Does not fit the narrative the media wants to play out.
Another thing to note, the female officer who shot him has been applauded and praised for her heroism yet the man who held a bollard up to the perpetrator to stop him getting into the kids play area and committing acts of horror to children has remained silent.
I mean, there’s also a “Law and Order” (politics, not the tv show) aspect to that, in that we are a nanny state (and arguably becoming a police state) where “vigilante justice” is almost always met with outsize force by the state, and where the media almost always praises “our men and women in uniform”…
Except when they come up against Abos, of course, or turn out to be “conservatives”, or indeed when they are veterans/retire from the force…
It’s exactly the same dynamic as anywhere else in the Anglosphere.
“Cope good” except when they’re not.
I don’t think her gender is all that relevant here, tbh…
But I will agree that the media narrative is determined to make it seem somehow relevant.
Elliot Roger also killed guys. Not saying this makes BBC correct, but someone killing both men and women isn't not definitive proof the motivation was not some incel shit.
My favorite part of the Elliot Rodger situation is how the media claimed he was white when he looked like he could be Southeast Asian or Hispanic if you didn't know anything about him, and in fact his mom is SE Asian.
So he kills 6 people and 5 were women and they say he was specifically targeting women? If you just took a random sample of 6 people in the general population you'd get 5 women and 1 man like 1/4 of the time. What a joke.
It’s also a Westfield shopping centre (mostly clothes, homewares, cosmetics, “boutiques”, et al). In an area with almost certainly a proportionally higher number of young, single women than many other places (Bondi itself is literally one of the heaviest-touristed areas in the entire world).
I would almost guarantee that if they measured the sample population in there at the time, it would be heavily skewed towards women. Like probably 70/30, at least.
yeah. agree. it was a shopping mall. in a "crowded Sydney shopping center" wow killed mostly women wow what a shock. a shopping mall. I know when I'm trying to locate my friends the first place I look for them is at the local shopping mall.
Actively seeking out women, says who? Were you there? He was probably just seeking out the weakest targets. All he had was a knife. You gonna take a run at a 6'4" 240 pound man or the mother and baby if you want to inflict harm on others? This is just a case of women make easy targets because they're women not a case of he's attacking women because he's an incel woman hater. Did he check the baby's gender before stabbing it? Think he could tell from afar? He was going for easy targets.
He turned away from multiple men that he could have attacked. I've been watching the news cycle 24/7 since it happened - I've seen the CCTV footage - I've read countless eyewitness reports.
Perhaps. He could also just be scared of men because they aren't easy targets. I'm just playing devil's advocate here. I have a hard time trusting the news cycle if they want to frame things in this manner because they're wrong about things 99% of the time.
Not an incel narrative, they're all careful not to use that word, but they are heavily implying that he is a single male. That targets a broader range of men in any forthcoming legislation or policy by the Australian Government.
Awaiting the inevitable "radicalised by Andrew Tate/Pearl Davis/ Fresh 'n Fit" narrative to begin.
That's my concern too. That we're seeing a moral panic being crafted against an outgroup whom no-one will come to the defence to. The more reporting I see, the more I am convinced of this.
And now with a second knife attack in Sydney, we await and see what the media makes of the perpetrator because I fear another "lone wolf" attack.
The most shocking thing in all of this was just how quickly the NSW government threw $18 million into an inquest - an inquest you can guess they already have planned out
So last night there was another stabbing incident in Sydney
A brown teenager who is
Muslim
motivated by religious anger toward a church priest's comments on Islam
now classified as a terrorism event
police looking into his online history
So within a few days the other checkmarks are being ticked
One point I'll give to the "single white male" agenda though is that they've withheld this kid's identity because he isn't white
So now my gut feeling has become: that this is clearly an op. Google's sensitive events policy has been active for 2 months(?) now?... So maybe this is a test in gauging response and altering records shortly. This also comes as Australia is going have the digital extremism bill amendment in June/July. So the more shit like this happens the more "support" this bill will probably get.
It's an attack on single white men first, but then it'll be all men, and then anyone who they wanna classify as a threat. Legally speaking.
Is there any proof he was gay (the male escort thing didn't bring up any hint his target clientele were men from what I could fathom)? All what I could find points to him dating women and failing at it because he was "sweet and kind", as one example:
That's a fair point. Frankly, merely being an escort is enough to throw serious doubt on him being anything but a leftist. It's not impossible for him to be on the right and an escort, but it's definitely highly unlikely.
he wasn't a gay escort - he was an unsuccessful escort for women. he couldn't get a GF so he turned to this for a chance to have sex. from what I know he had no clients at all
Not in Australia you wouldn't.
Using a legal firearm to kill/incapacitate someone who has just killed 6 people and injured 19 others will get you more time in jail then using an illegal firearm to do the same thing.
Fucking joke of a country.
He is a schizophrenic who went off his meds. He tried to be a male escort as he had no luck with women. He wasn't an incel but it was rejection by women that drove him to it.
Well he is a white male...and considering the amount of video games that they play on a daily basis, lack of female contact, it makes sense some would snap.
Just like it's even less surprising when fatherless, low IQ blacks chimp out and destroy everything around them and have like 50% of the murder rate to their names!
Also, the dirty fucking Jews probably just started WW3. Nice.
The media seem to be focusing on two aspects of him, his neuroatypical mindset (like you'd see with schizophrenia or autism that generally women see as a deal breaker) and his failure to attract a partner without using the term "incel". Namely marking his "sweet and kind" nature as a warning sign.
Except in the video he clearly chased men as well.
Does not fit the narrative the media wants to play out.
Another thing to note, the female officer who shot him has been applauded and praised for her heroism yet the man who held a bollard up to the perpetrator to stop him getting into the kids play area and committing acts of horror to children has remained silent.
I mean, there’s also a “Law and Order” (politics, not the tv show) aspect to that, in that we are a nanny state (and arguably becoming a police state) where “vigilante justice” is almost always met with outsize force by the state, and where the media almost always praises “our men and women in uniform”…
Except when they come up against Abos, of course, or turn out to be “conservatives”, or indeed when they are veterans/retire from the force…
It’s exactly the same dynamic as anywhere else in the Anglosphere.
“Cope good” except when they’re not.
I don’t think her gender is all that relevant here, tbh…
But I will agree that the media narrative is determined to make it seem somehow relevant.
Elliot Roger also killed guys. Not saying this makes BBC correct, but someone killing both men and women isn't not definitive proof the motivation was not some incel shit.
True. I love how if the perpetrator is trans then their motivation (like audrey hale) is covered up and hidden for years.
But if the perpetrator is a white guy then suddenly the police know exactly why he did it somehow.
Or a Muslim attacking conservative Christians, as has evidently also just happened in Sydney (y'know, that other post)...
Then the cops protect the perp, while victim-blaming and then blaming the community for "rioting" in response...
Insane. Utterly bonkers clown world...
Elliot Roger wasn't an incel despite whining he couldn't get a girlfriend. The real cause for it was "Affluenze" and a bitch stepmom, simping dad.
My favorite part of the Elliot Rodger situation is how the media claimed he was white when he looked like he could be Southeast Asian or Hispanic if you didn't know anything about him, and in fact his mom is SE Asian.
So he kills 6 people and 5 were women and they say he was specifically targeting women? If you just took a random sample of 6 people in the general population you'd get 5 women and 1 man like 1/4 of the time. What a joke.
It’s also a Westfield shopping centre (mostly clothes, homewares, cosmetics, “boutiques”, et al). In an area with almost certainly a proportionally higher number of young, single women than many other places (Bondi itself is literally one of the heaviest-touristed areas in the entire world).
I would almost guarantee that if they measured the sample population in there at the time, it would be heavily skewed towards women. Like probably 70/30, at least.
At a guess, anyway.
But what do I know. I hate Westfield malls…
Elliot Rodger killed just as many men as he did women and yet it was still labelled as him targeting women.
I guess it shows that facts and logic should not get in the way of a narrative and how much the media values men.
yeah. agree. it was a shopping mall. in a "crowded Sydney shopping center" wow killed mostly women wow what a shock. a shopping mall. I know when I'm trying to locate my friends the first place I look for them is at the local shopping mall.
He was actively seeking out women - the male that dies was a security guard literally on his first day of the job with insufficient training.
Actively seeking out women, says who? Were you there? He was probably just seeking out the weakest targets. All he had was a knife. You gonna take a run at a 6'4" 240 pound man or the mother and baby if you want to inflict harm on others? This is just a case of women make easy targets because they're women not a case of he's attacking women because he's an incel woman hater. Did he check the baby's gender before stabbing it? Think he could tell from afar? He was going for easy targets.
He turned away from multiple men that he could have attacked. I've been watching the news cycle 24/7 since it happened - I've seen the CCTV footage - I've read countless eyewitness reports.
Perhaps. He could also just be scared of men because they aren't easy targets. I'm just playing devil's advocate here. I have a hard time trusting the news cycle if they want to frame things in this manner because they're wrong about things 99% of the time.
Not an incel narrative, they're all careful not to use that word, but they are heavily implying that he is a single male. That targets a broader range of men in any forthcoming legislation or policy by the Australian Government.
Awaiting the inevitable "radicalised by Andrew Tate/Pearl Davis/ Fresh 'n Fit" narrative to begin.
yeah i'm not buying that, fags have negative standarts when it comes to banging
That's my concern too. That we're seeing a moral panic being crafted against an outgroup whom no-one will come to the defence to. The more reporting I see, the more I am convinced of this.
And now with a second knife attack in Sydney, we await and see what the media makes of the perpetrator because I fear another "lone wolf" attack.
The most shocking thing in all of this was just how quickly the NSW government threw $18 million into an inquest - an inquest you can guess they already have planned out
Yep, clearly an agenda had to be pushed. So many ripe details to do so. I'll relist below what I said in another post (as reported by Aussie news):
single white male. Wearing a football jersey to make it more blatant
history of mental illness (schizo)
targeted women
his father was heavily religious
put down by a stunning & brave middle-aged white female police officer
was KNOWN by authorities for years and not dealt with in the past
stabbed a baby
Aussie news media now calling him a "mass murderer" after killing 6 people. Trying to really elevate his evil status
That's all that will matter to the authorities and the Government. Everything else is white noise.
perhaps. but that's a decent list of pivots that could be made should the authorities want to shift blame onto either of them
So last night there was another stabbing incident in Sydney
A brown teenager who is
Muslim
motivated by religious anger toward a church priest's comments on Islam
now classified as a terrorism event
police looking into his online history
So within a few days the other checkmarks are being ticked
One point I'll give to the "single white male" agenda though is that they've withheld this kid's identity because he isn't white
So now my gut feeling has become: that this is clearly an op. Google's sensitive events policy has been active for 2 months(?) now?... So maybe this is a test in gauging response and altering records shortly. This also comes as Australia is going have the digital extremism bill amendment in June/July. So the more shit like this happens the more "support" this bill will probably get.
It's an attack on single white men first, but then it'll be all men, and then anyone who they wanna classify as a threat. Legally speaking.
Is there any proof he was gay (the male escort thing didn't bring up any hint his target clientele were men from what I could fathom)? All what I could find points to him dating women and failing at it because he was "sweet and kind", as one example:
https://archive.ph/ciOlc
OK, so the guy was a homeless schizo. My curiosity has been satisfied.
Where did this come from?
Here is a source on him being a male escort :
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/04/14/sydney-bondi-stabbing-who-joel-cauchi-escort-schizophrenia/
It doesn’t suggest he is living a “conservative” lifestyle
A counter article from his father:
https://archive.ph/Oq3Y8
Male escort =/= men offering services to men.
That's a fair point. Frankly, merely being an escort is enough to throw serious doubt on him being anything but a leftist. It's not impossible for him to be on the right and an escort, but it's definitely highly unlikely.
He could've been gay-for-pay.
That's also true.
he wasn't a gay escort - he was an unsuccessful escort for women. he couldn't get a GF so he turned to this for a chance to have sex. from what I know he had no clients at all
Wouldn't you like to have a two handed bastard sword facing this
Not in Australia you wouldn't. Using a legal firearm to kill/incapacitate someone who has just killed 6 people and injured 19 others will get you more time in jail then using an illegal firearm to do the same thing. Fucking joke of a country.
so...an incel
Benjamin Cohen
He is a schizophrenic who went off his meds. He tried to be a male escort as he had no luck with women. He wasn't an incel but it was rejection by women that drove him to it.
Well he is a white male...and considering the amount of video games that they play on a daily basis, lack of female contact, it makes sense some would snap.
I mean, this one was homeless, and had been for some time…
I don’t think he was playing many vidya games, lol.
Just like it's even less surprising when fatherless, low IQ blacks chimp out and destroy everything around them and have like 50% of the murder rate to their names!
Also, the dirty fucking Jews probably just started WW3. Nice.
The media seem to be focusing on two aspects of him, his neuroatypical mindset (like you'd see with schizophrenia or autism that generally women see as a deal breaker) and his failure to attract a partner without using the term "incel". Namely marking his "sweet and kind" nature as a warning sign.
https://archive.ph/ciOlc