Scott Adams asking the important question
(twitter.com)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
There's more to it, imo.
If you breakdown the statistics, you'll see that women who are married to men tend to be conservative and in alignment with their husbands. It's single women that have significantly different beliefs.
Immigrants tend to come already married and/or they bring a wife/gf from their home country, eventually. This leads to the women among non-whites often being in alignment with their husbands. I imagine if you tracked 2nd and 3rd generation immigrant women, you'd start to see a trend where in general the women and men deviated in beliefs because you'd start to see more single women in the 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants.
Furthermore, immigrants don't tend to vote the correct people in power because immigrants don't understand the politics in the domestic countries. Leftists are good at lip-services and immigrants tend to believe them so in general immigrants tend to be leftists, simply because immigrants do not understand things and are often less intelligent than domestic whites. That means the immigrant men and women will often vote the same way even if the men should be voting a different way due to a lack of understanding and how the immigrants are easier to trick politically.
The problem isn't that white men and women are being specifically targeted to have opposing beliefs. The problem is that feminism itself which leads to increased single white women causes a divide. Immigrants have less exposure to feminism when they first arrive but the longer the stay the more these immigrants start to align to the feminism of the domestic white women.
Feminism is the root problem. Women that get married young to a man have no issues. It's the single "strong independent" women who are a problem.
From what I’ve seen even the “married” metric is divided further. It definitely was the case 20 years ago, but the more marriage has been seen as a 5-10 year stint for women to then walk away with men’s money the more that political divide grows. The lifetime marriages I would say you’re 100% correct on.
Accurate. And I really don’t know how politically divided marriages stay together.
They probably don’t.
Is this really true for the Strong Independent whores who ride the cock carousel until they're pushing 40 then marry some beta and steal his assets? It seems it might be true in areas where people marry young, but those are conservative areas anyway, so are the husband's beliefs really a factor there either?
Yes, when women are pushing 40 and marry a man it does change things. Let me explain:
When women are single, the last thing a woman wants is an economy that aligns resources to competence because a single women would get less resources. Thus, she wants to vote for communism where the more competent men are taxed more and the wealth redistributed to the less competent people (the single strong independent women). Not to mention, a lot of the Dark Triad men she loves have 0 skills besides selling drugs and getting tattoos. The most communist the society, the more resources her Dark Triad fuck toy gets also. And it's all by taxing beta bucks men that she wants nothing to do with.
When she's 40yo and marries a beta bucks man, she sees his resources as hers. She's also tired of working herself and wants to live off beta bucks. It's now in her interest to vote for an economy that aligns resources with competence instead of communism because the beta bucks dude she married would get more resources for her if the economy aligned resource distribution toward competence.
You see...
You can break it down by age though. Of the few women who marry young tend to be from much more conservative households and are less exposed to feminism.
Yeah, I'm not saying "getting married fixes the problem". More like, feminists are less likely to get married. My conclusion was that the problem is feminism, ultimately. The fix is simple. DO NOT LET WOMEN VOTE. The end.
Leftism is the ideology of the inferior. It takes the dregs and tells them their inferiority is someone else's fault.
Thus, political differences between sexes are less stratified among the inferior races, since they have less room for gaps at the bottom.
The inferior on the one end and The Anointed (wannabe dictators) on the other end.
No. Not even close. The sex divide is very substantial across all groups in the US, and among women, the divide is primarily between married women and single women.
One of the clearest examples of this is Donald Trump's support among American blacks. Back in 2019, support among black men had peaked at 45%, his approval rating among black women was 2%.
The way that an authroritarian system tends to work is that it monopolizes status and power to the authority, and effectively cucks men and creates an out-of-control hypergamy, and harems for the elites. It also does everything in it's power to tamp down on ambition and aggression, which are more common in men. Women hypergamize because they are basically substituting men with the government as provider and protector.
This falls apart with married women because a single man who is devoted to you is a lot more responsive and accountable than the bureaucratic state.
Omorosa wept.
Because all her dates kept asking to meet Trump.
Black women are the least desirable worldwide for a reason.
American Black women.
And it's because of the culture they are raised in.
I thought married white women and single ones voted very differently. I know women seem to be more liberal across the board. I know black men vote slightly more conservative than black women.
I don't think so, but I've never seen political demographic data for other countries either. I imagine there are groups in some European countries and maybe South Korea where this happens.
The thing making our case notable may just be how extreme the polarization is here, especially exacerbated by having only 2 major parties and a hot debate about abortion legality.
There’s no actual debate over abortion, it’s just women screeching and men caving.
The debate of abortion is now at the state level (where it belonged from the beginning). If they have a problem they should take it up with their state governments. I'm not pro-choice except for maybe the rare scenarios (rape, incest, etc) but these bitches want to kill unborn as far as weeks before them actually giving birth.
Just goes to show it's never about reason or compromise. They want to spread their legs to random thugs, try to baby trap, then, when it falls through, to sacrifice the unborn in any way they want and it's "oppression" to say otherwise. And on top of all that, make everyone else pay for it
South Korea very much so.
Western white women are retarded and should be treated like the children they are.