While they are plenty of male pedophiles, there are a lot more female pedophiles who get away with the rape of boys or girls because they are females.
It's because the media always describes male abusers as "sexually assaulting" or "raping" their victims; whereas female offenders are only ever described as "being in a relationship with" the victim.
Then you have the male simp degenerates in the comments when female teachers rape their students "that kid was so lucky!"
Not understanding the damage it does to society and that child's brain by destroying the child-to-teacher relationship boundary which then leads to all kinds of mental disorders (that pedos call "kinks" to try and normalize).
It's the argument pedophiles make towards children when they say "the child enjoyed it."
Many defend female pedo teachers not realizing how depraved they have become through generations of sick media turning them into pedo coomers.
I remember a story where this 15-year-old boy was groomed by his teacher and she got pregnant then aborted the child and he was destroyed, sex CREATES HUMAN BEINGS it's not some toy for pleasure in the first place.
Maybe we should change the law so that whenever someone in a professional setting tries to use this kind of language modification to justify or lesser pedophilia, instant firing squad.
I also bet she's one of the ones that tries to demonise fictional content as a cover as a lot of these people will try to go 'a child can consent to a relationship but a drawing can't so it's always rape'
Not that it was in doubt but Rachel was born to a Jewish family in New York and can be seen kvetching about the lack of Hanukah emojis on social media.
It makes sense in logical reasoning, feminism has targeted motherhood for the longest time since it's a hindrance to maintaining members and power. What's one if the main components of that, protection and nurturing of children.
If they can remove that even if they replace it with something like pedophilia, they remove an obstacle since many women that become mothers especially with a male partner will lean more on the traditional side than the pure self gratification of feminism.
feminism has targeted motherhood for the longest time since it's a hindrance to maintaining members and power.
I think it's more because a man benefits tangentially from the mother birthing the child, as well as the possibility of the child being male.
Feminists are fueled by sadism and spite more than anything else. They don't need to recruit, women are drawn to that ideology. 61%, to be exact. That's the percentage of women who identified as feminist in 2020, as per Pew Research polling.
If they can remove that even if they replace it with something like pedophilia
It's not about recruitment. TERFs are pedophiles too and they have nothing to do with men. Korean radfems who advocated for male genocide were busted sharing CP.
You just keep coming back to the same conclusion - sadism. They want boys to suffer, and if they normalize pedophilia, they can rape and torture boys. How they'll protect girls is probably another clown car of terrible arguments directed at trads, like they did for transgenderism backfiring on them. I'm sure the tradright would pivot to "raping boys is okay" for them, considering how they defend rapist female teachers.
I wonder how much of the sadists are masochists that never got a release. From just looking at a lot of the fiction that has high female popularity and some behaviours, there seems to be a lot of women that prefer having a firm male hand be in control in a relationship.
Which also explains a lot of the denigration of male role models to stop more men learning how to take charge in life. It also explains why they are extremely weak to outside cultures that have those traditions still.
"Fuck a feminist to save humanity" is not a logic path I'd really want to go down. I'm more of the path of locking up irredeemable scum.
I also think it would be detrimental to society to let them back in, but there's so many that we probably don't have a choice and will have to draw arbitrary lines somewhere that dictates who gets tried for crimes against humanity, who gets thrown into jail and who gets an undeserved second chance.
Depends, if we go full hentai first and 'mind break' them that they are nothing but obedient, mindless slaves, does that make you more in favour or less?
Joking aside, there are plenty of useful idiots in every group and movement, so there's probably a few within feminism that can become productive members of a functional society again. It's just ensuring that those that crossed lines that are irredeemable don't get those second chances.
if we go full hentai first and 'mind break' them that they are nothing but obedient, mindless slaves, does that make you more in favour or less?
Kek. Less, actually. The whole appeal of human relationships is having another person in your life. If I wanted a sex doll...I'd get one made of rubber.
It's just ensuring that those that crossed lines that are irredeemable don't get those second chances.
The easiest ones off the bat are pedophilia, torture, murder etc as I already draw lines with EVERYONE on those grounds
After that, get into the murky realms of emotional manipulation, it's easier to do with guys than women as this is their main weapon so it needs to be at least at a level that catches all the 'honey traps' and sadistic manipulators but not low enough that we're hitting mothers guilt tripping their children to clean their rooms and do their homework.
It's because the media always describes male abusers as "sexually assaulting" or "raping" their victims; whereas female offenders are only ever described as "being in a relationship with" the victim.
Then you have the male simp degenerates in the comments when female teachers rape their students "that kid was so lucky!"
Not understanding the damage it does to society and that child's brain by destroying the child-to-teacher relationship boundary which then leads to all kinds of mental disorders (that pedos call "kinks" to try and normalize).
It's the argument pedophiles make towards children when they say "the child enjoyed it."
Many defend female pedo teachers not realizing how depraved they have become through generations of sick media turning them into pedo coomers.
I remember a story where this 15-year-old boy was groomed by his teacher and she got pregnant then aborted the child and he was destroyed, sex CREATES HUMAN BEINGS it's not some toy for pleasure in the first place.
"These white women. . ."
Huwite women you say? I'm going to bet they're far more chosen than white.
There are an inordinate amount of Jewish/secular women in education.
That's just most modern Jews though.
White Nationalism and taking women's rights away are hardly mutually exclusive positions.
I could stomach those alt-rightoid tradbased faggots if they at least kept bitches in line with an iron fist.
No, they're just pussies who cant get pussy and will simp for any hoe who gives them attention.
White women need to be corrected as an entire group at this point.
Maybe we should change the law so that whenever someone in a professional setting tries to use this kind of language modification to justify or lesser pedophilia, instant firing squad.
I also bet she's one of the ones that tries to demonise fictional content as a cover as a lot of these people will try to go 'a child can consent to a relationship but a drawing can't so it's always rape'
Not that it was in doubt but Rachel was born to a Jewish family in New York and can be seen kvetching about the lack of Hanukah emojis on social media.
we used to burn witches for a reason.
Why can't they just be overly enthusiastic with peanutbutter? God damn pedos.
Pedophilia is a 'structure' and a 'system' now?! Get absolutely fucked, lady.
Correct, and that's a good thing. Wall, now.
This is why the “intelligentsia” goes first.
I thought ''pederast'' was Greek word for faggotry? I believe Estonians use it too.
I thought that as well, but I think Greeks did have sex with underage boys so the line is blurry
yeah pederast wasn't originally an accusation
taps sign
Feminism is a pedophilic ideology.
It makes sense in logical reasoning, feminism has targeted motherhood for the longest time since it's a hindrance to maintaining members and power. What's one if the main components of that, protection and nurturing of children.
If they can remove that even if they replace it with something like pedophilia, they remove an obstacle since many women that become mothers especially with a male partner will lean more on the traditional side than the pure self gratification of feminism.
I think it's more because a man benefits tangentially from the mother birthing the child, as well as the possibility of the child being male.
Feminists are fueled by sadism and spite more than anything else. They don't need to recruit, women are drawn to that ideology. 61%, to be exact. That's the percentage of women who identified as feminist in 2020, as per Pew Research polling.
It's not about recruitment. TERFs are pedophiles too and they have nothing to do with men. Korean radfems who advocated for male genocide were busted sharing CP.
You just keep coming back to the same conclusion - sadism. They want boys to suffer, and if they normalize pedophilia, they can rape and torture boys. How they'll protect girls is probably another clown car of terrible arguments directed at trads, like they did for transgenderism backfiring on them. I'm sure the tradright would pivot to "raping boys is okay" for them, considering how they defend rapist female teachers.
I wonder how much of the sadists are masochists that never got a release. From just looking at a lot of the fiction that has high female popularity and some behaviours, there seems to be a lot of women that prefer having a firm male hand be in control in a relationship.
Which also explains a lot of the denigration of male role models to stop more men learning how to take charge in life. It also explains why they are extremely weak to outside cultures that have those traditions still.
"Fuck a feminist to save humanity" is not a logic path I'd really want to go down. I'm more of the path of locking up irredeemable scum.
I also think it would be detrimental to society to let them back in, but there's so many that we probably don't have a choice and will have to draw arbitrary lines somewhere that dictates who gets tried for crimes against humanity, who gets thrown into jail and who gets an undeserved second chance.
Depends, if we go full hentai first and 'mind break' them that they are nothing but obedient, mindless slaves, does that make you more in favour or less?
Joking aside, there are plenty of useful idiots in every group and movement, so there's probably a few within feminism that can become productive members of a functional society again. It's just ensuring that those that crossed lines that are irredeemable don't get those second chances.
Kek. Less, actually. The whole appeal of human relationships is having another person in your life. If I wanted a sex doll...I'd get one made of rubber.
But where should those lines be drawn?
The easiest ones off the bat are pedophilia, torture, murder etc as I already draw lines with EVERYONE on those grounds
After that, get into the murky realms of emotional manipulation, it's easier to do with guys than women as this is their main weapon so it needs to be at least at a level that catches all the 'honey traps' and sadistic manipulators but not low enough that we're hitting mothers guilt tripping their children to clean their rooms and do their homework.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
Comment Approved: This isn't disinformation, it's an opinion.
It literally is. The top feminist thinkers and leaders were pedophiles same for your precious lgbt