I'm not changing my story, I just chose the most hard-hitting part.
It's a lie on multiple counts. It's not even cited as an argument. Only alimony is, and the fact that it is retroactively affected by this.
No, I'm sure there are a lot of irrelevant state senates that women don't care enough about.
The state senate of one of the largest states in the US is "irrelevant" and "women" don't care about it? Fascinating.
Can't find it. I know I've seen it. I even remember the name of the woman. Barbara DeVane. She spoke with DeSantis about the bill on behalf of the NOW.
You're sure it happened, but can't produce any receipts. I'll go with you getting things wrong again then.
A legal presumption that divorcing parents will share custody of their children 50/50, which also informs how much child support parents pay their ex-spouses.
The state senate of one of the largest states in the US is "irrelevant" and "women" don't care about it? Fascinating.
Well, something can pass unanimously, backed by the president of the state GOP and still be vetoed by women's allies in the right position. Why would they care about state senate positions?
You are literally retarded. I said that it was not used as an argument against the law, nor did DeSantis make that argument. So "fathers seeing their own kids is unconstitutional" is a lie, even "changing custody arrangements is unconstitutional" is a lie, but you didn't want to be honest. You wanted to scream and shill for the guy who didn't even have Ivanka aborted, the TRAITOR.
Well, something can pass unanimously, backed by the president of the state GOP and still be vetoed by women's allies in the right position. Why would they care about state senate positions?
Your understanding of politics is more simplistic than that of a 13-year-old kids'.
It's a lie on multiple counts. It's not even cited as an argument. Only alimony is, and the fact that it is retroactively affected by this.
The state senate of one of the largest states in the US is "irrelevant" and "women" don't care about it? Fascinating.
You're sure it happened, but can't produce any receipts. I'll go with you getting things wrong again then.
It's not hard to read the article to the bottom.
Well, something can pass unanimously, backed by the president of the state GOP and still be vetoed by women's allies in the right position. Why would they care about state senate positions?
You are literally retarded. I said that it was not used as an argument against the law, nor did DeSantis make that argument. So "fathers seeing their own kids is unconstitutional" is a lie, even "changing custody arrangements is unconstitutional" is a lie, but you didn't want to be honest. You wanted to scream and shill for the guy who didn't even have Ivanka aborted, the TRAITOR.
Your understanding of politics is more simplistic than that of a 13-year-old kids'.