As I've said elsewhere there's no one more oppressed than a black faggot in a dress.
My brother and I have been speculating about Michelle "Big Mike" Obama potentially joining the race last minute, along with a highly unlikely chance of Killary Clinton joining and getting beat for the 3rd time.
You're not the only ones, not by a long shot. Big Mike solves the DIE problem that replacing Kamala poses. I think the Kamala stays on the ticket so they keep access to the money. A Big Mike/Kamala ticket is the most likely outcome IME. Kamala would probably stay VP to limit the damage she can do electorally but it's possible they put Big Mike in the VP slot instead.
What do you think about this idea I read in an opinion piece:
Biden makes Obama his running mate and publicly announces that he will resign pretty much immediately upon election. The 22nd Amendment only bars someone from being "elected to the office of President" more than twice. He wins, resigns, and you get another 4 years of Obama.
I personally don't think it will work because running Obama wouldn't get them any votes they didn't already have, and may very well lose them a few from people who don't appreciate them gaming the system.
Plus, they're almost certain to be mired in court challenges- the 22nd Amendment also says that you can only be elected once if you served more than two years of another president's term. Since Obama's already been elected twice, that language would seem to bar him from just assuming Biden's term.
The suggestion, just like calls to pack the Supreme Court, does serve to illustrate how the Democrats are only interested in the rules as a means to acquire power, and they eagerly look for any loophole to abuse the system when it no longer suits them.
As someone who loathes American conservatism (ie Neocons), I bought into the anti-Tucker sentiment. Post Fox Tucker is not some sort of game changer, but his long form interview are worth watching.
I'll give him credit for carrying on. Even in his state, he must've realized that nothing he was going to say after "Vice President Trump" would matter.
For context, after mixing up Zelensky and Putin, POTUS confuses Kamala and Donald.
Edit: changed wrong link
This is 100% sabotage. When's the last time they trotted Joe out to do a press conference?
For whatever reason, he's outlived his usefulness, and the very machine that propped him up is now trying to destroy him. Seriously, he's massively demented, but they still could have kept people in the dark if they hadn't intentionally put him in the spotlight over and over and over, and then reported on his gaffes so brutally.
Putting that old man up there on at the podium is a war crime.
We know the reason, his deterioration has almost certainly cost them this entire election and they almost certainly are blaming him for not being able to hold it together for a few more months to secure the win so they could keep puppetting.
So now they are both securing their replacement by making him look so bad that everyone understands why he was replaced and pettily destroying his entire legacy and name by making his last image be a laughing stock of retardation.
That last bit I think should be a wake up call for all the Lefties (but we know it won't). He spent over half a century being a good little bitch for them, but one fuck up and they are already writing the history books to make him into a clown who meant nothing.
One? More like a hundred lol
The hundred you're referring to didn't harm the DNC's chances of keeping power. The one he's referring to is the only one that matters. Ironically they're going scorched earth on him for the same reason they've been going scorched earth on Trump: He's a threat the uniparty's stranglehold on power.
Was the debate an honest test for Biden or was it a hit job because they knew exactly what would happen if they let him out after dark?
My theory is that they actually want to get rid of Dr. Jill. She was only supposed to be Joe’s caretaker while they held the levers of power. Instead, she’s been acting like Edith Wilson.
Wasn't this the earliest presidential debate ever? I mean technically they're not even their respective parties candidates yet- the Republican National convention is next week, and the Democratic National convention is in August.
My guess is that this debate was set up specifically to gauge Biden's fitness for the election this fall. If he did poorly, the Democrats were planning to kick in their contingency plan to replace him, which we're seeing now.
The turmoil this is causing in their party is awesome, but I have to wonder if it wouldn't have been better if Trump had refused to debate him until it was too late for them to swap candidates.
Right out of the Soviet playbook. You could be a loyal communist all your life but cross Stalin once and you’re written out of history.
He's not making that decision. Or in fact any of them for years and years.
This is Jill and Hunter, their faction trying to hold on to power and keep themselves from being prosecuted for various things. Treason most likely.
They're trying to prop him up to avoid being deposed.
It's the only thing that makes sense to me, since the DNC and media have been covering up for this babbling old pedophile for decades already without any remorse. They wouldn't stop gaslighting us now, unless they have a power struggle in their ranks.
Hunter is a crack addict who is willfully in sway of the CCP, who provided him with drugs and (at least one) underage prostitute during Joe's vice presidency.
The idea that Hunter actually has it together to manage the affairs of the PotS is laughable.
Hunter has a team of handlers who keep him out of trouble enough that the major media organizations can memory-hole his fuckups.
If Hunter faced any serious political opposition, there is enough evidence to see him go down for a decade in federal prison.
Hunter is useful because he does what he is told. He is not, and never has been a mastermind.
I am more inclined to think that Obama's presidential staff are actually making almost all of the day-to-day decisions in the Whitehouse.
I've had a lot of fun wargaming what I would do in the shoes of the DNC or Biden campaign, but I think that's over: Biden will be dumped. On to wargaming the Trump campaign. If they swap Biden, everyone to the right of Bernie needs to hammer the new candidate for not 25thing Biden: "if he can't run and can't remember names, why is he still president and why aren't you calling for his resignation?"
It may simply be too late in the election cycle to replace Biden. They could pull some nonsense at the convention, but most of the delegates who will be there will have already been selected on the basis of votes for Biden specifically. Any candidate who replaces him will have a very fractious Dem party to campaign with as a result.
On top of that, the question remains who can possibly replace him and actually do better electorally. If they push him out before the convention, it would be difficult to sidestep Kamala, who is even more deranged than Biden is. Whitmer is so unpopular that she might actually lose her home state. Newsom might solidify the female vote, but he's such a wet blanket that Trump would walk all over him rhetorically, and the mess he's made of California gives him a terrible record to run on, which the other side can exploit.
Who else is there?
It isn't the delegates that make it too late, it's the campaign money. If Biden is swapped out, only Kamala has legal right to use his war chest.
They don't want her either because she is an even bigger underdog against Trump.
The delegates are also a problem if Biden doesn't go willingly or die. They're bound to Biden and there are rules in place to replace them if they were to vote for someone else.
My understanding is that Kamala just has to be on the ticket. So they could theoretically keep her in the VP slot and replace Biden with say Big Mike and be good to go.
They could JFK Biden, which I think they're spiteful enough to do. That would solve some of their problems, notably the fractious party, especially if they're able to pin it on Trump supporters somehow. I'm sure the FBI has a glownigger on hand that can get the job done.
Big Mike. He's the obvious choice to replace Kamala without triggering a spat over DIE. As I've said elsewhere there's no one more oppressed than a black faggot in a dress.
My brother and I have been speculating about Michelle "Big Mike" Obama potentially joining the race last minute, along with a highly unlikely chance of Killary Clinton joining and getting beat for the 3rd time.
You're not the only ones, not by a long shot. Big Mike solves the DIE problem that replacing Kamala poses. I think the Kamala stays on the ticket so they keep access to the money. A Big Mike/Kamala ticket is the most likely outcome IME. Kamala would probably stay VP to limit the damage she can do electorally but it's possible they put Big Mike in the VP slot instead.
What do you think about this idea I read in an opinion piece:
Biden makes Obama his running mate and publicly announces that he will resign pretty much immediately upon election. The 22nd Amendment only bars someone from being "elected to the office of President" more than twice. He wins, resigns, and you get another 4 years of Obama.
I personally don't think it will work because running Obama wouldn't get them any votes they didn't already have, and may very well lose them a few from people who don't appreciate them gaming the system.
Plus, they're almost certain to be mired in court challenges- the 22nd Amendment also says that you can only be elected once if you served more than two years of another president's term. Since Obama's already been elected twice, that language would seem to bar him from just assuming Biden's term.
The suggestion, just like calls to pack the Supreme Court, does serve to illustrate how the Democrats are only interested in the rules as a means to acquire power, and they eagerly look for any loophole to abuse the system when it no longer suits them.
Not a bad thought, but the real question is, why would Obama do that when he's already running the administration?
100% sabotage would be him sayinh "go fuck yourself san diego" to the giggles of a few millenials in the control room.
Praise Musk for twitter - if he hadn’t freed the one social media platform then CNN would be covering this up.
Facebook would be banning you from sharing these videos (factcheckers would be labelling them misinformation and “cheap fakes”)
And the White House would be working with Google and Big Tech to ban any prolific sharers
Have you seen Matt Taibbi's mention of the Twitter Files on Tucker?
I hadn’t seen that thanks. Matt Taibbi is one of the few journalists doing journalism.
So programs set up to censor and manipulate social media overseas ended up being used in the US.
As someone who loathes American conservatism (ie Neocons), I bought into the anti-Tucker sentiment. Post Fox Tucker is not some sort of game changer, but his long form interview are worth watching.
Thanks for the nightmare fuel.
Billboards. There needs to be at least a hundred of these spread out over all blue cities.
I'd kick in to the crowdfund.
Wait till he's confirmed as the Dem candidate though. Don't push this too early while they can still replace him.
I'll give him credit for carrying on. Even in his state, he must've realized that nothing he was going to say after "Vice President Trump" would matter.