If this all seems unhinged, it’s not unprecedented. In the 1960s and ’70s, conservative opponents of school integration, women’s rights and LGBTQ rights coalesced around a similar narrative. They wrapped concerns about social and cultural change in a grim warning that America’s children were the target of gay people who aimed to “recruit” and abuse them. In many cases, it worked. It set back LGBTQ rights in many states and localities and effectively stalled efforts to pass an Equal Rights Amendment.
Yes this writer is such a disingenuous pile of shit he relies on the reader to not know that pedophilia and pederasty movements like NAMBLA were members of the gay rights movement up until the mid 90s and then indirectly involved after.
They also neglect to mention that the peak of it came under the radfem revival of the late 80s, with the likes of Dworkin pushing that male teachers took the job to abuse kids, to secure a female majority in education that would allow them to begin the now widespread discrimination against boys.
The Satanic Panic was purely their way of finally securing a majority at the high school level, because they're more "trustworthy".
The author is Joshua Zeitz. Let's see what the computer tells us about his past statements.
Historian here. A head of state using a standing army to occupy an American city, compel citizens off the street, stifle free expression and assembly—using paramilitary forces to smoke clergy out of their churches at the head of state’s whim—is pretty much the founders’ nightmare link - archive.org - archive.today
��As a parent who hasn’t taken physics in over 25 years I am deeply concerned by the physics curriculum my daughter is studying in school. It intimidates me, given that I no longer understand it. I should be allowed to re-write the lesson plans.� link - archive.org - archive.today
“@jbouie It’s been my feeling for some time that Democrats should meet the erosion of democratic norms more forcefully. Obama should have said that Senate non/action on judicial nominations, including Garland, were implicit consent and that as of X date, they were judges/justices.” link - archive.org - archive.today
“@jbouie The administration should similarly ignore shadow docket decisions as non-binding. SCOTUS can choose whether it wants to erode its own authority.” link - archive.org - archive.today
“Originalism is arguably a silly legal theory — but by its own shaky logic, it requires a strong grasp of history. The Court got the history wrong last week, twice. https://t.co/6MSsI3HcVg via @politico” link - archive.org - archive.today
And there's another HISTORIAN HERE comment where he attacked the Covington kids... which he has deleted in the meantime but it shows what kind of sick creature he is.
I have a hard time regarding the sneering kid in the MAGA hat as some combination of stupid and harmless. He’s working in a long tradition that begins with public taunts and humiliation but is inevitably violent. archive.today
I know pizzagate is quickly dismissed but I thought there was at least a little smoke there. Also with the drag stuff it wasn’t that long ago that it was understood that drag was an adult form of entertainment. Now they act like concerned parents are unreasonable
Pizzagate is entirely a mountain of smoke, wherein the entire movement then became about trying to piece together what the fire was. Since they were working backwards, its entirely possible they were wrong about a lot and filled in with biases.
But, most critics of it just focus on those conclusions and how they "totally wrong." Without ever addressing any of the huge amount of smoke and redflags to begin with.
Yeah, like they are clearly speaking in code and Podesta is clearly doing something fucking horrific. They never have an answer for any of that, only that the most outlandish theories might be out there.
ERA opponents warned that the amendment would have far-reaching consequences, denying divorced women the right to alimony or subjecting women to the draft
No comment. Just no comment. There's no comment necessary.
The last person to say this was literally convicted of preying on children.
While also going by the handle Dr. Pizza.
Let them all be reminded! https://i.imgur.com/iz2tQtj.jpg
Yes this writer is such a disingenuous pile of shit he relies on the reader to not know that pedophilia and pederasty movements like NAMBLA were members of the gay rights movement up until the mid 90s and then indirectly involved after.
They also neglect to mention that the peak of it came under the radfem revival of the late 80s, with the likes of Dworkin pushing that male teachers took the job to abuse kids, to secure a female majority in education that would allow them to begin the now widespread discrimination against boys.
The Satanic Panic was purely their way of finally securing a majority at the high school level, because they're more "trustworthy".
Plus the whole CIA satanic cult called The Finders abducting all those children from daycares. That'll cause a satanic panic
edit: wrong F word
Finders not founders
I have never heard such bullshit.
https://youtu.be/TCSZ9fsqsu8
Video not available
I don't care what Susan Wojicki thinks.
If it was real, she'd pull it, like the millions of videos that have inconvenient facts about women.
The author is Joshua Zeitz. Let's see what the computer tells us about his past statements.
And there's another HISTORIAN HERE comment where he attacked the Covington kids... which he has deleted in the meantime but it shows what kind of sick creature he is.
"X here" I see he's a reddit user.
Opinion happily discarded.
I know pizzagate is quickly dismissed but I thought there was at least a little smoke there. Also with the drag stuff it wasn’t that long ago that it was understood that drag was an adult form of entertainment. Now they act like concerned parents are unreasonable
Pizzagate is entirely a mountain of smoke, wherein the entire movement then became about trying to piece together what the fire was. Since they were working backwards, its entirely possible they were wrong about a lot and filled in with biases.
But, most critics of it just focus on those conclusions and how they "totally wrong." Without ever addressing any of the huge amount of smoke and redflags to begin with.
The pizza factchecks are all of the form "Did Hillary personally operate a CP ring from the basement of the pizza shop?"
"FALSE. Hillary never ate there and there's no basement."
Sure, but could somebody else have run one from not-the-basement? crickets
Yeah, like they are clearly speaking in code and Podesta is clearly doing something fucking horrific. They never have an answer for any of that, only that the most outlandish theories might be out there.
MMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMmmmmmm can't wait to get some of that WALNUT SAUCE!!
Ask too many questions and you'll find yourself tied to a tree with multiple shotgun blasts to the torso in a clear and obvious "suicide".
Any links?
One guy who did a good coverage of that is MouthyBuddha.
No comment. Just no comment. There's no comment necessary.
"Why hasn't any investigation taken place?"
https://rumble.com/v1c9szb-pizzagate101-ben-swann-pizzagate-.html
myth? they're not making this shit up, they're just paying attention to you.
Faggots want to molest children, it's just a fact.