I actually agree that tradwives are a grift, but naturally the retarded author is completely wrong about why they're a grift. The real problem is that it's just a marketing trick that whores are using to attract divorce rape victims. It's aimed at men who are smart enough to stay away from obvious feminists but refuse to accept that AWALT means AWALT. There's nothing "trad" about state power giving the woman absolute power in a relationshit. Tradwives will never be anything except a scam as long as the culture and divorce laws remain unfixed.
they're contributing to the male loneliness epidemic, by discouraging young men from developing the skills and mindset they need to get a real girlfriend
Is the author suggesting that young men take up drug dealing? That's pretty much the only way non-Chads are able to get women without being a betabuxxing simp.
An entire industry of right-wing grifters, from Ben Shapiro to Jordan Peterson to Andrew Tate, are making a mint by exploiting young men who are desperate to hear that the problem isn't that they're sexist, it's that women don't like sexism.
Women are completely fine with Chad and Tyrone being sexists. Their hatred of all the other men has nothing to do with sexism and everything to do with the fact that those men don't give them the tingles.
Instead, men would be better served if they had a more realistic view of dating and relationships.
We have a very realistic view of dating and relationshits. That's why we're either looking for something better or walking away entirely.
We have a very realistic view of dating and relationships.
The biggest mistake the feminist media made in the last three decades was not shutting down the 50 Shades fandom the second they saw it. Trashy harlequin romance is nothing new, but allowing a trashy harlequin romance stripped of all pretenses to reach the level of cultural awareness was devastating.
Women are completely fine with Chad and Tyrone being sexists. Their hatred of all the other men has nothing to do with sexism and everything to do with the fact that those men don't give them the tingles.
Jonathan Haidt mentions this phenomenon in his book 'The Happiness Hypothesis', I believe. The dangerous types are for wild adventures and sex, and the other type is to settle down and have kids with.
You need to work on your 'good dad material' vibe. ;)
The dangerous types would've been conquerors and raiders in the past. It's women's survival instinct, telling them to fuck the men now to get ahead of the curve and secure her place in the new society, while the old one is set aflame.
Amanda Marcotte is a well known name to those of us who were denizens of the early 2000s blogosphere. She was also a blogger at the time, and the 2008 Presidential campaign of John Edwards (yes, that john Edwards, the one who had a kid with a mistress and flamed out of politics) hired her as their official campaign blogger, which was a big deal at the time.
Her schtick back then was what we now call 3rd wave radical feminism, (see here for the drama when she resigned from the Edwards campaign. Note the boilerplate radfem quotes.)
I note that this entire story is written from the radfem position, which is very old hat for her. She was full of shit back then, and I see that nothing has changed.
She was full of shit back then, and I see that nothing has changed.
I was going to say that hitting the wall tends to make women less rational, not more, but I did some digging and realized that this bitter hag somehow managed to lock down a husband. The dude's asshole must have the diameter of a softball.
I mean I'd love a 'trad wife' but rather than get the 'Chinese knockoff' versions being peddled here I'd like to get the originals which means getting a time machine or going to somewhere DEEPLY religious.
Anywhere else and you risk a 'jekyll and Hyde' situation..
I don't doubt the grifting element for a second just as in the same way we all know that Thottery is purely about encouraging simp behaviour. At the same time this is probably the first wholesome trend to come out of modern day internet for years so of course feminists have to shit on it as opposed to the actual prostitution they promote as women's liberation on OnlyFans.
"Trad Wives Are Triggering Feminists," according to the YouTube channel for Daily Wire contributor Brett Cooper, who has 3.75 million subscribers.
"Angry Feminist Compares Tradwives to Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists," screams the headline from the YouTube channel for Michael Knowles, a far-right troll with 1.75 million subscribers.
"This Video Is Triggering All The Feminists," declares the headline of a video defense of tradwives from right-wing grifter Amala Ekpunobi, who has 1.7 million subscribers.
All they are doing is baiting for shit like this article, and this dumb bitch couldn't resist. This garbage is like watching the worst professional wrestling feud ever. Kayfabe is dead.
So I just kind of woke up after doing a ton of 3D modelling studying, thank fuck I got my coffee. As near as I can work out the moron who wrote this article doesn't actually explain why this is bad for men or as the subheader puts it is 'exacerbating male loneliness'. She just declares it's bad and then moves on.
The most she explains is claiming that it's bad for men because women don't appreciate it and we know this is a fucking lie because there are quite a few women out there despite the amount of feminist propaganda who do want to live the trad lifestyle and now they're not being shy about it because they know.
This article is shit but then again it's the Salon, however you can go onto almost any major publication now and it's always filled with these rambling idiots going off about people they don't like as if they're writing a personal blog and not giving you any real information. See Yahoo News, MSN and then even the major crap like BBC and Guardian it's all the same. Feminists bleating about some trend happening with men that they personally don't like and claiming this is bad but we're not going to explain why because it would mean admitting we just don't like it and we're petty.
The core of her argument seems to be that it's bad for men because having standards when trying to date will turn them into incels, since the majority of young women are unable or unwilling to meet the barest minimum of reciprocation. And she apparently expects many men to lack the self respect to realize better to be celibate than a simp.
Which is especially funny as she continues to coach more and more women into femceldom by expecting egoless, 6+ foot, simpering manslaves with 7 figure bank accounts to be breaking down their doors. It doesn't even matter if they're useless and barely housebroken, he'll want nothing from them but the opportunity to work himself into an early grave to grant them the opportunity to get fat and bitch about men online.
You're being very generous there so you must be in a good mood because to me she wasn't even that coherent LOL. It's this shitty blog-esque writing style that many of these SJW have adopted and are clearly taught from their time in university or they learn on the job and it's cancer. Worse is when you see the Buzzfeed style shit where they throw in emojis and shitty normie gifs in an effort to seem quirky and they don't realise it makes them look like douchebags.
Yeah I get she's whining about men having standards but as you rightly point out though. The standards women have are completely fucking retarded and like a lot of modern leftist women she has zero self-awareness but I think also she doesn't know a lot about this topic and was just writing whatever to fill in her article quota.
This is also why more and more I'm against 'debate' and breadtube shite because the fact is we live in the age of factory produced click-bait and rage bait and none of these people who spam this propaganda have any interest in chatting to people outside of their bubble and their seems to be a sizeable community on alt-tech sites and elsewhere that haven't worked that out yet.
Unless of course this is just having a rant and de-stressing which I kind of get I just always think there's infinitely better things to do with your time than debunking leftist NPCs. I guarantee you that this woman wrote this crap, finished her day and then went off to starbucks scroll through twitter.
I actually agree that tradwives are a grift, but naturally the retarded author is completely wrong about why they're a grift. The real problem is that it's just a marketing trick that whores are using to attract divorce rape victims. It's aimed at men who are smart enough to stay away from obvious feminists but refuse to accept that AWALT means AWALT. There's nothing "trad" about state power giving the woman absolute power in a relationshit. Tradwives will never be anything except a scam as long as the culture and divorce laws remain unfixed.
Is the author suggesting that young men take up drug dealing? That's pretty much the only way non-Chads are able to get women without being a betabuxxing simp.
Women are completely fine with Chad and Tyrone being sexists. Their hatred of all the other men has nothing to do with sexism and everything to do with the fact that those men don't give them the tingles.
We have a very realistic view of dating and relationshits. That's why we're either looking for something better or walking away entirely.
The biggest mistake the feminist media made in the last three decades was not shutting down the 50 Shades fandom the second they saw it. Trashy harlequin romance is nothing new, but allowing a trashy harlequin romance stripped of all pretenses to reach the level of cultural awareness was devastating.
The real secret to getting a 'trad wife' is just dating a 20 year old when you're 30. Worked for me.
Same age difference here. Can confirm.
It's like women are not genetically programmed to respect men their age.
Wait until women become 30-year-old roasties. Then you will see real vitriol against men their own age.
This is why bitter, unfuckable older women want to make it culturally illegal for men over 30 to date women under 30.
"Why do we have so many Down syndrome and autistic children?"
She's already got mileage at that point.
I also know guys who had female "friends" who were 16, then suddenly upgraded to GF on their 18th birthdays.
You do the best you can.
16 is still acceptable in most of the world
Jonathan Haidt mentions this phenomenon in his book 'The Happiness Hypothesis', I believe. The dangerous types are for wild adventures and sex, and the other type is to settle down and have kids with.
You need to work on your 'good dad material' vibe. ;)
The dangerous types would've been conquerors and raiders in the past. It's women's survival instinct, telling them to fuck the men now to get ahead of the curve and secure her place in the new society, while the old one is set aflame.
Amanda Marcotte is a well known name to those of us who were denizens of the early 2000s blogosphere. She was also a blogger at the time, and the 2008 Presidential campaign of John Edwards (yes, that john Edwards, the one who had a kid with a mistress and flamed out of politics) hired her as their official campaign blogger, which was a big deal at the time.
Her schtick back then was what we now call 3rd wave radical feminism, (see here for the drama when she resigned from the Edwards campaign. Note the boilerplate radfem quotes.)
I note that this entire story is written from the radfem position, which is very old hat for her. She was full of shit back then, and I see that nothing has changed.
I was going to say that hitting the wall tends to make women less rational, not more, but I did some digging and realized that this bitter hag somehow managed to lock down a husband. The dude's asshole must have the diameter of a softball.
Oh fuck it's her? I gotta see this one.
I haven't seen her name in a while. I used to go mess with her
I mean I'd love a 'trad wife' but rather than get the 'Chinese knockoff' versions being peddled here I'd like to get the originals which means getting a time machine or going to somewhere DEEPLY religious.
Anywhere else and you risk a 'jekyll and Hyde' situation..
I get you're referring to the grifters, but I can't help but be reminded of this passport bro story... https://youtu.be/9P6Cd44or5g
"Those nice pretty women are actually lying whores" is an interesting take.
Explain how this refutes that feminism is intra-female competition again?
I don't doubt the grifting element for a second just as in the same way we all know that Thottery is purely about encouraging simp behaviour. At the same time this is probably the first wholesome trend to come out of modern day internet for years so of course feminists have to shit on it as opposed to the actual prostitution they promote as women's liberation on OnlyFans.
This shit's so vapid and stupid.
All they are doing is baiting for shit like this article, and this dumb bitch couldn't resist. This garbage is like watching the worst professional wrestling feud ever. Kayfabe is dead.
No "trad wife" would be attention whoring online in the first place.
So I just kind of woke up after doing a ton of 3D modelling studying, thank fuck I got my coffee. As near as I can work out the moron who wrote this article doesn't actually explain why this is bad for men or as the subheader puts it is 'exacerbating male loneliness'. She just declares it's bad and then moves on.
The most she explains is claiming that it's bad for men because women don't appreciate it and we know this is a fucking lie because there are quite a few women out there despite the amount of feminist propaganda who do want to live the trad lifestyle and now they're not being shy about it because they know.
This article is shit but then again it's the Salon, however you can go onto almost any major publication now and it's always filled with these rambling idiots going off about people they don't like as if they're writing a personal blog and not giving you any real information. See Yahoo News, MSN and then even the major crap like BBC and Guardian it's all the same. Feminists bleating about some trend happening with men that they personally don't like and claiming this is bad but we're not going to explain why because it would mean admitting we just don't like it and we're petty.
The core of her argument seems to be that it's bad for men because having standards when trying to date will turn them into incels, since the majority of young women are unable or unwilling to meet the barest minimum of reciprocation. And she apparently expects many men to lack the self respect to realize better to be celibate than a simp.
Which is especially funny as she continues to coach more and more women into femceldom by expecting egoless, 6+ foot, simpering manslaves with 7 figure bank accounts to be breaking down their doors. It doesn't even matter if they're useless and barely housebroken, he'll want nothing from them but the opportunity to work himself into an early grave to grant them the opportunity to get fat and bitch about men online.
You're being very generous there so you must be in a good mood because to me she wasn't even that coherent LOL. It's this shitty blog-esque writing style that many of these SJW have adopted and are clearly taught from their time in university or they learn on the job and it's cancer. Worse is when you see the Buzzfeed style shit where they throw in emojis and shitty normie gifs in an effort to seem quirky and they don't realise it makes them look like douchebags.
Yeah I get she's whining about men having standards but as you rightly point out though. The standards women have are completely fucking retarded and like a lot of modern leftist women she has zero self-awareness but I think also she doesn't know a lot about this topic and was just writing whatever to fill in her article quota.
This is also why more and more I'm against 'debate' and breadtube shite because the fact is we live in the age of factory produced click-bait and rage bait and none of these people who spam this propaganda have any interest in chatting to people outside of their bubble and their seems to be a sizeable community on alt-tech sites and elsewhere that haven't worked that out yet.
Unless of course this is just having a rant and de-stressing which I kind of get I just always think there's infinitely better things to do with your time than debunking leftist NPCs. I guarantee you that this woman wrote this crap, finished her day and then went off to starbucks scroll through twitter.
is called trad-thots and they enjoy a different flavor of simpery.
a trad wife uses the internet to learn how to bake the best cookies period. not to discuss politics on a webcam.
First of all, what does "Trad" means? I've seen that used as Tradcuck and stuff like that and it's not clear to me...
Trad is shorthand/slang for traditional. Tradcucks are people who claim to be traditional but never hold women to that standard, only men.
Got it! Thanks!