Feminism in general needs to be dealt with. Sexual liberation is a major part of it, but we're never going to have a functional society until we're able and willing to tell women no again.
Feminism and women's vote only caught on because the men of old kept whoring and drinking while their wives had no recourse. Feminism is just women wanting to sink as low as men do. Not saying "no" to women isn't the root cause of the societal troubles of today.
The issue at the bottom is that people want to be free to do as they please, instead of wanting to be free to do what they ought to. I don't think the root problem will be fixed in this world.
That is the problem. Consideration for what women want.
What women want is to be a part of the top % mens' harems. And to never interact with a man who isn't in the top %.
Civilization requires suppression of womens' wants. The guys who keep the lights on and plan the sewer systems won't do their thankless jobs unless they have a reasonable chance to have a family that makes the sacrifices worth it.
I was never molested or groomed and still ended-up ( perma-virgin ) homosexual. I knew rather early ( a year or two? before puberty ) something was wrong, never told anyone, and never acted on it.
Certainly should not have been "educated" or "encouraged to explore" that as a kid. That would have been so damn creepy. Kick the groomers out of schools.
That said, there is a statistical disproportion of victims of sexual abuse among homosexuals, a disproportion of sex pests, hyperpromiscuity and associated STDS, and a disproportion of mental illness like anxiety and depression.
Disproportion dosen't mean "all of them", falling in absolutism isn't going to help.
It's clear it's tied to a cluster of mental illness, but research on that is now taboo.
The T is a different cluster of disorders, and among the T, the autogynephiles are their own clusterfuck of mental illness with a very large overlap of pedophiles.
Young kids cannot have gender dysphoria ( "be trans" ) because they don't have a representation of "self" to feel discomfort with. It's 100% munchaussen by proxy done to them. Older kids and teens, if you don't encourage and drug them, desist and accept their biological sex in 80% - 98% of cases.
With drugs and grooming? Virtually all of them persist and remain sick. It's large-scale child abuse. They are kept sick, being sterilized and mutilated by "experts".
'100000%' is the kind of exaggeration you shouldn't make, because it's just setting up an easy gotcha.
I don't doubt for a moment that you are going to find girls who hate everything typically associated with girls, and boys who hate everything typically associated with boys, who then feel a growing resentment about being male or female. I don't think you would have to wait for later than early teens for something like that to begin to manifest in extreme cases.
The post 2010 explosion of transgenderism is obviously triggered the mainstreaming of grooming propaganda, but it's not like this stuff can only be a result of some form of grooming or another.
Can't speak for the other guy but I'll start caring about moderating my language to not offend the delicate sensibilities of gender freaks as soon as I can make a Facebook account under my real name with a picture of my face as an avatar, respond to one of them with "there are immutable biological differences between men and women", and not lose my job over it. Until then, I'll keep using comical exaggerations and posting like a normal human where they can't touch me.
I didn't say what I said for the sake of not offending people, I said I what I said for sake of not leaving weak arguments lying around for wokefaggots to dunk on.
I'm sure you have seen countless videos where someone cherrypicks a bunch of the weakest counter-arguments to their position they can find, tears them down, and smugly declares victory to their viewers, while they made no mention of the deeper arguments that target the underpinnings.
Every weak argument that gets spread around is another easy win for these people to use to sound like they're not full of shit.
Exaggerations will be wrong and your being wrong will be used against you.
It's completely impossible to craft an argument that a smug communist can't dismiss, no matter how good the argument actually is. You simply cannot make them engage with any concepts they don't want to engage with no matter how you try. There's no point in typing a well-researched essay when a snarky "lmaoooo" or "rofl faggot" is all you'll get out of them.
For a short time between discouraging/punishing it and now we chose to not care, and this weakness was noticed and exploited. Now we encourage/reward it, and what you encourage/reward you get more of; so we will get more of it until we discourage/punish it.
If that happens the rate will probably never drop to zero because nature isn't binary. But it will drop if it is discouraged/punished.
It's crazy that schools can't even give your kid Advil without multiple layers of permission, but your kid says they want to change their gender - okie dokie, here's a dress you can wear, I won't tell mom.
Good to see this but it shouldn’t have to happen. Teach math, reading, science, etc. when kids get older they can spend all the time they want learning about lgbt stuff.
Nice to see the opposition to denying FOIA requests of teacher pedophiles by law like what Connecticut is trying to push.
Virginia also passed a similar law as OP's called "Sage's Law"
The pendulum is swinging back. Finally.
I just hope the pendulum keeps swinging and people are able to come to the logical conclusion that sexual "liberation" led to this point.
Pendulum needs a sharp edge.
Feminism in general needs to be dealt with. Sexual liberation is a major part of it, but we're never going to have a functional society until we're able and willing to tell women no again.
Feminism and women's vote only caught on because the men of old kept whoring and drinking while their wives had no recourse. Feminism is just women wanting to sink as low as men do. Not saying "no" to women isn't the root cause of the societal troubles of today.
The issue at the bottom is that people want to be free to do as they please, instead of wanting to be free to do what they ought to. I don't think the root problem will be fixed in this world.
That is the problem. Consideration for what women want.
What women want is to be a part of the top % mens' harems. And to never interact with a man who isn't in the top %.
Civilization requires suppression of womens' wants. The guys who keep the lights on and plan the sewer systems won't do their thankless jobs unless they have a reasonable chance to have a family that makes the sacrifices worth it.
Genuine question for you all: Do you all think it is possible for a kid to be LGBTQ+ without being groomed?
I was never molested or groomed and still ended-up ( perma-virgin ) homosexual. I knew rather early ( a year or two? before puberty ) something was wrong, never told anyone, and never acted on it.
Certainly should not have been "educated" or "encouraged to explore" that as a kid. That would have been so damn creepy. Kick the groomers out of schools.
That said, there is a statistical disproportion of victims of sexual abuse among homosexuals, a disproportion of sex pests, hyperpromiscuity and associated STDS, and a disproportion of mental illness like anxiety and depression.
Disproportion dosen't mean "all of them", falling in absolutism isn't going to help.
It's clear it's tied to a cluster of mental illness, but research on that is now taboo.
The T is a different cluster of disorders, and among the T, the autogynephiles are their own clusterfuck of mental illness with a very large overlap of pedophiles.
Young kids cannot have gender dysphoria ( "be trans" ) because they don't have a representation of "self" to feel discomfort with. It's 100% munchaussen by proxy done to them. Older kids and teens, if you don't encourage and drug them, desist and accept their biological sex in 80% - 98% of cases.
With drugs and grooming? Virtually all of them persist and remain sick. It's large-scale child abuse. They are kept sick, being sterilized and mutilated by "experts".
I identify as a star trek demi god.
/Obligatory Q-anon joke.
'100000%' is the kind of exaggeration you shouldn't make, because it's just setting up an easy gotcha.
I don't doubt for a moment that you are going to find girls who hate everything typically associated with girls, and boys who hate everything typically associated with boys, who then feel a growing resentment about being male or female. I don't think you would have to wait for later than early teens for something like that to begin to manifest in extreme cases.
The post 2010 explosion of transgenderism is obviously triggered the mainstreaming of grooming propaganda, but it's not like this stuff can only be a result of some form of grooming or another.
Can't speak for the other guy but I'll start caring about moderating my language to not offend the delicate sensibilities of gender freaks as soon as I can make a Facebook account under my real name with a picture of my face as an avatar, respond to one of them with "there are immutable biological differences between men and women", and not lose my job over it. Until then, I'll keep using comical exaggerations and posting like a normal human where they can't touch me.
I didn't say what I said for the sake of not offending people, I said I what I said for sake of not leaving weak arguments lying around for wokefaggots to dunk on.
I'm sure you have seen countless videos where someone cherrypicks a bunch of the weakest counter-arguments to their position they can find, tears them down, and smugly declares victory to their viewers, while they made no mention of the deeper arguments that target the underpinnings.
Every weak argument that gets spread around is another easy win for these people to use to sound like they're not full of shit.
Exaggerations will be wrong and your being wrong will be used against you.
It's completely impossible to craft an argument that a smug communist can't dismiss, no matter how good the argument actually is. You simply cannot make them engage with any concepts they don't want to engage with no matter how you try. There's no point in typing a well-researched essay when a snarky "lmaoooo" or "rofl faggot" is all you'll get out of them.
Their refusal to engage is proof that they have no argument.
I want to leave them with nothing to say.
No. Without the option for a flight of fancy, people remain on the ground.
No.
Does it matter why it happens? The question is: when it happens, do you encourage it or discourage it?
For a short time between discouraging/punishing it and now we chose to not care, and this weakness was noticed and exploited. Now we encourage/reward it, and what you encourage/reward you get more of; so we will get more of it until we discourage/punish it.
If that happens the rate will probably never drop to zero because nature isn't binary. But it will drop if it is discouraged/punished.
It's crazy that schools can't even give your kid Advil without multiple layers of permission, but your kid says they want to change their gender - okie dokie, here's a dress you can wear, I won't tell mom.
Good to see this but it shouldn’t have to happen. Teach math, reading, science, etc. when kids get older they can spend all the time they want learning about lgbt stuff.
To be enforced by?
Hopefully they create a cause of action, or ideally start jailing people who violate the law.