make tweets that triggered libtards. also this commie made them worse than Hitler. Hitler was a moderate on the Right/Left spectrum at least, lol.
Gandhi was a socialist which makes him authleft. But the libtards who wrote this book don't know that. All they know about Gandhi was that he was a peace/love hippie who hated violence (which is also all wrong, he was a cunning revolutionary who was merely following what he thought would be the most successful strategy), so he gets libleft. It's not like these people did research, they just went with their libtard gut feelings.
Which makes this chart an enlightening Rorschach of the libtard mind.
About the only one they almost got right was Stalin, and even that's off. I'm surprised they didn't put ol' Adolf further right, that's actually surprising. But, yeah, how are Trump and Cruz that authoritarian, or that far right? And how is Castro, a dictator, not authoritarian at all? And how in the actual loving fuck is Ron Paul basically not libertarian at all?! Or the most "far right" person on the list?!
I'm surprised they didn't put ol' Adolf further right, that's actually surprising.
Because he's dead and Trump is alive, so they have to make Trump worse than Hitler.
The libtard media is already calling DeSantis worse than Trump. Whoever they feel most threatened by in the moment, they call him the worst man in history, because in their libtard minds, he actually is. Anyone who stands in their way triggers the shit out of them.
The libtard media is already calling DeSantis worse than Trump.
Which makes me pissed off at all the people on the right saying DeSantis is a better option than Trump on account of him being more palatable, or something. To be clear, I'm not taking sides, not saying Trump or DeSantis is better, just that DeSantis being a better option because the left hates Trump is a moronic argument, that a lot of people tricked themselves into.
Nope, Trump was Literally Hitler, but doesn't mean DeSantis won't immediately be as well. I wish the right would stop basing so much of their decision-making on what the left thinks. That would be somewhat fine if the left had principles. Considering they don't, it's the most retarded thinking imaginable for the right to try to work around the left like this.
They have their talking points on DeSantis. If he's in government and DOES anything, he's an authoritarian. If he doesn't do anything, he's an economic RWNJ sucking off the corporations.
Which makes me pissed off at all the people on the right saying DeSantis is a better option than Trump on account of him being more palatable, or something. To be clear, I'm not taking sides, not saying Trump or DeSantis is better, just that DeSantis being a better option because the left hates Trump is a moronic argument, that a lot of people tricked themselves into.
The difference between Trump and DeSantis is that the media attacks will work against Trump but fail against DeSantis, because the reality is that Trump is a raging narcissistic asshole who doesn't know when to shut his mouth, while DeSantis is a highly intelligent politician who knows how to fight media disinformation and win.
Nope, Trump was Literally Hitler, but doesn't mean DeSantis won't immediately be as well.
Your perspective is that the media will call anyone the Republicans run Hitler anyway, so we might as well run Hitler. No. The correct response to the media is to run someone who is likeable and who their attacks will fail against.
DeSantis is much better and smarter than Trump in fighting the media. Their attacks on him will be far less successful than against Trump.
I wish the right would stop basing so much of their decision-making on what the left thinks.
That is literally what YOU are doing, while accusing those who disagree with you of doing it. You're the one assuming the liberal media will be believed by everyone who we shouldn't bother fighting them on the merits.
The difference between Trump and DeSantis is that the media attacks will work against Trump but fail against DeSantis, because the reality is that Trump is a raging narcissistic asshole who doesn't know when to shut his mouth, while DeSantis is a highly intelligent politician who knows how to fight media disinformation and win.
As if any of that matters. The media is going to media, and the people who will buy into it will buy into it basically regardless of how absurd and obviously untrue it is. The needle might be pushed 1% due to the truth of the statement, but that's about it.
Your perspective is that the media will call anyone the Republicans run Hitler anyway, so we might as well run Hitler.
Where did you get that from?! I'm saying refusing to run someone that the left has called Hitler is absurd, since they'll call everyone Hitler. Completely different thing.
You have been demoralized..,That's sad. Don't act like a Frenchman in 1940. Find your spine...
Not sure why you're going so hard, that was never my tone toward you. Also, you're either intentionally or unintentionally completely misconstruing what I'm saying.
I'm not saying we can't beat the left, I'm saying we don't do it by playing by their rules. Completely different thing. We don't beat the left by letting them set the rules and terms. So I'm basically saying the opposite of what you claim.
My spine is both intact and located, and I think we can beat the left. I just think some people are being absolutely retarded about how we go about doing that.
DeSantis is far superior to Trump as a candidate because he appeals to moderates better and is far better at defeating lib media disinformation. The lib media has already went very hard on him multiple times and utter failed.
By contrast, the lib media was highly successful against Trump and remains that way. Trump is happy enough to be in the spotlight, even if negatively, so he is terrible at fighting the media.
Don't expect there to be any rational metrics here. I'm not skimming the textbook to find out what they did, but the whole point of the Compass is to find out where you stand on the map by answering a series of questions. The same series of questions has to be applied to everyone on the chart, and you can't rate somebody else. (because just knowing one is being tested or understanding a bias in the question list would have affected their answers)
About the only one they almost got right was Stalin, and even that's off.
He's too far left. Lenin was further left than Stalin.
In my mind, Hitler should be dead center, on the left/right scale, and level with Stalin on authoritarianism. The maximum authoritarian level should basically be reserved for leaders of hermit kingdoms that virtually nobody is allowed in or out of, like North Korea.
There is no such thing. Communism requires the forceful imposition of socialist ideology on the entire world in order for it to come about, according to the communists. People claiming to be anarcho-communist will give up on the anarchism the second it's inconvenient.
But what would you call the tendency in general to favor uh severe government? Communism doesn't go on an axis here because it IS a political philosophy.
Dude literally allowed BLM to set half the country on fire, allowed internet companies to censor his supporters, allowed the media to lie about him and his supporters.
Authoritarian? He exercised basically no authority. He enforced nothing and he paid the price for it.
somebody couldn't decide if Hitler was economically right or left, so was going to leave him at 0, but then figured "eh I'll give him 10 points to the right" for some reason.
What did Donald Trump or Ted Cruz do to be comparable to Hitler for authoritarianism?
make tweets that triggered libtards. also this commie made them worse than Hitler. Hitler was a moderate on the Right/Left spectrum at least, lol.
Gandhi was a socialist which makes him authleft. But the libtards who wrote this book don't know that. All they know about Gandhi was that he was a peace/love hippie who hated violence (which is also all wrong, he was a cunning revolutionary who was merely following what he thought would be the most successful strategy), so he gets libleft. It's not like these people did research, they just went with their libtard gut feelings.
Which makes this chart an enlightening Rorschach of the libtard mind.
What did Obama and Hillary do to put themselves economically 1-2 plot points with Thatcher?
"literally Hitler" isn't just a meme. It's what the left really believes.
Literally above Stalin lmfao I needed this laugh today.
About the only one they almost got right was Stalin, and even that's off. I'm surprised they didn't put ol' Adolf further right, that's actually surprising. But, yeah, how are Trump and Cruz that authoritarian, or that far right? And how is Castro, a dictator, not authoritarian at all? And how in the actual loving fuck is Ron Paul basically not libertarian at all?! Or the most "far right" person on the list?!
Actual insanity.
Because he's dead and Trump is alive, so they have to make Trump worse than Hitler.
The libtard media is already calling DeSantis worse than Trump. Whoever they feel most threatened by in the moment, they call him the worst man in history, because in their libtard minds, he actually is. Anyone who stands in their way triggers the shit out of them.
Which makes me pissed off at all the people on the right saying DeSantis is a better option than Trump on account of him being more palatable, or something. To be clear, I'm not taking sides, not saying Trump or DeSantis is better, just that DeSantis being a better option because the left hates Trump is a moronic argument, that a lot of people tricked themselves into.
Nope, Trump was Literally Hitler, but doesn't mean DeSantis won't immediately be as well. I wish the right would stop basing so much of their decision-making on what the left thinks. That would be somewhat fine if the left had principles. Considering they don't, it's the most retarded thinking imaginable for the right to try to work around the left like this.
They have their talking points on DeSantis. If he's in government and DOES anything, he's an authoritarian. If he doesn't do anything, he's an economic RWNJ sucking off the corporations.
The difference between Trump and DeSantis is that the media attacks will work against Trump but fail against DeSantis, because the reality is that Trump is a raging narcissistic asshole who doesn't know when to shut his mouth, while DeSantis is a highly intelligent politician who knows how to fight media disinformation and win.
Your perspective is that the media will call anyone the Republicans run Hitler anyway, so we might as well run Hitler. No. The correct response to the media is to run someone who is likeable and who their attacks will fail against.
DeSantis is much better and smarter than Trump in fighting the media. Their attacks on him will be far less successful than against Trump.
That is literally what YOU are doing, while accusing those who disagree with you of doing it. You're the one assuming the liberal media will be believed by everyone who we shouldn't bother fighting them on the merits.
As if any of that matters. The media is going to media, and the people who will buy into it will buy into it basically regardless of how absurd and obviously untrue it is. The needle might be pushed 1% due to the truth of the statement, but that's about it.
Where did you get that from?! I'm saying refusing to run someone that the left has called Hitler is absurd, since they'll call everyone Hitler. Completely different thing.
You have been demoralized.
You have bought into the idea that the lib media is undefeatable so we shouldn't even try.
That's sad. Don't act like a Frenchman in 1940. Find your spine and understand that we have beaten the Left before and we can beat them again.
Not sure why you're going so hard, that was never my tone toward you. Also, you're either intentionally or unintentionally completely misconstruing what I'm saying.
I'm not saying we can't beat the left, I'm saying we don't do it by playing by their rules. Completely different thing. We don't beat the left by letting them set the rules and terms. So I'm basically saying the opposite of what you claim.
My spine is both intact and located, and I think we can beat the left. I just think some people are being absolutely retarded about how we go about doing that.
DeSantis is far superior to Trump as a candidate because he appeals to moderates better and is far better at defeating lib media disinformation. The lib media has already went very hard on him multiple times and utter failed.
By contrast, the lib media was highly successful against Trump and remains that way. Trump is happy enough to be in the spotlight, even if negatively, so he is terrible at fighting the media.
Don't expect there to be any rational metrics here. I'm not skimming the textbook to find out what they did, but the whole point of the Compass is to find out where you stand on the map by answering a series of questions. The same series of questions has to be applied to everyone on the chart, and you can't rate somebody else. (because just knowing one is being tested or understanding a bias in the question list would have affected their answers)
He's too far left. Lenin was further left than Stalin.
In my mind, Hitler should be dead center, on the left/right scale, and level with Stalin on authoritarianism. The maximum authoritarian level should basically be reserved for leaders of hermit kingdoms that virtually nobody is allowed in or out of, like North Korea.
"Authoritarian" is not a political philosophy. The opposite of Libertarianism (or Anarchy if you want to get technical) is Communism.
What about Anarcho-Communism? I agree it doesn't make much sense but it's a commonly bottom-left positioned ideology on the compass.
As far as I'm concerned, "anarcho-communism" is a fancy way of saying "hippie commune."
^He's right, you know.
There is no such thing. Communism requires the forceful imposition of socialist ideology on the entire world in order for it to come about, according to the communists. People claiming to be anarcho-communist will give up on the anarchism the second it's inconvenient.
anarcho-communism is a rebranding of extreme libertarianism. no one owns anything, so possession enforced by violence becomes 100% of the law.
It's an oxymoron and only the useful idiots actually believe in it.
That's just too many letters to say hobo.
But what would you call the tendency in general to favor uh severe government? Communism doesn't go on an axis here because it IS a political philosophy.
I don't understand what the vertical gradient is intended to represent.
Sharing is caring vs winners keepers losers weepers
>Trump
>Authoritarian
Dude literally allowed BLM to set half the country on fire, allowed internet companies to censor his supporters, allowed the media to lie about him and his supporters.
Authoritarian? He exercised basically no authority. He enforced nothing and he paid the price for it.
b-b-b-ut he ALMOST banned tiktok before he backed down, remember? lol
trump, cruz, castro, and ron paul are all particularly hilarious
somebody couldn't decide if Hitler was economically right or left, so was going to leave him at 0, but then figured "eh I'll give him 10 points to the right" for some reason.
It probably was created by a Communist.
Obama right wing lmao
Source of textbook itself free online: https://ebin.pub/qdownload/american-government-stories-of-a-nation-for-the-ap-course-791mb-1st-edition-1319195369.html
I reversed the pic and used the text from the opposite page to text search on to find the graphic. I took a screen shot of it in context.
Castro should be up there with Stalin.