“I think we all know what this is about,” Senate Minority Leader Pat Flowers said Monday as Montana lawmakers debated whether to alter the primary. “This is just brazen partisanship targeting a single race. This isn’t fair. This isn’t what Montanans want. They don’t want one-party rule, they want us to have fair elections and this bill is not that.”
No, you want power at any cost and are willing to literally ballot harvest drug addicts and violent criminals to do it. Fuck your “ethics” you have none and will be granted none.
It's about time the GOP shows the same ruthlessness as their opponents. We need to stop being the retards left holding the bag when the other side cheats. An added bonus is that it locks the Dems' Libertarian butt buddies out of the process so they can't pull the fifth columnist shit they did in Georgia. Hopefully West Virginia follows suit. Tester and Manchin need to get ass cancer and die.
Here's an idea: the primary is not an election. It's a vehicle for the individual parties to select their candidate for the general election. The state has no business being involved and should spend zero taxpayer dollars administering it. Let the parties mail their primary ballots to their members themselves.
The only obligation the state has in elections is ensuring every qualified candidate is on the ballot (for the general election), administering the collection of votes, and publishing results. They shouldn't even publish candidate statements, just a list that you mark your pick on. If you want to vote go fucking educate yourself on what party the candidates are in and what they stand for.
Woah, next you'll be implying that people who aren't "chosen" by the DNC/GOP can run for president and be voted for and that those groups aren't all powerful and unquestionable.
I know that. Just as you know Im pointing out the very hypocrisy of doing that. Im not christ cucking. Attempting to justify lying or cheating by shrouding it in an inversion of the golden rule shows that not only have you lost, you’ve also adopted their philosophy, which by extension makes you one no better than them. Throwing out the baby with the bath water. If this is what we become, then winning is the same outcome as losing.
Wouldn’t limiting it also affect the Republican nominee?
Yes. The main reason this helps us is because it locks the Libertarian shitheels out of the general election so they can't play their usual game of throwing the election to their Democrat butt buddies. In a red state like Montana this makes it easier to unite around a Republican. The likely general election match up will be Tester vs whichever Republican gets the most votes in the primary.
Not that it matters, the libertarians have always been explicitly an open borders, free trade party. It wasn't a difficult platform to subvert to Chinese interests.
I sort of agree, but they need to get on the ball. How many even know about the Mises caucus and the reform of the party?
Libertarians with any tactical sense will be trying to ally with Republicans since, at least in theory, their approaches to governing are very similar.
If either party had any sense they would somehow merge or cross-endorse, or something.
Yup, and the Dems implemented this exact system there to prevent it from ever happening again. It's about time that our side starts playing as dirty as they do.
I will say again that many Latinos are now endorsing Trump--the legals are quite conservative. Same with black conservatives, though you won't get them to admit it in public.
What was that quote, something about
"when you were in power, I asked for mercy, as it was according to your principles. Now when I am in power, I hurt you, for it is according to my principles"
Definitely not verbatim, but I think about it every now and then and keep strong to my belief that the only treatment leftoids get now is a "fuck you faggot" because they will NOT extend me the courtesies that I was raised to give others.
It really means "don't start none, won't be none.". If you don't want eye gouging to be on the menu, it behooves you to not initiate. There is nothing wrong, morally or ethically, about beating them with their own stick.
The "whole world blind" cope has rubbed me the wrong way since childhood. It presumes that the only course of action is everyone committing crimes worth corporal punishment, since you only lose an eye if you take an eye.
The obvious, clearly superior, course of action is to keep your hands to yourself.
No, you want power at any cost and are willing to literally ballot harvest drug addicts and violent criminals to do it. Fuck your “ethics” you have none and will be granted none.
Yup. We need to stop showing these communists the courtesy that they gleefully deny us.
It's about time the GOP shows the same ruthlessness as their opponents. We need to stop being the retards left holding the bag when the other side cheats. An added bonus is that it locks the Dems' Libertarian butt buddies out of the process so they can't pull the fifth columnist shit they did in Georgia. Hopefully West Virginia follows suit. Tester and Manchin need to get ass cancer and die.
They do. To us.
Here's an idea: the primary is not an election. It's a vehicle for the individual parties to select their candidate for the general election. The state has no business being involved and should spend zero taxpayer dollars administering it. Let the parties mail their primary ballots to their members themselves.
The only obligation the state has in elections is ensuring every qualified candidate is on the ballot (for the general election), administering the collection of votes, and publishing results. They shouldn't even publish candidate statements, just a list that you mark your pick on. If you want to vote go fucking educate yourself on what party the candidates are in and what they stand for.
Woah, next you'll be implying that people who aren't "chosen" by the DNC/GOP can run for president and be voted for and that those groups aren't all powerful and unquestionable.
Do unto them, as they do unto you.
Staple it on your forehead.
Thats not how it goes. ... As you would have them do unto you. Unless you meant to pervert the golden rule into Islamic law, carry on.
Anyone that turns the other cheek in the face of tyranny will get crucified.
Then why make yourself look stupid by misuse of the phrase? You seem like a tough guy, just say an eye for an eye.
Salty. Check your cholesterol.
I know that. Just as you know Im pointing out the very hypocrisy of doing that. Im not christ cucking. Attempting to justify lying or cheating by shrouding it in an inversion of the golden rule shows that not only have you lost, you’ve also adopted their philosophy, which by extension makes you one no better than them. Throwing out the baby with the bath water. If this is what we become, then winning is the same outcome as losing.
After reading the article, still don’t really understand what they’re doing. Wouldn’t limiting it also affect the Republican nominee?
Yes. The main reason this helps us is because it locks the Libertarian shitheels out of the general election so they can't play their usual game of throwing the election to their Democrat butt buddies. In a red state like Montana this makes it easier to unite around a Republican. The likely general election match up will be Tester vs whichever Republican gets the most votes in the primary.
Ok. Thank you!
Why the fuck do you want Republicans to win? They're uniparty tools just as much as any Democrat. Libertarians are a million times better
That was before the Chinese bought them off.
A party that claims to indifferent or opposed to nationalism is now either malicious or dangerously incompetent.
How?
Campaign contributions.
Not that it matters, the libertarians have always been explicitly an open borders, free trade party. It wasn't a difficult platform to subvert to Chinese interests.
Have you looked at a lolbertarian platform any time in this millennium?
I sort of agree, but they need to get on the ball. How many even know about the Mises caucus and the reform of the party?
Libertarians with any tactical sense will be trying to ally with Republicans since, at least in theory, their approaches to governing are very similar.
If either party had any sense they would somehow merge or cross-endorse, or something.
California once voted Republican. Don't know why I feel like that should be mentioned.
Yup, and the Dems implemented this exact system there to prevent it from ever happening again. It's about time that our side starts playing as dirty as they do.
I will say again that many Latinos are now endorsing Trump--the legals are quite conservative. Same with black conservatives, though you won't get them to admit it in public.
Imainge if the illegals weren't counted.
Orange County has lost its clout.
Good. Again.
What was that quote, something about "when you were in power, I asked for mercy, as it was according to your principles. Now when I am in power, I hurt you, for it is according to my principles"
Definitely not verbatim, but I think about it every now and then and keep strong to my belief that the only treatment leftoids get now is a "fuck you faggot" because they will NOT extend me the courtesies that I was raised to give others.
You described eye for an eye. Did you mean golden rule?
You misunderstand the meaning of eye for an eye.
It really means "don't start none, won't be none.". If you don't want eye gouging to be on the menu, it behooves you to not initiate. There is nothing wrong, morally or ethically, about beating them with their own stick.
Striking a noble pose in defeat, is still defeat.
The "whole world blind" cope has rubbed me the wrong way since childhood. It presumes that the only course of action is everyone committing crimes worth corporal punishment, since you only lose an eye if you take an eye.
The obvious, clearly superior, course of action is to keep your hands to yourself.