Here’s a thought: it is very likely that no one will ever face any real consequences over the Rust shooting (Halyna Hutchins, by Baldwin et al. I appreciate that it was accidental, but that really doesn’t cut it), and yet, this guy, who it seems can’t be really shown to have done anything, will likely be found “suicided”, by the end of the year, jail or no jail…
Because this is what our society has decided is “morally right”. This is how “justice” operates now. This is how “winners” and “losers” are decided.
I don’t really understand how people can be comfortable with that.
He's some sort of sleazy PUA/Red Pill type, who's getting slapped around because he stood up to the usual globohomo sycophants.
Only interesting thing about it is how he's supposed to be alt right-- and because he's getting nailed over some camwhore business associations, the whole right is confused as to why a degenerate represents them in leftist's delusions.
PUA/Red Pill types tend to be lumped in with the right because they criticize some leftist dogma relating to feminism or intersectionality only because it hinders their ability to shill advice about fornication to young men. They're not traditional in any sense although some of them might make appeals to that. They're what I call an offshoot of the free love hippy movement.
I mean, he made most of his money and business on pimping camwhores so I think tradcon is pretty far from him as well. He just doesn't think anything of women.
Tates dad was in the CIA. And it's sketchy that his stuff gets pushed so hard on the algorithms. I think he is promoted cuz he can be dismissed as a criminal ,which in turn hurts others who say the same truths. They want to associate based rhetoric with an online pimp.
Hes basically the new Jordan Peterson type motivational guy, but with a PUA/Manosphere twist.
I suspect hes another controlled opposition type guy since hes shilled a lot and his father was in the CIA. Kind of like how Jordan Peterson co wrote the agenda 2030 plan for the UN, who was also shilled a lot five or so years ago when he entered the scene.
Don’t mistake this for a defense of Tate’s behavior or profession, but he’s probably the biggest mainstream red pill we’ve ever had. When lefty retard teachers are complaining about their male students quoting Tate, that’s a good indicator that he’s doing something right. When all of social media rises up to ban someone, that’s a good indicator he’s doing something right. He’s pissing off all the right people, and he has clearly been targeted by the United States government - more good indicators.
Even his rise to being publicly known felt very fake. He went from nobody to suddenly this massive figure that every young boy in West was obsessed with already.
Reeks of a manufactured controversy/psyop, it reminds me of the whole Jack Murphy dealio not too long ago actually. Kiwifarms was documenting his hilarious meltdown & chain of self-owns while then-non-Elon-owned Twitter was gloating about how great it was that a supposed 'masculinity expert' I had never heard of turned out to be an enthusiastic cuck & pegging fetishist. Struck me as a bit of e-drama (which is gay by default) which got blown way out of proportion.
Similarly I'm completely unfamiliar with this Andrew Tate and why he's supposed to speak for me or why I'm supposed to care about him at all, although I did read like five minutes ago that he supposedly converted to Islam so him being arrested in Romania is chuckle-worthy. Vlad the Impaler must be having a laugh upstairs right about now.
Murphy was at least small time enough to be kinda believable. Like his following was tiny relatively, with seemingly only maybe a thousand across the nation who were all using it as networking. One of the guys who attended posted on the farms during the blowup and, if memory serves, he talked about how little Murphy was even factored in beyond the setup.
Compared to Tate who was supposedly so massive that teachers were having to fight with students who all worshiped him because his influence had permeated their entire worldview. Which much more reeks of manufactured, especially with the whole Greta and pizzabox thing which feel far too "perfectly dramatic" and right into their worldview for this kind of story.
Honestly this. The guy was a nobody and then suddenly every single left wing media outlet was discussing him, claiming he was a prominent right winger and watnot. Frankly my guess is they are trying to make it seem like the entire right wing is like this guy, because they believe this guy is easy to take down and embarrass. Effectively strawmanning him into a position of influence he both has not earned, nor actually has
Here’s a thought: it is very likely that no one will ever face any real consequences over the Rust shooting (Halyna Hutchins, by Baldwin et al. I appreciate that it was accidental, but that really doesn’t cut it), and yet, this guy, who it seems can’t be really shown to have done anything, will likely be found “suicided”, by the end of the year, jail or no jail…
Because this is what our society has decided is “morally right”. This is how “justice” operates now. This is how “winners” and “losers” are decided.
I don’t really understand how people can be comfortable with that.
Tate? The 2 minutes hate guy?
He's some sort of sleazy PUA/Red Pill type, who's getting slapped around because he stood up to the usual globohomo sycophants.
Only interesting thing about it is how he's supposed to be alt right-- and because he's getting nailed over some camwhore business associations, the whole right is confused as to why a degenerate represents them in leftist's delusions.
PUA/Red Pill types tend to be lumped in with the right because they criticize some leftist dogma relating to feminism or intersectionality only because it hinders their ability to shill advice about fornication to young men. They're not traditional in any sense although some of them might make appeals to that. They're what I call an offshoot of the free love hippy movement.
Is he the real life version of The Imp?
Always getting banned due to upsetting the feminazis?
He’s nothing like Imp, actually. Tate is much closer to the tradcons, whom Imp despises.
I mean, he made most of his money and business on pimping camwhores so I think tradcon is pretty far from him as well. He just doesn't think anything of women.
Tates dad was in the CIA. And it's sketchy that his stuff gets pushed so hard on the algorithms. I think he is promoted cuz he can be dismissed as a criminal ,which in turn hurts others who say the same truths. They want to associate based rhetoric with an online pimp.
Ah, so he's a PsyOp/honeypot.
this is what right wing nazis looks like! build him up then tear him down along with the right wingers who don't even know who he is
Hes basically the new Jordan Peterson type motivational guy, but with a PUA/Manosphere twist.
I suspect hes another controlled opposition type guy since hes shilled a lot and his father was in the CIA. Kind of like how Jordan Peterson co wrote the agenda 2030 plan for the UN, who was also shilled a lot five or so years ago when he entered the scene.
Don’t mistake this for a defense of Tate’s behavior or profession, but he’s probably the biggest mainstream red pill we’ve ever had. When lefty retard teachers are complaining about their male students quoting Tate, that’s a good indicator that he’s doing something right. When all of social media rises up to ban someone, that’s a good indicator he’s doing something right. He’s pissing off all the right people, and he has clearly been targeted by the United States government - more good indicators.
He's a bad guy. No two ways about it. Not interested in any association with him. Taliban is probably interested because he converted to Islam.
Simple as that.
Wow, hadn't heard that. That's hilarious.
He did what lmao
https://youtube.com/watch?v=LjRYW2ovToQ
They sure like him!
Dude's a scam artist that got rich through conning people and got famous for casting low grade bait to the terminally online.
See, you won't explain too lol
He still probably is. They’ve just very oddly decided to “make an example of him”, it seems…
Seems very “inorganic”, all the coverage, social media, etc…
Much like when Greta first “blew up”…
I’ve been around the sort of activist “scene” enough to know those things don’t really happen organically. All very suss. All of it.
Even his rise to being publicly known felt very fake. He went from nobody to suddenly this massive figure that every young boy in West was obsessed with already.
Reeks of a manufactured controversy/psyop, it reminds me of the whole Jack Murphy dealio not too long ago actually. Kiwifarms was documenting his hilarious meltdown & chain of self-owns while then-non-Elon-owned Twitter was gloating about how great it was that a supposed 'masculinity expert' I had never heard of turned out to be an enthusiastic cuck & pegging fetishist. Struck me as a bit of e-drama (which is gay by default) which got blown way out of proportion.
Similarly I'm completely unfamiliar with this Andrew Tate and why he's supposed to speak for me or why I'm supposed to care about him at all, although I did read like five minutes ago that he supposedly converted to Islam so him being arrested in Romania is chuckle-worthy. Vlad the Impaler must be having a laugh upstairs right about now.
Murphy was at least small time enough to be kinda believable. Like his following was tiny relatively, with seemingly only maybe a thousand across the nation who were all using it as networking. One of the guys who attended posted on the farms during the blowup and, if memory serves, he talked about how little Murphy was even factored in beyond the setup.
Compared to Tate who was supposedly so massive that teachers were having to fight with students who all worshiped him because his influence had permeated their entire worldview. Which much more reeks of manufactured, especially with the whole Greta and pizzabox thing which feel far too "perfectly dramatic" and right into their worldview for this kind of story.
Honestly this. The guy was a nobody and then suddenly every single left wing media outlet was discussing him, claiming he was a prominent right winger and watnot. Frankly my guess is they are trying to make it seem like the entire right wing is like this guy, because they believe this guy is easy to take down and embarrass. Effectively strawmanning him into a position of influence he both has not earned, nor actually has
"Women always win" - Imp I the Blackpilled
Great. Now I'm imagining him as a Dark-Souls style boss, skittering and chittering in the back of my mind.
Rent. Free.
Boss name: Gibbering Retard.
Exactly, my thought as well.
He is still a grifter and it's weird how he can still dominate entire reels on YT shorts. I think there is something else to his rise to fame.