It's funny because I've seen more steamy romance novels at my public library than I can count, yet somehow I've never found so much as a Playboy there.
Because they think everyone should act like women. Which these twinks who make up 0.01% of the world think is sexy
Every other woman thinks a guy that looks like a man that can handle himself is sexy, even leftist women. I remember them complaining about finding MAGA men hot lol.
There's even a (not so) surprisingly active porn subreddit: fuckingfascists. It's full of commenters saying things like, "I know it's supposed to be just a fetish, but it feels so good to give into manly MAGA men..."
Real examples from the front page:
I was rubbing my cunt watching the news hoping they’re [the J6 protestors] be successful
My bisexuality should be used only for male entertainment
Y-yes you're absolutely correct, Daddy. I.. I s-surrender and s-submit to your true and just authority over me. Body, mind, and s-soul. I obey.
Not even joking. I'm surprised pReddit has allowed it to stay up for as long as it has, and I bet if it gets too much more attention, they'll shut it down. (Just saying.)
I remember getting laughed at maybe 6 years go for suggesting men would be more sexualized than women in a few years. Now we get completely unnecessary male sexualisation in children’s superhero movies. I remember thinking the ‘nude’ scene with Chris Pines in Wonder Woman was way out of place too.
Literally, just look at twilight. That werewolf guy who took his shirt off more than anything else. That's what is fanservice for women. Women get a lot of fanservice, they just don't count it as such/see it as normal. But showing a sideboob or something? Instantly called out ad sexist.
Is there a name for the phenomenon whereby people think that if they haven't personally seen something, then it must not exist? It's not object permanence, because NPCs clearly demonstrate object permanence. But I mean, so do cats and dogs. It's not quite solipsism, because solipsism is an intentional belief. It's...something in between.
Selective blindness/memory. They know it exists; they choose not to see or remember having seen it because then their narrative would crumble. It's like every time Hollywood exclaims "1st wahmen/POC movie!!1" despite a lengthy history of beloved titles with blacks and/or women as the lead actors.
It's worse, no? They probably have seen a plehtora of examples but they don't recognize it. Like someone said, these fucking romance novels are a massive industry and the men in these are sexualized and objectified to hell and back.
Or the cover of any romance novel
That is what they say when you bring that up? I’ve seen tons of women reading romance novels
And we are supposed to accept that explanation without laughing in their face?
It's funny because I've seen more steamy romance novels at my public library than I can count, yet somehow I've never found so much as a Playboy there.
Because there's a difference between how you do male fanservice and female fanservice.
Almost like we have different preferences...
Because they think everyone should act like women. Which these twinks who make up 0.01% of the world think is sexy
Every other woman thinks a guy that looks like a man that can handle himself is sexy, even leftist women. I remember them complaining about finding MAGA men hot lol.
There's even a (not so) surprisingly active porn subreddit: fuckingfascists. It's full of commenters saying things like, "I know it's supposed to be just a fetish, but it feels so good to give into manly MAGA men..." Real examples from the front page:
Not even joking. I'm surprised pReddit has allowed it to stay up for as long as it has, and I bet if it gets too much more attention, they'll shut it down. (Just saying.)
Getting away from just mocking them (because they make it so goddamn easy), this speaks to a bigger urge to submit and follow a stronger man.
It's just that this urge is represented sexually as an outlet since the left seems to give a pass to anything so long as it can be related to sex.
I remember getting laughed at maybe 6 years go for suggesting men would be more sexualized than women in a few years. Now we get completely unnecessary male sexualisation in children’s superhero movies. I remember thinking the ‘nude’ scene with Chris Pines in Wonder Woman was way out of place too.
Or the sudden proliferation of graphic male nudity on television. More dicks than pussy.
We had male fanservice.
It was the anime Free!.
No one bought it.
Probably because people googled "free anime"
Literally, just look at twilight. That werewolf guy who took his shirt off more than anything else. That's what is fanservice for women. Women get a lot of fanservice, they just don't count it as such/see it as normal. But showing a sideboob or something? Instantly called out ad sexist.
Jacob, keep your shirt on!
Is there a name for the phenomenon whereby people think that if they haven't personally seen something, then it must not exist? It's not object permanence, because NPCs clearly demonstrate object permanence. But I mean, so do cats and dogs. It's not quite solipsism, because solipsism is an intentional belief. It's...something in between.
Selective blindness/memory. They know it exists; they choose not to see or remember having seen it because then their narrative would crumble. It's like every time Hollywood exclaims "1st wahmen/POC movie!!1" despite a lengthy history of beloved titles with blacks and/or women as the lead actors.
It's worse, no? They probably have seen a plehtora of examples but they don't recognize it. Like someone said, these fucking romance novels are a massive industry and the men in these are sexualized and objectified to hell and back.
He's not "Hollywood folk" - he's an Australian soap opera actor who from what I've heard keeps his distance from Hollywood.
This comment is only controversial because fanboys like big dumb blond guys too.