The modern Christian feminist grifter on twitter
(twitter.com)
Comments (76)
sorted by:
So just a quick doom scroll of her (?) twatter timeline and...
That said I'm sure there's a sad simp out there that will buy her a house at some point. Hopefully her boyfriend will let him keep his Nintendo switch.
A tale as old as time.
It's amazing just how consistent it is. Look, to preface this, if it's legitimate, I totally encourage ex-thots finding themselves and getting better. Do it! That's great! Improve yourself; man or woman, improve yourself! That's hero shit right there! But the bitches who get defensive about their mistakes probably aren't ex-thots.
It really is amazing how often you see this; a "conservative" woman on the internet who is nothing but a series of bad takes, feminism-lite, and bashing men, while engaging in and encouraging terrible behavior.
No, thot. I'm not obligated to side with you just because you're now sorta slightly condemning some thottery.
Miss me with that.
Yep, and after they get the ring and the wedding and the social status, they'll get borrrred and won't be haaaapy anymore and frivdiv to find themselves at 37-40.
To modern women “improve yourself” just means don’t have sex for about a week and then go back to being the same person
Again, having someone as your partner because you literally can't get anyone else, and the child literally can't disagree to it is the opposite of a flex, you retard.
Seriously? OP didn't even lead with that.
I mentioned it in one of the replies but yeah i didnt put it in the title
Mostly cause even if she didn't have one, you shouldnt be buying any female a house
I saw that reply and thought you meant she would bear the husband's children, not that she was a single mom.
Same, for the record. "Shes bringing a kid" sounds like the aforementioned childbearing, not "you're as stepdad now."
I guess I was being too charitable as well. One is wholesome and continues the human race. The other is simultaneously top-notch thottery and simpery.
You have a very charitable mindset
It was more the phrasing.
I thought we weren't doing phrasing...
Why does she need another house if the last guy already gave her one? /s
Just wait until you find out about her "RV Ministry" scam a few years ago, her party lifestyle, pretty clear she left her kid with her parents and 'explored herself'
Never trust an "influencer."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Mission_Society_Church_of_God
I feel like one party might be getting a slightly better deal here, while that same party is acting incredibly entitled.
Here's the sort of ironic part...I have no inherent issue with the arrangement, if everyone knows what's what.
Like...what are you bringing to this? Sure, you're bringing something, but it's eclipsed by your shitty attitude. Unless you're promising to stick by him in sickness (yes, really) and in health, for better and for worse (yes, really), it's kind of a nonstarter.
It's like that trade meme.
I give you nothing but grief, you give me whatever the fuck I demand.
No, that's not how it works. If you want someone to "buy you a house," use some basic sales(wo)manship, and say what you're offering, you insufferable whore.
Whether you're a man or a woman, no one owes you shit. Offer something, get something. I'm sure as fuck not buying her a house. She can eat shit.
Shes bringing a kid
If we're not assembling the kid together, I'm not interested.
Again, offset by terrible fucking attitude.
well she claims she owns her own house but also wants him to buy her a house...
Supposedly rich parents
"I am the table!" -thot
Down on all fours all the time?
It's a thing from hoe_math. A lot of women in couple's counseling, when asked what they bring to the table, will replay "I bring myself" or "I am the table!"
My response remains, though.
It's like throwing a hot dog down a hallway
What about this is supposed to be Christian? Because I'm not seeing it.
It's in her Twitter bio. What more could you ask for?
Actions. Not words. Words are useless, and Christianity is performative not signalling.
This? This looks like basic bitch.
A lot of the christian right females on twitter are basic bitches. But when you call them out on it they start claiming jesus said not judge others
That quote is, funny enough, misused or falsely represented so often that it's basically signalling a fake.
Speaking it out of a desire to avoid the consequences of your actions is about as heretical as it gets.
they used it to justify pushing Nala, an OF girl who claims to have just repented
Ha ha, that's a good one. Genuine contrition doesn't advertise.
Her bio
Pretty sure Detroit has cheap houses. Inb4 no not there!
I'd buy her a house if the alternative was living with her, I suppose...
Enjoy Detroit, miss.
Baltimore has houses for one dollar
Her whole timeline is some entitled princess shit
rofl@profile picture. She looks like a really cheap surgically modified porn star and why does she have an illustration of a trender on her shirt?
Because that's what marriage is all about. What do I get out of it. What can that thing I have to marry do for ME.
The idea of not being able to fuck every Chad she sees is so unbearable to her that she can only fathom sacrificing that lifestyle in exchange for a wildly pampered existence of complete luxury. She thinks women of her caliber have to be bribed with riches in order to not sleep around with randos 24/7. In reality, women like her don’t deserve marriage.
And you wonder why increasing numbers of men are thinking that the juice is not worth the squeeze and walking away.
All of the close relationships I know that have survived started out renting together and graduated to a house over time. The most personal relationship I know that failed had the husband bringing a wife into his pre-owned home.
It's almost like there needs to be some aspect of teamwork and mutual respect in a relationship or something. Who knew?
I don't get it. Being a provider would indeed be the complimentary role to a SAHM if you are trying for that setup. If you prefer some other household arrangement, you probably should say what that is.
Its not just buying a house. Its buying HER a house
Are you under the impression the children will be made to live outside?
I think if she'd said buy us a home it would have came across as less risky for anyone willing to go that far.
I'm under the impression the house will be legally under her name and once she gets it she can do whatever she wants and he's screwed
I was under the impression she said this shit for attention, and you took the bait.
She believes it
Being a provider usually means you buy yourself a house to raise your family in. Buying a house for the woman is what happens when she divorces you.
No no that's when you just give her the house
That's what I meant. If you were to be co-owners it would make more sense to say, "buy us a house".
Basically red flags abound.
Its a problem of framing, in which it reveals enough about the person behind it to suspect the otherwise solid idea is a trap.
Its like a grown man telling your underaged daughter she needs to learn to suck dick better to keep her future husband happy. Its completely true, but him saying it in that way (if out loud at all) means its out of line.
To be clear, I would not marry this woman with TheImp's ring finger.
She seems more of an anti-Semite than a Christian.