Don't ask me. I wouldn't allow them the franchise if it were my decision to make.
The women who agree with me politically would still have their interests represented, and much more frequently than they do now while they have the false opportunity to have their voice heard. The women who disagree with me politically are the enemy, and I don't particularly care how they feel about it.
I see a judge that needs to be fired
Laws exist only to punish enemies of the regime.
...in a failed state.
In any state that exists long enough.
States, like people, can only exist so long before declining into incoherence and irrelevance.
Out of a cannon?
I’m open to that
Into a woodchipper
Sounds unfair to the volcano.
Active volcano by means of wood chipper?
If we're feeling lenient and merciful.
The real question is: why are we still letting women be judges?
Don't ask me. I wouldn't allow them the franchise if it were my decision to make.
The women who agree with me politically would still have their interests represented, and much more frequently than they do now while they have the false opportunity to have their voice heard. The women who disagree with me politically are the enemy, and I don't particularly care how they feel about it.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
This suggests women are inherently inferior at an intellectual level
It doesn't suggest it. It says it outright, Dom.
Nah. Just make a law that he's not allowed to leave his home because of the risks he poses to society.