So I get you’re well, retarded. The psalm verse you’re referring to is of the daughter of Babylon, also known as the Whore of Babylon.
In Revelation 17:1–6, John described an opulently dressed woman riding on a scarlet beast. This woman conducts intimate relations with rulers of the world, and has influenced the world with her teachings. John records the name of the woman as "MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH."
She’s also considered the mother of the Antichrist, so yeah, dead baby Antichrist
I wish you would try to accept Jesus Christ. Maybe later in life. Don't cut out that option for you, as someone who was agnostic and then become a believer in the last year or so, your life can only improve by accepting Jesus Christ in your heart. My only regret is not doing it sooner.
Also drop your pride, you think you are wise but you are just a fool, we all are, humble yourself a little.
You say you are humble but your words do not show it. Christians have to try to be humble, is part of the Bible you don't like. Don't get me wrong, I'm struggling a lot with what is required of me, I may not always be humble, I may not always love my neighbor and sometimes I fail and lust, but I do try to be a better person.
As for your question:
jesus will just fix all of my problems?
The answer is yes. Not in the way you want them to be resolved but He will help you with your problems.
This occurs multiple times throughout - especially with regards to describing the wrath of God. Gruesome as it is, it serves a message - the memetics of your culture will be lawfully reprised and your progeny (in many ways more than actual infants) will be undone in a particularly brutal way. Blessed is it that what goes up should also come down.
I can only ever hope that this type of reproach occurs to the bastard child ideologies of our current captivity.
I will admit that if San Francisco were ever conquered by /myguys/ that I would consider even taking its virgin girls as war brides an act of great compassion.
I think I'd be OK with that city being completely destroyed and anyone even looking upon it remorsefully from afar being turned into a pillar of salt.
Somehow I forgot that we are living in Revelation one pixel at a time through what minute sliver of a tiny timeslice that our fancy little meat computer allows us to discern, fearing that this would all persist and hold together like a poorly craft-glued jenga tower that leans but never falls.
Because post-modernist egregores only like to deconstruct, they don't produce beauty or functional cohesion nor do they possess or produce self-prophecy, they simply do not have the palette, in its place are overly abstract concepts of want for "empowerment".
All things that we collectively value from tabernacle to art gallery captures a presence, an entity that can manifest beauty when lawfully practiced/constructed or something that is both profane and increasingly distorted when we cave to corrosive subjectivity and moral/lawful relativism - it shapes people as it is shaped, recursively creating the ugliest shit it can manifest. Some cultural/aesthetic portals of the west are a portal to "Hell", as it were - these are unironic demons ala "Roko's basilisk" being given collective form.
They will do exactly what demons do.
To dash a great many of these bastardizations and abominations would be merciful.
Everyone's aware that the Bible says some nasty things, and that some of the patriarchs were immoral (e.g. John Calvin wrote about the immorality of the patriarchs).
I'm not a Christian, but I think you underestimate them.
infact! before i got banned from c/christianity. i was told to explicitly avoid shit like this in the bible and focus on the good parts... a mod told me that.
Isn't that support for my claim that Christians acknowledge that the Bible also says some nasty things? After all, if they told you to focus on the good parts, it follows that there are non-good parts, and that you posted some.
most people believe the bible is perfect in every way! so this is just me poking holes in that believe.
Maybe the loudest voices, but that is certainly not the majority position of Christians.
In fact, I'd say that the main problem today is not taking the Bible seriously enough. Putting rainbow flags in churches is an abomination.
i forgot where i heard it from. but i believe most or a majority of christians have not read their bibles. like they read some of it. and have their priest or whatever read parts of it. but the average christian has not read the whole bible.
Not exactly the strongest evidence, but probably true. So what if it's true though? How would that preclude them from saying that the Bible says some nasty things?
yeah i posted some here! but over in c/christianity. all i did was ask questions. and probably bring up! stuff from the bible. but as far as bible quotes go... yeah! never posed any there
Now I'm confused about what you did. Regardless, it seems that you brought up bad stuff from the Bible, and that they banned you for that, which is them acknowledging what you say Christians deny.
true... but sadly most christians do listen to those loud mouths and inform their decisions based on those loud minority christians
Where are these Christians of yours? I'd like it if there were actual Chrisitans standing up for their religion, but very few are. Many are co-opted by the rainbow cult.
Well they shouldn’t say to ignore “the bad parts”. That’s when they need to have a discussion about it although I’m guilty of not studying like I should and I know other Christians are in that same boat. I plan to do a cover to cover read if the Bible and do a better analysis. I’ve read it all but in different secretions at a time
I like sir. David Suchet. I'm a huge fan of his interpretation of Poirot and you can tell he is a good actor when he reads the bible. Is all on youtube.
I'm pretty sure God is perfect and the bible is true. I'm no expert by any stretch but the verse does not contradicts either of those statements. That is not the word of God nor is it untrue.
That is why no one likes you. You reek of edgy atheist that is to stupid to see how cringe he sounds. I don't mind a good atheist discussion on the bible or God, by good I mean intelligent but you only bring up "gatcha" crap that I've heard before.
It embarrasses me to admit but I was not far from you some long time ago although I hope I was never as cringe as you.
You seem like someone who is not just an atheist but someone who hates religion, Christianity in particular. I'm sorry for that, I wish you would reconsider, as I mentioned before, I'm new to all the Christianity stuff but I am obliged to love you even if I do not agree with you, so when I say that I wish you would accept Jesus I truly believe it is in your best interest and that it would help you. I'm not saying that to antagonize you in any way.
Think about it this way, if you thought you knew without a doubt that there is a path for eternal joy would you not share that with everyone?
If ever you change you mind, ping Smith1980, he has been advising me every now and then, he is a very nice and kind person.
The first explicitly atheist society in the world was the USSR.
In the fifties the USSR attempted to create human animal hybrids by injecting unwilling women with walrus semen.
Appropos of nothing, of course. Just thought it was appropriate for the thread.
Just want to highlight this statement it's an interesting pairing with your post
So I get you’re well, retarded. The psalm verse you’re referring to is of the daughter of Babylon, also known as the Whore of Babylon.
She’s also considered the mother of the Antichrist, so yeah, dead baby Antichrist
Good metaphor for the Roman version of Globalism.
Well, autism makes you read everything literally
Sorry what part of
Was unclear to you?
a gay jew hates Christianity... I'm SHOCKED!
Is he dr Jester's alt or something? Why he keeps coming back here?
Jester still has alts here, but I don' think this is him.
You have one guess what part of the Bible the Psalms belong to.
Is he actually a gay Jew?
Please direct us to all your anti-judeaism posts
Conpro would love you and we'd stop thinking you're a cherry picking moron
Are you of Jewish ancestry?
I wish you would try to accept Jesus Christ. Maybe later in life. Don't cut out that option for you, as someone who was agnostic and then become a believer in the last year or so, your life can only improve by accepting Jesus Christ in your heart. My only regret is not doing it sooner.
Also drop your pride, you think you are wise but you are just a fool, we all are, humble yourself a little.
You say you are humble but your words do not show it. Christians have to try to be humble, is part of the Bible you don't like. Don't get me wrong, I'm struggling a lot with what is required of me, I may not always be humble, I may not always love my neighbor and sometimes I fail and lust, but I do try to be a better person.
As for your question:
The answer is yes. Not in the way you want them to be resolved but He will help you with your problems.
This occurs multiple times throughout - especially with regards to describing the wrath of God. Gruesome as it is, it serves a message - the memetics of your culture will be lawfully reprised and your progeny (in many ways more than actual infants) will be undone in a particularly brutal way. Blessed is it that what goes up should also come down.
I can only ever hope that this type of reproach occurs to the bastard child ideologies of our current captivity.
I used to think that the God of the Old Testament was horribly unjust for destroying entire cities, like Sodom and Gomorrah.
Now I think that if there is a god, he's horribly unjust for not destroying the modern West.
Like Billy Graham's wife supposedly said, if God does not destroy America, he'll have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah.
Give it time. Israel was evil for decades before the Assyrians came in and wiped the place.
He is destroying the modern West. That is abundantly clear.
Same. I used to wonder about the stricter rules of the Bibke and why a just God would hunt evil down with some impunity. Now I understand fully.
I will admit that if San Francisco were ever conquered by /myguys/ that I would consider even taking its virgin girls as war brides an act of great compassion.
I think I'd be OK with that city being completely destroyed and anyone even looking upon it remorsefully from afar being turned into a pillar of salt.
Yes, but an act of great cruelty to the captors.
Not just San Francisco either.
Somehow I forgot that we are living in Revelation one pixel at a time through what minute sliver of a tiny timeslice that our fancy little meat computer allows us to discern, fearing that this would all persist and hold together like a poorly craft-glued jenga tower that leans but never falls.
It's going to get so much worse.
Because post-modernist egregores only like to deconstruct, they don't produce beauty or functional cohesion nor do they possess or produce self-prophecy, they simply do not have the palette, in its place are overly abstract concepts of want for "empowerment".
All things that we collectively value from tabernacle to art gallery captures a presence, an entity that can manifest beauty when lawfully practiced/constructed or something that is both profane and increasingly distorted when we cave to corrosive subjectivity and moral/lawful relativism - it shapes people as it is shaped, recursively creating the ugliest shit it can manifest. Some cultural/aesthetic portals of the west are a portal to "Hell", as it were - these are unironic demons ala "Roko's basilisk" being given collective form.
They will do exactly what demons do.
To dash a great many of these bastardizations and abominations would be merciful.
The world is weird.
Everyone's aware that the Bible says some nasty things, and that some of the patriarchs were immoral (e.g. John Calvin wrote about the immorality of the patriarchs).
I'm not a Christian, but I think you underestimate them.
Isn't that support for my claim that Christians acknowledge that the Bible also says some nasty things? After all, if they told you to focus on the good parts, it follows that there are non-good parts, and that you posted some.
Maybe the loudest voices, but that is certainly not the majority position of Christians.
In fact, I'd say that the main problem today is not taking the Bible seriously enough. Putting rainbow flags in churches is an abomination.
Not exactly the strongest evidence, but probably true. So what if it's true though? How would that preclude them from saying that the Bible says some nasty things?
Now I'm confused about what you did. Regardless, it seems that you brought up bad stuff from the Bible, and that they banned you for that, which is them acknowledging what you say Christians deny.
Where are these Christians of yours? I'd like it if there were actual Chrisitans standing up for their religion, but very few are. Many are co-opted by the rainbow cult.
Well they shouldn’t say to ignore “the bad parts”. That’s when they need to have a discussion about it although I’m guilty of not studying like I should and I know other Christians are in that same boat. I plan to do a cover to cover read if the Bible and do a better analysis. I’ve read it all but in different secretions at a time
Audio book while working out. Or going for a walk.
Also while falling asleep it works great if the reader has a smooth voice.
I was thinking about seeing if they digitized the versions read by James Earl Jones or Charlton Heston
I like sir. David Suchet. I'm a huge fan of his interpretation of Poirot and you can tell he is a good actor when he reads the bible. Is all on youtube.
Thanks! I like Poirot as well. Will check it out
Thanks to OP I'm currently listening thru Numbers, I tried once before but it starts kind of slow but becomes a lot more interesting.
It definitely does. Are you trying to listen cover to cover?
I think certain parts are easier to read than others but I get something out of it all.
How powerful the wrath of God can be
I'm pretty sure God is perfect and the bible is true. I'm no expert by any stretch but the verse does not contradicts either of those statements. That is not the word of God nor is it untrue.
That is why no one likes you. You reek of edgy atheist that is to stupid to see how cringe he sounds. I don't mind a good atheist discussion on the bible or God, by good I mean intelligent but you only bring up "gatcha" crap that I've heard before. It embarrasses me to admit but I was not far from you some long time ago although I hope I was never as cringe as you.
You seem like someone who is not just an atheist but someone who hates religion, Christianity in particular. I'm sorry for that, I wish you would reconsider, as I mentioned before, I'm new to all the Christianity stuff but I am obliged to love you even if I do not agree with you, so when I say that I wish you would accept Jesus I truly believe it is in your best interest and that it would help you. I'm not saying that to antagonize you in any way.
Think about it this way, if you thought you knew without a doubt that there is a path for eternal joy would you not share that with everyone?
If ever you change you mind, ping Smith1980, he has been advising me every now and then, he is a very nice and kind person.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech (x2)
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Calm down now.
I was wondering when you'd post Psalm 137.
Post Reported for:
Poster has actually been in the sub before, but never agitated this much.
???
Title is sarcastic
He's more of a troll.
Meh
Attacking religion is not an identity attack, but attacking the specific followers can be. This doesn't do that.
Meanwhile your side cuts babies up for parts today and laughs about it.
👆👆👆