A lot of people jumped from position to position as the details of the vax were slowly revealed.
That is also dumb. I've been able to stick to my original position, because mine was well-thought through. It's good for older people, fatsos and those with aggravating conditions.
That said, it's one thing to be wrong, it's quite another to be wrong and then brag about how accurate your predicitons are. I don't think you've managed to ever predict anything correctly, despite your self-labeling as "Impstradamus".
The "male curfew" was debated, and some of the other policy proposals of that time, such as making walking too close to a woman illegal, did pass.
So despite your prediction that there would be a "male curfew", there wasn't.
Kim Potter got 14 months for killing someone in cold blood. Not a bad deal.
The exact same sentence as officer Mehrsele got for using a gun when he supposedly wanted to tase, so your seven predictions were wrong.
That shooting has still not had any data released on the perpetrator, as far as I know. I still could be right.
Didn't you say, when I first brought up the walking too close idea, that it would never happen?
I'm not going to give you credit for something I don't remember, but this does sound like something I'd say. Even in England they're not going to pull people from the streets because they happened to walk too close with no ill intent.
There will be a curfew. I just underestimated how long they'll wait to do it to us.
When you're 90 and in a retirement home (not that you'll live that long with all the heart damage you do to yourself), you'll be claiming that 90% will drop dead from the vaccine ANY MINUTE NOW, right after they pass a 'male curfew'.
I am rarely wrong, only early.
The women are going to make their first invention, the time machine, go back in time and un-indict Kim Potter! Impstradamus will have been right AGAIN!
That is also dumb. I've been able to stick to my original position, because mine was well-thought through. It's good for older people, fatsos and those with aggravating conditions.
That said, it's one thing to be wrong, it's quite another to be wrong and then brag about how accurate your predicitons are. I don't think you've managed to ever predict anything correctly, despite your self-labeling as "Impstradamus".
So despite your prediction that there would be a "male curfew", there wasn't.
The exact same sentence as officer Mehrsele got for using a gun when he supposedly wanted to tase, so your seven predictions were wrong.
BERNIE CAN STILL WIN!
I'm not going to give you credit for something I don't remember, but this does sound like something I'd say. Even in England they're not going to pull people from the streets because they happened to walk too close with no ill intent.
When you're 90 and in a retirement home (not that you'll live that long with all the heart damage you do to yourself), you'll be claiming that 90% will drop dead from the vaccine ANY MINUTE NOW, right after they pass a 'male curfew'.
The women are going to make their first invention, the time machine, go back in time and un-indict Kim Potter! Impstradamus will have been right AGAIN!
Like I said, "they're not going to pull people from the streets because they happened to walk too close with no ill intent".
Cause you're damaging your own heart.
Only you are romantically obsessed with her. Not women.