Why is the hard r N word allowed but not "z*g" which is not a slur?
A mumber of users were recently banned for using the term "z*g" in reference to the recent takeover of Japan. But nobody ever seems to get banned for uaing racial slurs. Logic would doctate that both constitute as identity attacks.
The fuck is the other one is he taking about with this zg" one? I just niggers in the same respect as Chris Rock used to use it.
This is because there's a clear difference between someone who just has a different skin colour to someone who behaves animalisticly, extremely tribal that EVERY evil action can be justified because of their skin colour. They cannot exist in society and so require segregation from it or they endanger everyone else like this post yesterday is an example of
In terms of Asian, I haven't seen the same behaviour, it's either nationalistic or ideological, I haven't seen this level of delusion that we see with your blm types.
Zionist Owned Government “ZOG” for short
.....that just seems way too long, it feels like the Jewish version of MAPS. Everything becoming an acronym nowadays..
Our retard janny doesn't like 1488 people. I wouldn't read too much into it.
People got banned for it tho
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This makes less sense than the previous one.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity attacks
Comment Approved: I don't see how.
Pretty sure you can say Zog.
You can also say “nigger”. The word is a disgusting slur, and I would never use it, but this childishness where people act like it’s magic word that can’t risk being said - even when it's in having academic discussion of the word - otherwise Harry potter’s big bad guy shows up, is ridiculous.
Bullshit. I've been called a nigger on here for no reason.
Eh, I don't know the context, but I'd give 10 to 1 odds the reason was probably just to get your goat.
Even if it was from a genuine racist -- why would anyone care if a racist uses a racial slur? It's like being mad that a dog barked at you.
Meanwhile I'll have faggots call me that on here so bullshit
You cant, check the latest Japan related posts, all those removed comments used that term. OP actually posted a link to it and mods removed the link.
Not really. The issue is the implication. https://communities.win/p/16bPj7hN6m/x/c/4Tv8uRhb0T7
Zionist is a political position, but that's not how the use of "ZOG" is intended. They're not really saying "Zionists have undue influence in the American government", they are saying "All jews are Zionists because they are participating in a racial cabal to cripple and control world governments and dominate all races. This government in particular happens to have been colonized by jews".
It's a stark difference.
Are there more reports lately? Like a lot more than usual I mean
"Zigger"? That's a new one.
I say we bring back "negro" and "nigra." Quaint Southern colloquialisms.
Seriously, though, you can tell the reasonable types because we still use "black."
It's not about the slur. It's about the fact that it means "Zionist Occupied Government".
As in, the Jewish Racial Cabal that has seized control of the US Government. That is the violation of Rule 16.
To Identify someone as a "Zog Bot" is to identify someone as a brainwashed minion of the jewish racial cabal.
The issue with ZOG is what it already pre-supposes because it is an acronym.
so...what if someone just said kike instead. IE "Japan has been taken over by the kikes" Im sure that should be ok. Seeing as calling the only black poster on here the N word is ok.
Rule 3: Do not threaten, harass, defame, or bully users.
That rule doesn't apply to him of course.
Calling anyone who is a user a slur might be a problem, depending on the context. That's Rule 15, not 3.
There's lots of White "Christian" Zionists. The acronym need not presuppose a racial cabal, merely an ideological one. In fact Hanlon's razor would suggest this, as the acronym specifically references the ideology, not the race.
The people using the phrase "Zionist Occupied Government" is not referring to Zionism as an ideology.
Emphasis on "entire," which seems lacking in your example.
So, can I say a "Jewish Racial Cabal" has taken the US government, as long as I don't follow up with "and all Jews are in on it," or what?
By your own interpretations it doesn't seem to attack an entire group, without reading more into it than is there. Also, as someone else pointed out, not even all Zionists are Jewish. So, is "Zionist" the protected "identity group" we're not allowed to attack? Because that is extremely silly. If we're doing ideologies, you couldn't cast aspersions on Marxists, or the Gay Lobby.
That's also incredibly silly. Is GAE - Gay American Empire - banworthy too? It's an acronym, that presumes similar things but for gay activists. GAE should technically be just as much of a slur as ZOG, right?
Also, R16 is retarded anyway.
The fact that you are emphasizing that it is a racial jewish cabal is the problem. The point is that you're pointing at an entire race of people, and saying they are in on it by virtue of their race. To make it comply with the rules, you would have to basically eliminate it until you could agree that it was just a cabal.
Jews can be present in a cabal. That doesn't make it a "Jewish Cabal".
Yes, I'm choosing to read into it because I'm not demanding to be retarded. I know what the arguments are, and I'm not going to pretend I don't know what they are talking about.
It actually doesn't. The Global American Empire is exactly that. The American, Globalist, Empire is not entirely comprised of gays, or for gays as a race; but it does push Queer Ideology, which is not even the same as actually being gay.
But, again, how is that different than calling out disproportionate distribution in other identity groups, like alphabet pedophiles or black criminals?
Firstly, I'm just here arguing the logic, I'm not personally making any assertions (at this time.) More importantly, I certainly never argued an entire race. You're basically the only one saying that.
Alright, that's extremely silly. Black identity groups are made up of explicitly black people, by virtue of their race. Asian identity groups...you get the point. So, if there was a Jewish cabal, why couldn't they organize based on race?
Yeah, and joggers are just criminals, of no specific race, and pedophiles are just child abusers, with no specific orientation.
Unless, like other existing, factual, real racial groups, they were to, theoretically, choose to organize that way.
Alright, so why do we allow any slurs?! You haven't answered the base point in OP's post; why can we say "nigger" or "fag," but not "ZOG?"
Basically, the primary point of my argument is I honestly don't get what's special about ZOG versus other slurs. That's my only point. None of what you've said can't easily be applied to other offensive terms. There's just as much of an argument to say that when you say "nigger" you obviously mean all black people, or "fag" obviously means all gays, than there is to say that "ZOG" means all Jews, and thus is (for some fucking unnecessary reason, but that's a different discussion) a banned term.