Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

7
Question about N word usage.
posted 2 years ago by 20Gbot123 2 years ago by 20Gbot123 +9 / -5

Why is the hard r N word allowed but not "z*g" which is not a slur?

A mumber of users were recently banned for using the term "z*g" in reference to the recent takeover of Japan. But nobody ever seems to get banned for uaing racial slurs. Logic would doctate that both constitute as identity attacks.

34 comments share
34 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
▲ -9 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia [M] -9 points 2 years ago +1 / -10 stickied

It's not about the slur. It's about the fact that it means "Zionist Occupied Government".

As in, the Jewish Racial Cabal that has seized control of the US Government. That is the violation of Rule 16.

To Identify someone as a "Zog Bot" is to identify someone as a brainwashed minion of the jewish racial cabal.

The issue with ZOG is what it already pre-supposes because it is an acronym.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– dominatedmastiff 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

so...what if someone just said kike instead. IE "Japan has been taken over by the kikes" Im sure that should be ok. Seeing as calling the only black poster on here the N word is ok.

Rule 3: Do not threaten, harass, defame, or bully users.

That rule doesn't apply to him of course.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Seeing as calling the only black poster on here the N word is ok.

Calling anyone who is a user a slur might be a problem, depending on the context. That's Rule 15, not 3.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– 8BitArchitect 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

There's lots of White "Christian" Zionists. The acronym need not presuppose a racial cabal, merely an ideological one. In fact Hanlon's razor would suggest this, as the acronym specifically references the ideology, not the race.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

The people using the phrase "Zionist Occupied Government" is not referring to Zionism as an ideology.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Kienan 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

As in, the Jewish Racial Cabal that has seized control of the US Government. That is the violation of Rule 16.

SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring.

Emphasis on "entire," which seems lacking in your example.

So, can I say a "Jewish Racial Cabal" has taken the US government, as long as I don't follow up with "and all Jews are in on it," or what?

By your own interpretations it doesn't seem to attack an entire group, without reading more into it than is there. Also, as someone else pointed out, not even all Zionists are Jewish. So, is "Zionist" the protected "identity group" we're not allowed to attack? Because that is extremely silly. If we're doing ideologies, you couldn't cast aspersions on Marxists, or the Gay Lobby.

...it means "Zionist Occupied Government"...The issue with ZOG is what it already pre-supposes because it is an acronym.

That's also incredibly silly. Is GAE - Gay American Empire - banworthy too? It's an acronym, that presumes similar things but for gay activists. GAE should technically be just as much of a slur as ZOG, right?

Also, R16 is retarded anyway.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

The fact that you are emphasizing that it is a racial jewish cabal is the problem. The point is that you're pointing at an entire race of people, and saying they are in on it by virtue of their race. To make it comply with the rules, you would have to basically eliminate it until you could agree that it was just a cabal.

Jews can be present in a cabal. That doesn't make it a "Jewish Cabal".

By your own interpretations it doesn't seem to attack an entire group, without reading more into it than is there

Yes, I'm choosing to read into it because I'm not demanding to be retarded. I know what the arguments are, and I'm not going to pretend I don't know what they are talking about.

It's an acronym, that presumes similar things but for gay activists. GAE should technically be just as much of a slur as ZOG, right?

It actually doesn't. The Global American Empire is exactly that. The American, Globalist, Empire is not entirely comprised of gays, or for gays as a race; but it does push Queer Ideology, which is not even the same as actually being gay.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Kienan 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

The fact that you are emphasizing that it is a racial jewish cabal is the problem.

But, again, how is that different than calling out disproportionate distribution in other identity groups, like alphabet pedophiles or black criminals?

The point is that you're pointing at an entire race of people...

Firstly, I'm just here arguing the logic, I'm not personally making any assertions (at this time.) More importantly, I certainly never argued an entire race. You're basically the only one saying that.

...and saying they are in on it by virtue of their race.

Alright, that's extremely silly. Black identity groups are made up of explicitly black people, by virtue of their race. Asian identity groups...you get the point. So, if there was a Jewish cabal, why couldn't they organize based on race?

To make it comply with the rules, you would have to basically eliminate it until you could agree that it was just a cabal.

Yeah, and joggers are just criminals, of no specific race, and pedophiles are just child abusers, with no specific orientation.

Jews can be present in a cabal. That doesn't make it a "Jewish Cabal".

Unless, like other existing, factual, real racial groups, they were to, theoretically, choose to organize that way.

Yes, I'm choosing to read into it because I'm not demanding to be retarded. I know what the arguments are, and I'm not going to pretend I don't know what they are talking about.

Alright, so why do we allow any slurs?! You haven't answered the base point in OP's post; why can we say "nigger" or "fag," but not "ZOG?"

Basically, the primary point of my argument is I honestly don't get what's special about ZOG versus other slurs. That's my only point. None of what you've said can't easily be applied to other offensive terms. There's just as much of an argument to say that when you say "nigger" you obviously mean all black people, or "fag" obviously means all gays, than there is to say that "ZOG" means all Jews, and thus is (for some fucking unnecessary reason, but that's a different discussion) a banned term.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

The below rules are just a summary of the rules which can be found in the Welcome Ashore post.

.

ONE: Do not post Illegal Activity, or criminal manifestos.

.

TWO: Do not engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.

.

THREE: Do not threaten, harass, defame, or bully users.

.

FOUR: Do not post involuntary Salacious Material.

.

FIVE: Do not post Porn

.

SIX: NSFW content must be flaired NSFW.

.

SEVEN: Do not post Facebook accounts or twitter accounts with less than 500 followers, and personal information.

.

EIGHT: Do not intentionally deceive others by impersonating another.

.

NINE: Do not solicit or engage in transactions that are federally regulated by the US govt.

.

TEN: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

ELEVEN: Do not post spam.

.

TWELVE: Do not post intentional falsehoods or hoaxes.

.

THIRTEEN: No reposts

.

FOURTEEN: Do not post more than 5 posts a day to this sub.

.

FIFTEEN: Do not direct particularly egregious identity based slurs at users.

.

SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring.


Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • ClockworkFool
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - whdws (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy