"BBBC (based Brit bong community) Verity! check - Less than a fraction of a percent of negative responses were considered misogynistic, making to choice paint them as the cause of the backlash disingenuous. The most common complaints were the BBC's poor track record of competency and integrity, which are considered incompatible with being a trusted 'fact checking' organization"
The trolling in response to this - including misogynistic slurs, threatening and hateful messages - are just more proof of why investigating this is so important.
How amusingly naive and entitled of this horrific cunt.
Women and normies being on the internet was a mistake.. men been calling men all sorts of names online for decades. The word pussy is correct to describe this woman.
She appears to have used the word "trolls" instead of the accurate and truthful word that could describe them - "critics'".
Misogyny because it's criticism aimed at a woman. Threatening because they threaten her narrative and hateful because they fundamentally disagree and are at polar opposites with her core beliefs and ideology.
The BBC really does think it is the modern day minitrue.
I think if the executive decision is made not to allow any porn then that is perfectly fine. It's when they allow it then start a moral crusade to protect drawings that is retarded. While there is a dire need for sites that allow you to say and post anything so long as it isn't illegal, I won't shit on Gab for getting 90% of the way there when most places aren't even past the start line. Especially considering there are an infinite number of places to look for the types of stuff that it doesn't allow.
I stopped reading when you started crying about 'misogyny', Marianna Cring.
I stopped at "trolling" because like all idiots in the media she has no idea what the word means
"BBBC (based Brit bong community) Verity! check - Less than a fraction of a percent of negative responses were considered misogynistic, making to choice paint them as the cause of the backlash disingenuous. The most common complaints were the BBC's poor track record of competency and integrity, which are considered incompatible with being a trusted 'fact checking' organization"
How amusingly naive and entitled of this horrific cunt.
Women and normies being on the internet was a mistake.. men been calling men all sorts of names online for decades. The word pussy is correct to describe this woman.
They put women in positions like this on purpose so they can pull this shit when no one likes their lying crap.
So women are fine when they aren't women.
Look how different the comments are on this account where she can block everyone who isn't a pathetic simp.
no, you should be thanking them for keeping it at words.
She appears to have used the word "trolls" instead of the accurate and truthful word that could describe them - "critics'".
Misogyny because it's criticism aimed at a woman. Threatening because they threaten her narrative and hateful because they fundamentally disagree and are at polar opposites with her core beliefs and ideology.
The BBC really does think it is the modern day minitrue.
Imp is always right, he's just lost his mind from the cosmic horror of the revelations bestowed upon him.
She limited views of her tweets right after I posted a comment.
(not because of my comment, the timing was a coincidence I'm sure)
Hate to be pedantic but call these communists what they are, Fascist as an insult is their word.
Gab doesnt allow fictional porn like 2d or 3d porn, so nah. Ill just be on twitter as long as they allow it.
Porn is not free speech.
Coomer cringe
I think if the executive decision is made not to allow any porn then that is perfectly fine. It's when they allow it then start a moral crusade to protect drawings that is retarded. While there is a dire need for sites that allow you to say and post anything so long as it isn't illegal, I won't shit on Gab for getting 90% of the way there when most places aren't even past the start line. Especially considering there are an infinite number of places to look for the types of stuff that it doesn't allow.
True, ambiguous, objectively false (and legally so in most jurisdictions).