if we go full hentai first and 'mind break' them that they are nothing but obedient, mindless slaves, does that make you more in favour or less?
Kek. Less, actually. The whole appeal of human relationships is having another person in your life. If I wanted a sex doll...I'd get one made of rubber.
It's just ensuring that those that crossed lines that are irredeemable don't get those second chances.
The easiest ones off the bat are pedophilia, torture, murder etc as I already draw lines with EVERYONE on those grounds
After that, get into the murky realms of emotional manipulation, it's easier to do with guys than women as this is their main weapon so it needs to be at least at a level that catches all the 'honey traps' and sadistic manipulators but not low enough that we're hitting mothers guilt tripping their children to clean their rooms and do their homework.
That's only half the story. It's easy to throw the OnlyThots and political activists in the bottomless pit and say that's it, we did it.
What about the women who advanced their careers because men were discriminated against and boys were kneecapped from achieving their potential by women in the schools?
They didn't have anything to do with it, technically, but they are the beneficiaries. It almost reminds me of women's "systematic racism" lie, which is funny because I said everything they think we do is what they do in some way.
Which means...reparations for men? But how do you quantify that which never was?
What do you do with all the corporates and banks on women's side? Do you give the likes of Google a second chance because they're too essential to modern society to just close down? What about Bank of America? What about Wells Fargo? These are systematically important financial institutions, what do you do with them? You get rid of them all and you're left with JPM controlling 90% of banking, flanked by regional banks they're currently bailing out like First Republic and PacWest.
The easiest way to answer both is to liquidate all of women's corporate allies and distribute that money to men and young boys harmed by women's system - but what about the job losses and economic shock?
Kek. Less, actually. The whole appeal of human relationships is having another person in your life. If I wanted a sex doll...I'd get one made of rubber.
But where should those lines be drawn?
The easiest ones off the bat are pedophilia, torture, murder etc as I already draw lines with EVERYONE on those grounds
After that, get into the murky realms of emotional manipulation, it's easier to do with guys than women as this is their main weapon so it needs to be at least at a level that catches all the 'honey traps' and sadistic manipulators but not low enough that we're hitting mothers guilt tripping their children to clean their rooms and do their homework.
That's only half the story. It's easy to throw the OnlyThots and political activists in the bottomless pit and say that's it, we did it.
What about the women who advanced their careers because men were discriminated against and boys were kneecapped from achieving their potential by women in the schools?
They didn't have anything to do with it, technically, but they are the beneficiaries. It almost reminds me of women's "systematic racism" lie, which is funny because I said everything they think we do is what they do in some way.
Which means...reparations for men? But how do you quantify that which never was?
What do you do with all the corporates and banks on women's side? Do you give the likes of Google a second chance because they're too essential to modern society to just close down? What about Bank of America? What about Wells Fargo? These are systematically important financial institutions, what do you do with them? You get rid of them all and you're left with JPM controlling 90% of banking, flanked by regional banks they're currently bailing out like First Republic and PacWest.
The easiest way to answer both is to liquidate all of women's corporate allies and distribute that money to men and young boys harmed by women's system - but what about the job losses and economic shock?