Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

42
Supreme Court will decide whether Congress can tax wealth (archive.ph)
posted 3 years ago by Ahaus667 3 years ago by Ahaus667 +42 / -0
24 comments share
24 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
▲ 29 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 29 points 3 years ago +29 / -0

The 16th Amendment says Congress has the power to “lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived.” And that has been understood to mean that the government may impose taxes on wages or earnings and stock dividends, but not on property or corporate wealth that grows in value. These are referred to as “unrealized gains.”

Investing is now “unrealized gains” to politicians.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 34 ▼
– LauriThorne 34 points 3 years ago +34 / -0

They are "unrealized gains" that's not a term they just made up. They're theoretical gains that you'd have if you sold it at the current price, it shouldn't be taxed because it's not real money.

That'd be like if you had to pay taxes for 2024 on January 1st, 2024 based on the amount of money you could make. It's absolutely absurd.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– deleted 24 points 3 years ago +24 / -0
▲ 12 ▼
– Assassin47 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

Here here. As a "philosophical anarcho-capitalist", I think starting to abolish ALL taxes wherever possible is an incremental step towards liberty that actually could gain support. We need to normalize the idea in the culture that taxes are a necessary evil, minimized as much as possible, with very specific constraints on what they can be imposed on and who makes the decision. Repeal the 16th, obviously. Then find other ways to pay for things - usually in the form of usage-based fees.

I'm also ok with the government getting their cut when a property is sold. What I'm not ok with is perpetual taxation. It's like you're just renting your property from the state. It's very hard on people as they get older. There should be a cap on all property taxes payable by a single owner. It could be a really high number, like 100% the total, payable over time. Or you could outright pay the total tax bill up front if you have the cash. After that you only have to pay a smaller service fee for things directly related to town property management: roads, police, firefighters, maybe public schools IF your child goes to public school. I'd prefer to privatize all of the above but they can work as utilities too.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– RaisingPhoenix 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

At least with property tax I can see their being justification for various infrastructure costs....but as we've seen from most administrations, they hardly ever spend the money for such needs.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– realerfunction 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

it's a tool they have proven utterly unqualified to wield.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– MassivePecorino 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Buddy of mine asked our local government (now seeking a third half percent property tax increase in 5 years) "where is the money going?"

Spoiler alert: they didn't like that question. Or answer it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

It's basically a wealth or head tax. It's just not for the most part progressive, and we don't talk about it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Leftover from people profiting from their property, but now it's just a way to fleece people.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– MegoThor 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

The rapist Bill Clinton proposed to tax “unrealized gains” on home owners that had extra rooms they could have rented out.

Prince John of Nottingham was less of a crook than today’s liberal scum.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Again it’s taxation based off investment. If this passes the government can pick and choose taxation entirely off what they value something as. It’s a massively corrupt metric that will only realistically impact private businesses, investors, and homeowners if the government deems them to be worth more than what they were taxing them at before

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– LauriThorne 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

It shouldn't affect anyone, ever. Unrealized gains is a financial term to refer to theoretical profits, and it should stay that way.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– undecidedmask 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Thankfully we can just end this all now by abolishing the 16th. And the 19th while we are at it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

it's quite simple really: it's their money and property that they haven't collected yet. they have graciously let us rent it thus far, but they will ask for a back eventually.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– captain-shitpost 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

if they're going to get to tax unrealized gains, do we get to use unrealized losses as credits too?

i'm not sure they're ready for this shit. the ebay/paypal thing really set shit off. if you accept a payment over $600, paypal is required to report it to the IRS. so if you bought that 80 inch TV, didn't amortize/depreciate it, and now it's 10 years old and needs to be replaced, you could now claim an unrealized total loss.

for anyone who knows what they're doing with their taxes, their unrealized losses will very quickly dwarf their income.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy