Why is the hard r N word allowed but not "z*g" which is not a slur?
A mumber of users were recently banned for using the term "z*g" in reference to the recent takeover of Japan. But nobody ever seems to get banned for uaing racial slurs. Logic would doctate that both constitute as identity attacks.
The fact that you are emphasizing that it is a racial jewish cabal is the problem. The point is that you're pointing at an entire race of people, and saying they are in on it by virtue of their race. To make it comply with the rules, you would have to basically eliminate it until you could agree that it was just a cabal.
Jews can be present in a cabal. That doesn't make it a "Jewish Cabal".
Yes, I'm choosing to read into it because I'm not demanding to be retarded. I know what the arguments are, and I'm not going to pretend I don't know what they are talking about.
It actually doesn't. The Global American Empire is exactly that. The American, Globalist, Empire is not entirely comprised of gays, or for gays as a race; but it does push Queer Ideology, which is not even the same as actually being gay.
But, again, how is that different than calling out disproportionate distribution in other identity groups, like alphabet pedophiles or black criminals?
Firstly, I'm just here arguing the logic, I'm not personally making any assertions (at this time.) More importantly, I certainly never argued an entire race. You're basically the only one saying that.
Alright, that's extremely silly. Black identity groups are made up of explicitly black people, by virtue of their race. Asian identity groups...you get the point. So, if there was a Jewish cabal, why couldn't they organize based on race?
Yeah, and joggers are just criminals, of no specific race, and pedophiles are just child abusers, with no specific orientation.
Unless, like other existing, factual, real racial groups, they were to, theoretically, choose to organize that way.
Alright, so why do we allow any slurs?! You haven't answered the base point in OP's post; why can we say "nigger" or "fag," but not "ZOG?"
Basically, the primary point of my argument is I honestly don't get what's special about ZOG versus other slurs. That's my only point. None of what you've said can't easily be applied to other offensive terms. There's just as much of an argument to say that when you say "nigger" you obviously mean all black people, or "fag" obviously means all gays, than there is to say that "ZOG" means all Jews, and thus is (for some fucking unnecessary reason, but that's a different discussion) a banned term.