Don't ask me. I wouldn't allow them the franchise if it were my decision to make.
The women who agree with me politically would still have their interests represented, and much more frequently than they do now while they have the false opportunity to have their voice heard. The women who disagree with me politically are the enemy, and I don't particularly care how they feel about it.
Men and women have different distributions for intellect, and when you are talking about being inferior you are talking about comparing the tops of that distribution not the bottoms. Nobody cares which side has more retards, we care who has more geniuses.
It cannot be an identity attack when it is true; smart men FAR outnumber smart women, and women, as a group, are in fact the intellectual inferior of men, as a group.
The real question is: why are we still letting women be judges?
Don't ask me. I wouldn't allow them the franchise if it were my decision to make.
The women who agree with me politically would still have their interests represented, and much more frequently than they do now while they have the false opportunity to have their voice heard. The women who disagree with me politically are the enemy, and I don't particularly care how they feel about it.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
This suggests women are inherently inferior at an intellectual level
It doesn't suggest it. It says it outright, Dom.
First, a source.
Men and women have different distributions for intellect, and when you are talking about being inferior you are talking about comparing the tops of that distribution not the bottoms. Nobody cares which side has more retards, we care who has more geniuses.
It cannot be an identity attack when it is true; smart men FAR outnumber smart women, and women, as a group, are in fact the intellectual inferior of men, as a group.