Is it really fair to call divorce decrees contracts? Contracts at their core are mutually beneficial agreements arrived at freely and without coercion. Unless the divorce terms were agreed to by the parties and the court's only role was to sign off on it they're not arrived at freely and they're sure as shit not mutually beneficial.
This isn't me agreeing with Imp about the veto btw. There very may well be ex post facto issues with the law, and DeSantis is a lawyer so he would have a good idea of whether it would hold up. If he thought it would be struck down it makes sense that he would veto it to save the state litigation costs. I just don't think the typical divorce can be fairly described as a contract.
I meant that marriage is a contract. If you contract a marriage under the understanding that you are entitled to X amount of alimony if you devote your life to the marriage rather than making money for some corporation, and politicians then unilaterally abrogated that, it does not seem fair to me.
I'm not changing my story, I just chose the most hard-hitting part.
It's a lie on multiple counts. It's not even cited as an argument. Only alimony is, and the fact that it is retroactively affected by this.
No, I'm sure there are a lot of irrelevant state senates that women don't care enough about.
The state senate of one of the largest states in the US is "irrelevant" and "women" don't care about it? Fascinating.
Can't find it. I know I've seen it. I even remember the name of the woman. Barbara DeVane. She spoke with DeSantis about the bill on behalf of the NOW.
You're sure it happened, but can't produce any receipts. I'll go with you getting things wrong again then.
All they're saying is that personnel decisions are not Trump's strong point, which isn't really controversial regardless of where you stand on the Trump/DeSantis debate.
You betcha. I greatly respect them. As high comedy.
90% of people will die of the vaccine
people going for the Pfizer vaccine will secretly get AstraZeneca so that they will die
AstraZeneca will be mandated for young men in the UK
Women will be exempted from AstraZeneca
A 'male curfew' will be enacted
Kim Potter will not be indicted. Then: she will not have her name revealed. Then: her picture will not be posted. Then: the charges will be quietly dropped during a quite period. Then: she will only get probation.
That gang shooting in the UK was a 'fed' false flag which would then be pinned on 'incels'.
A lot of people jumped from position to position as the details of the vax were slowly revealed.
That is also dumb. I've been able to stick to my original position, because mine was well-thought through. It's good for older people, fatsos and those with aggravating conditions.
That said, it's one thing to be wrong, it's quite another to be wrong and then brag about how accurate your predicitons are. I don't think you've managed to ever predict anything correctly, despite your self-labeling as "Impstradamus".
The "male curfew" was debated, and some of the other policy proposals of that time, such as making walking too close to a woman illegal, did pass.
So despite your prediction that there would be a "male curfew", there wasn't.
Kim Potter got 14 months for killing someone in cold blood. Not a bad deal.
The exact same sentence as officer Mehrsele got for using a gun when he supposedly wanted to tase, so your seven predictions were wrong.
That shooting has still not had any data released on the perpetrator, as far as I know. I still could be right.
Didn't you say, when I first brought up the walking too close idea, that it would never happen?
I'm not going to give you credit for something I don't remember, but this does sound like something I'd say. Even in England they're not going to pull people from the streets because they happened to walk too close with no ill intent.
There will be a curfew. I just underestimated how long they'll wait to do it to us.
When you're 90 and in a retirement home (not that you'll live that long with all the heart damage you do to yourself), you'll be claiming that 90% will drop dead from the vaccine ANY MINUTE NOW, right after they pass a 'male curfew'.
I am rarely wrong, only early.
The women are going to make their first invention, the time machine, go back in time and un-indict Kim Potter! Impstradamus will have been right AGAIN!
Can you NOT use retarded editorialization in your titles?
Feel free to be as retarded as you want in your own comments.
Yes, retroactively modifying a contract is unconstitutional. It wasn't about joint custody either, I remember.
Why are you defending a bill that WOMEN in the Florida GOP caucus voted for? You are a TRAITOR.
Is it really fair to call divorce decrees contracts? Contracts at their core are mutually beneficial agreements arrived at freely and without coercion. Unless the divorce terms were agreed to by the parties and the court's only role was to sign off on it they're not arrived at freely and they're sure as shit not mutually beneficial.
This isn't me agreeing with Imp about the veto btw. There very may well be ex post facto issues with the law, and DeSantis is a lawyer so he would have a good idea of whether it would hold up. If he thought it would be struck down it makes sense that he would veto it to save the state litigation costs. I just don't think the typical divorce can be fairly described as a contract.
I meant that marriage is a contract. If you contract a marriage under the understanding that you are entitled to X amount of alimony if you devote your life to the marriage rather than making money for some corporation, and politicians then unilaterally abrogated that, it does not seem fair to me.
So you're already changing your story.
Why did women vote for it? You are a TRAITOR.
So DeSantis' Florida is the only place in Florida not "controlled by women"?
Feel free to produce the receipts for that one.
It's a lie on multiple counts. It's not even cited as an argument. Only alimony is, and the fact that it is retroactively affected by this.
The state senate of one of the largest states in the US is "irrelevant" and "women" don't care about it? Fascinating.
You're sure it happened, but can't produce any receipts. I'll go with you getting things wrong again then.
The weekend has just began folx!
That argument is so stupid, DeSantis didn't appoint any cabinet members because he's never been President...
What a way to out yourself as a moron.
All they're saying is that personnel decisions are not Trump's strong point, which isn't really controversial regardless of where you stand on the Trump/DeSantis debate.
The 1st of many.
DeSantis is the man who will lead the Republican Party into 8 golden years of woke-crushing glory.
Trump is the man who is openly allied with the Democrats at this point, and the both of them are working together to stop DeSantis.
For what?
LOL. You're actually taking the Soros guy's political prosecution seriously? And think he will go to JAIL for it?
Wishful thinking is a helluva drug.
It's going to be a boring election cycle. "DeSantis, DeSantis, DeSantis". There's going to be no democrat.
You betcha. I greatly respect them. As high comedy.
That is also dumb. I've been able to stick to my original position, because mine was well-thought through. It's good for older people, fatsos and those with aggravating conditions.
That said, it's one thing to be wrong, it's quite another to be wrong and then brag about how accurate your predicitons are. I don't think you've managed to ever predict anything correctly, despite your self-labeling as "Impstradamus".
So despite your prediction that there would be a "male curfew", there wasn't.
The exact same sentence as officer Mehrsele got for using a gun when he supposedly wanted to tase, so your seven predictions were wrong.
BERNIE CAN STILL WIN!
I'm not going to give you credit for something I don't remember, but this does sound like something I'd say. Even in England they're not going to pull people from the streets because they happened to walk too close with no ill intent.
When you're 90 and in a retirement home (not that you'll live that long with all the heart damage you do to yourself), you'll be claiming that 90% will drop dead from the vaccine ANY MINUTE NOW, right after they pass a 'male curfew'.
The women are going to make their first invention, the time machine, go back in time and un-indict Kim Potter! Impstradamus will have been right AGAIN!
Like I said, "they're not going to pull people from the streets because they happened to walk too close with no ill intent".
Cause you're damaging your own heart.
Only you are romantically obsessed with her. Not women.
Close but no cigar.