The globalization of the economy is irreversible, and we wouldn't want to reverse it even if we could. ...But we shouldn't have to erase and homogenize the whole world into a monoculture just to have global trade and communications.
We don't need internationalist subverters, we need the breed of nationalists who shake hands with the nationalists of other nations and don't feel the need to demand that everyone be the same.
I... don't think that's ironic. Isn't that just obvious?
You know, I spent a bunch of time in Toronto, which is one of the, if not the, most diverse cities in the world... and yet, tiny Athens Georgia, known mostly for its College Football team, produced a much more lasting cultural phenomenon than Toronto ever did -- REM, Neutral Milk Hotel etc. But hey, you can get good Ethiopian food in Toronto.
I wish he had stuck to teaching undergraduate "Introduction to Christianity for Secular Materialists" courses and acting as a surrogate father to young men instead of attempting to become a "public intellectual".
It is though. By what mechanism would a retarded organization in Davos seek to 'control the world'? There is none. They certainly are sinister, but for different reasons than 'controlling the world', which that cartoon villain Klaus Schwab doesn't do despite his statements that zey penetrate ze cabinets.
The don't seek to control the world. They already have the control. Nearly every government, every mega corp, every decabillionair are all members or controlled by members of the WEF. WEF is a cartel. They meet to make sure all members are at least not working against each other and their messaging is the same.
Yes, like I said, it's a very sinister organization, but to say that they 'control' the world is an exaggeration into orbit somewhere. The problem is that they connect all sorts of malefactors, allow them to co-ordinate their actions and their messaging as you say, and come with sinister ideas that then get pushed to governments which are receptive to them.
That still makes them evil with great amount of influence, why do you think they are meme villains?
I find little difference between controlling the world thru ideology then some form of secret military power.
TheAlright is a pro-tranny, pro-communist schizo, so his take does not surprise me but I usually like your takes on things.
I don't trust Peterson but the vague idea that we need alternative forms of Earth-scale international cooperation and culture is correct. Globalization eventually leads to globalism, you're not going to get rid of globalization but you can be "actively anti-globalist."
We have to learn how to deal with it with different forms of international alliances, legal frameworks, and trade organizations. Parallel governance has to be established from the bottom to the top. You need a global culture that is not the American Liberal hegemon, but American nationalists will never acquiesce to a system that doesn't make America the dominant voice in the conversation.
For example most on the right want to get rid of the UN, but I think we need an anti-UN. Anti-utopian and multi-dimensional are sweet nothings to my ears.
It sounds like he should be working with the WSF and Public Eye though, were he actually genuine.
JP: I'm gonna make my own club of globalist elite, with blackjack, and hookers!
Ironically, to defeat globalists, nationalists from different countries will have to co-operate.
It's true.
The globalization of the economy is irreversible, and we wouldn't want to reverse it even if we could. ...But we shouldn't have to erase and homogenize the whole world into a monoculture just to have global trade and communications.
We don't need internationalist subverters, we need the breed of nationalists who shake hands with the nationalists of other nations and don't feel the need to demand that everyone be the same.
All nationalists do that. The only people who don't are communists.
I... don't think that's ironic. Isn't that just obvious?
You know, I spent a bunch of time in Toronto, which is one of the, if not the, most diverse cities in the world... and yet, tiny Athens Georgia, known mostly for its College Football team, produced a much more lasting cultural phenomenon than Toronto ever did -- REM, Neutral Milk Hotel etc. But hey, you can get good Ethiopian food in Toronto.
It's obvious to me, but OP sounded critical of Jordan Peterson creating his own globalist elite.
The Russian medicine in him wants out.
I wish he had stuck to teaching undergraduate "Introduction to Christianity for Secular Materialists" courses and acting as a surrogate father to young men instead of attempting to become a "public intellectual".
"Vanity: definitely my favorite sin"
The wef isn't a meme tard
It is though. By what mechanism would a retarded organization in Davos seek to 'control the world'? There is none. They certainly are sinister, but for different reasons than 'controlling the world', which that cartoon villain Klaus Schwab doesn't do despite his statements that zey penetrate ze cabinets.
The don't seek to control the world. They already have the control. Nearly every government, every mega corp, every decabillionair are all members or controlled by members of the WEF. WEF is a cartel. They meet to make sure all members are at least not working against each other and their messaging is the same.
Yes, like I said, it's a very sinister organization, but to say that they 'control' the world is an exaggeration into orbit somewhere. The problem is that they connect all sorts of malefactors, allow them to co-ordinate their actions and their messaging as you say, and come with sinister ideas that then get pushed to governments which are receptive to them.
Come again?
That still makes them evil with great amount of influence, why do you think they are meme villains? I find little difference between controlling the world thru ideology then some form of secret military power.
TheAlright is a pro-tranny, pro-communist schizo, so his take does not surprise me but I usually like your takes on things.
Like a private whatsapp group, with tons of private air travel. Hmmm.
I don't trust Peterson but the vague idea that we need alternative forms of Earth-scale international cooperation and culture is correct. Globalization eventually leads to globalism, you're not going to get rid of globalization but you can be "actively anti-globalist."
We have to learn how to deal with it with different forms of international alliances, legal frameworks, and trade organizations. Parallel governance has to be established from the bottom to the top. You need a global culture that is not the American Liberal hegemon, but American nationalists will never acquiesce to a system that doesn't make America the dominant voice in the conversation.
For example most on the right want to get rid of the UN, but I think we need an anti-UN. Anti-utopian and multi-dimensional are sweet nothings to my ears.
It sounds like he should be working with the WSF and Public Eye though, were he actually genuine.
the only palatable solution echoes the final one.
associated with the wef? on a pike.
Vlad Tepes did nothing wrong?
correct