It makes sense in logical reasoning, feminism has targeted motherhood for the longest time since it's a hindrance to maintaining members and power. What's one if the main components of that, protection and nurturing of children.
If they can remove that even if they replace it with something like pedophilia, they remove an obstacle since many women that become mothers especially with a male partner will lean more on the traditional side than the pure self gratification of feminism.
feminism has targeted motherhood for the longest time since it's a hindrance to maintaining members and power.
I think it's more because a man benefits tangentially from the mother birthing the child, as well as the possibility of the child being male.
Feminists are fueled by sadism and spite more than anything else. They don't need to recruit, women are drawn to that ideology. 61%, to be exact. That's the percentage of women who identified as feminist in 2020, as per Pew Research polling.
If they can remove that even if they replace it with something like pedophilia
It's not about recruitment. TERFs are pedophiles too and they have nothing to do with men. Korean radfems who advocated for male genocide were busted sharing CP.
You just keep coming back to the same conclusion - sadism. They want boys to suffer, and if they normalize pedophilia, they can rape and torture boys. How they'll protect girls is probably another clown car of terrible arguments directed at trads, like they did for transgenderism backfiring on them. I'm sure the tradright would pivot to "raping boys is okay" for them, considering how they defend rapist female teachers.
I wonder how much of the sadists are masochists that never got a release. From just looking at a lot of the fiction that has high female popularity and some behaviours, there seems to be a lot of women that prefer having a firm male hand be in control in a relationship.
Which also explains a lot of the denigration of male role models to stop more men learning how to take charge in life. It also explains why they are extremely weak to outside cultures that have those traditions still.
"Fuck a feminist to save humanity" is not a logic path I'd really want to go down. I'm more of the path of locking up irredeemable scum.
I also think it would be detrimental to society to let them back in, but there's so many that we probably don't have a choice and will have to draw arbitrary lines somewhere that dictates who gets tried for crimes against humanity, who gets thrown into jail and who gets an undeserved second chance.
Depends, if we go full hentai first and 'mind break' them that they are nothing but obedient, mindless slaves, does that make you more in favour or less?
Joking aside, there are plenty of useful idiots in every group and movement, so there's probably a few within feminism that can become productive members of a functional society again. It's just ensuring that those that crossed lines that are irredeemable don't get those second chances.
It makes sense in logical reasoning, feminism has targeted motherhood for the longest time since it's a hindrance to maintaining members and power. What's one if the main components of that, protection and nurturing of children.
If they can remove that even if they replace it with something like pedophilia, they remove an obstacle since many women that become mothers especially with a male partner will lean more on the traditional side than the pure self gratification of feminism.
I think it's more because a man benefits tangentially from the mother birthing the child, as well as the possibility of the child being male.
Feminists are fueled by sadism and spite more than anything else. They don't need to recruit, women are drawn to that ideology. 61%, to be exact. That's the percentage of women who identified as feminist in 2020, as per Pew Research polling.
It's not about recruitment. TERFs are pedophiles too and they have nothing to do with men. Korean radfems who advocated for male genocide were busted sharing CP.
You just keep coming back to the same conclusion - sadism. They want boys to suffer, and if they normalize pedophilia, they can rape and torture boys. How they'll protect girls is probably another clown car of terrible arguments directed at trads, like they did for transgenderism backfiring on them. I'm sure the tradright would pivot to "raping boys is okay" for them, considering how they defend rapist female teachers.
I wonder how much of the sadists are masochists that never got a release. From just looking at a lot of the fiction that has high female popularity and some behaviours, there seems to be a lot of women that prefer having a firm male hand be in control in a relationship.
Which also explains a lot of the denigration of male role models to stop more men learning how to take charge in life. It also explains why they are extremely weak to outside cultures that have those traditions still.
"Fuck a feminist to save humanity" is not a logic path I'd really want to go down. I'm more of the path of locking up irredeemable scum.
I also think it would be detrimental to society to let them back in, but there's so many that we probably don't have a choice and will have to draw arbitrary lines somewhere that dictates who gets tried for crimes against humanity, who gets thrown into jail and who gets an undeserved second chance.
Depends, if we go full hentai first and 'mind break' them that they are nothing but obedient, mindless slaves, does that make you more in favour or less?
Joking aside, there are plenty of useful idiots in every group and movement, so there's probably a few within feminism that can become productive members of a functional society again. It's just ensuring that those that crossed lines that are irredeemable don't get those second chances.