Anyone that still wants Republicans to win is either a shill or a fool
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Here's what's going to happen:
Several Republicans, most of whom won't be running next term and thus have nothing to lose, will vote to pass this, and it will pass.
The Establishment GOP will say, "Oh, darn! We tried to stop it. Please donate more to help us save the country!"
Uniparty kayfabe.
Isn't another amnesty for illegals practically a power grab at this point? If several million illegals receive voting rights... wouldn't that simply entrench the long-awaited Democratic supermajority in every American Federal election at last?
Republican'ts are utter morons. It's like they're doing everything in their power to commit political suicide and bring about a dominant-party system governed by their ostensible opponents.
Why can't Republican'ts support, at the very least, any of the following:
Most importantly:
Instead, they just keep doing on nothing to prevent the emergence of a Democratic dominant-party system.
Maybe they think if they promote amnesty they'll get some votes. Cuckservatives are always creaming over the Latino/whatever vote.
As much as some people want them to be (prominent nativists come to mind), Republicans are not going to be the party of white people. They're sure as hell not going to be the party of black people, the other main native constituency of this country. The general view of the "I don't see color" crowd is that regardless of their efforts, the country is going to be majority Hispanic in a hurry. You either court their votes, or let the other guy have 'em. Illegal immigration is not a simple topic within the Latino community, however I think most of them want to see a path to citizenship for illegals. They may even be pro-wall, but they don't want their neighbors shipped back to Honduras. Neither do, I mean you have a constituency of, Republicans that profit from immigrant labor.
Republicans have supported amnesty in the past, and look where that's got them? Well, they're not powerful enough to do anything for you supposedly, but they're enough in power to do things for them. As bad as it seems to have gone for them, they're still getting roughly 50% of the vote, and powerful Republicans are laughing all the way to the bank.
Indeed, and that crossed my mind when I composed the comment. The whole 'natural conservatives' meme. I didn't bother mentioning it because it seemed intuitive that if the Biden Administration was the one who amnestied them, they would be clearly be beholden to the Democrats and not to the Republicans because of the actions of these treacherous Republicans. A Republican would have to be particularly dense to think that the Democrats amnestying illegals would help Republicans more so than Democrats.
I think their voter base will become, say, 80-90% White, but the GOP will never be pro-White, i.e. it will never become an ethnonationalist or nativist party. This is probably what you mean in your comment: the GOP will never use its 'implicit Whiteness' as a strength, and will always see it as a disadvantage needing rectification by doubling-down on its appeals to other races.
Since the GOP, I suspect, will never be able to attract large numbers of any nonwhite group despite doubling-down on their efforts to do so, they will simply decline into obscurity under a de facto Democratic dominant-party state.
Yes, you're correct in the last paragraph as well: The current crop of Republican politicians probably by and large have no party loyalty and thus by extension couldn't care less about whether the party can still get elected on the Federal level. They'll still be elected in the lesser levels of government for perhaps decades to come, although things will turn against them there too (and the signs of that are already clear in Texas and a few other 'purple', formerly Red, states).
Yeah I don't think they will promote whiteness. The two party system has existed though a lot. I kind of don't see a one party state like some people think is coming. Demographics have switched their votes before. I think republicans will get Latino votes, or they won't be coming close to 50% any more.
One thing we know for sure is that Republicans like winning elections, but they hate working, so they don't want to win too many elections. Thus one wonders if the establishment figures in the party and media apparatus believe their grift is secure regardless of how many illegals flood in.
So true bestie...........
Immigration has always been invasion. The native Americans didn’t have the power to prevent their own cultural extinction at the hands of hostile foreign powers. It appears that white Americans didn’t have the power either.
Republicans are beholden to their donors, not their voters. I keep saying that you guys want the GOP to win elections more than they do. Their donors aren't concerned with the future of the party, but it will probably be fine for them anyway. They'll just betray white people harder than ever to pander to the "New Americans." They don't care. They have a decades long record telling you that.
Uniparty, Gop doesn't even have to bother appealing to cons or their base.
Thom Tillis is the cocksucker working on an amnesty bill with Krysten Sinema.
I don't think it will pass and I really hope it doesn't.
That scumfuck Tillis needs to be kicked out.
Yep, saw a story about one of the (R) Senators striking an accord with Sinema over amnesty like...yesterday on this very site. And now reading about how Herschel Walker's been defeated in the Georgia Senate runoff (an outcome I was already expecting), all I'm thinking is this memetic line. The entire West's circling the drain, just a question of when and how badly it's gonna go down the tubes.
All Democrats support 100% of the communist agenda, while most Republicans only support 95-98% of it.
I've been trying to get through to people here for years that the Republicans are the enemy too.
When Trump came into power there was a brief supermajority in congress and senate iirc. Certain republicans straight up resigned when threatened with imminent success. Trey Gowdy for example quit and immediately became a fox news contributor so he could maintain his hot-air to accomplishment ratio.
Ye or bust.
Tillis and Sinema were always Leftists.
Again, I can't help but see this as further attempts to kill the populist movement that is trying to make progress. Currently, that populist movement is in a war with the GOP establishment, considering that Steve Bannon's efforts have made great progress taking over primary positions, state GOP positions, and local and state government positions. Yet, for some reason, the argument here (once again from the alt-right) is that no one should vote for any of the GOP.
I'm no fan of the GOP myself, but unless I move to New Hampshire, I can't vote for the Libertarian Party, so the populist wing of the GOP is the correct choice.
Again, this really feels like the alt-right are a fifth column, dedicated to the destruction of the country by the mass support of establishment Democrats by black-pilling the dissident movement.
And it entrusted its future to Herschel Walker and Dr. Poz. Either it's been co-opted and subverted for a while, or its incompetent.
The notoriously tough on immigration libertarians?
No, that would be the GOP itself. It's been collecting votes while passing amnesties for nearly 40 years now. No one has come up with a reason why this time it will be different.
Those are 2 of Trump's specific picks in hoping that name recognition would work better than policy avocation. Most of the MAGA movement is operating under Bannon and MTG more than Trump. And that's just the MAGA movement, the populist movement even goes so far as to have subverted Ted Cruz into being an ally.
A libertarian solution to illegal immigration is to allow every single property owner to shoot trespassers to protect property with lethal force, as god intended.
Koch Brothers Corporatists aren't Libertarians, they are Corporatists / Fascists / Syndicalists at best.
That's the establishment. That's my point. Unlike in the UK, populists are seizing control over the party. Your narrative would make more sense in UK since there is basically no avenue of approach in the Conservative party which isn't covered by Leftist gatekeepers. That's why that party has to be fundamentally destroyed and replaced. The GOP is already being subverted, and doesn't have to be destroyed. It can if it needs to, but you don't detonate the bridge once you cross the river and secure a foothold.
Naturalized citizens from south of the border hate the idea of amnesty and most of them are conservatives, devout Catholics, who also hate the DP's catering to sexual deviants.
It's not automatic that latino immigrants will vote D just because they propose amnesty. If it was ever true, it's not anymore.
GOPe threw the election on purpose. It was also fortified...but they didn't even try. In fact they helped the opposition.
I feel like there's a name for that...
🌎 👨🚀 🔫 👨🚀