So last night there was another stabbing incident in Sydney
A brown teenager who is
Muslim
motivated by religious anger toward a church priest's comments on Islam
now classified as a terrorism event
police looking into his online history
So within a few days the other checkmarks are being ticked
One point I'll give to the "single white male" agenda though is that they've withheld this kid's identity because he isn't white
So now my gut feeling has become: that this is clearly an op. Google's sensitive events policy has been active for 2 months(?) now?... So maybe this is a test in gauging response and altering records shortly. This also comes as Australia is going have the digital extremism bill amendment in June/July. So the more shit like this happens the more "support" this bill will probably get.
It's an attack on single white men first, but then it'll be all men, and then anyone who they wanna classify as a threat. Legally speaking.
Yep, clearly an agenda had to be pushed. So many ripe details to do so. I'll relist below what I said in another post (as reported by Aussie news):
single white male. Wearing a football jersey to make it more blatant
history of mental illness (schizo)
targeted women
his father was heavily religious
put down by a stunning & brave middle-aged white female police officer
was KNOWN by authorities for years and not dealt with in the past
stabbed a baby
Aussie news media now calling him a "mass murderer" after killing 6 people. Trying to really elevate his evil status
perhaps. but that's a decent list of pivots that could be made should the authorities want to shift blame onto either of them
So last night there was another stabbing incident in Sydney
A brown teenager who is
Muslim
motivated by religious anger toward a church priest's comments on Islam
now classified as a terrorism event
police looking into his online history
So within a few days the other checkmarks are being ticked
One point I'll give to the "single white male" agenda though is that they've withheld this kid's identity because he isn't white
So now my gut feeling has become: that this is clearly an op. Google's sensitive events policy has been active for 2 months(?) now?... So maybe this is a test in gauging response and altering records shortly. This also comes as Australia is going have the digital extremism bill amendment in June/July. So the more shit like this happens the more "support" this bill will probably get.
It's an attack on single white men first, but then it'll be all men, and then anyone who they wanna classify as a threat. Legally speaking.