I'd need to see more than just this snippet but if true then are they treating capitalism like monarchy? Just because you're the child of a successful business man doesn't mean you inherit the company, more occasions they get a trustfund but the company is left in more capable hands.
To be clear: you are choosing not to make better, more useful contributions to this forum because other users have correctly identified an overlap between radical feminism and Jewish power/critical race theory.
This is one of the most interesting things you’ve posted in a while. I think you should continue in this vein.
You could always just publish the details under an alternate alias on someplace like Substack.
Believe me, if the information's as juicy as you claim, you'll have instant traffic from a wide range of people the moment anyone's become aware of its availability.
esg and "sustainability" is yet another thin coat of paint disguising the goals of marxism, just like every other "social movement" from the last 150 years or so
They are claiming that the CEO having a daughter is predictive of a higher Corporate Social Responsibility rating for the company.
Claiming this causation is certainly a step on the road to effectively punishing candidates who do not have a daughter.
The end goal is to make sure that the male candidates who are permitted to join the workforce are still highly compliant with and servile to the feminist agenda. If half of the workforce is to remain male, then it must be comprised of effete gays and soys.
I'd need to see more than just this snippet but if true then are they treating capitalism like monarchy? Just because you're the child of a successful business man doesn't mean you inherit the company, more occasions they get a trustfund but the company is left in more capable hands.
Figures, put all the real shit behind a pay wall, like any cult, pyramid scheme or actually useful information on tax avoidance
To be clear: you are choosing not to make better, more useful contributions to this forum because other users have correctly identified an overlap between radical feminism and Jewish power/critical race theory.
This is one of the most interesting things you’ve posted in a while. I think you should continue in this vein.
You could always just publish the details under an alternate alias on someplace like Substack.
Believe me, if the information's as juicy as you claim, you'll have instant traffic from a wide range of people the moment anyone's become aware of its availability.
Is there a direct link to the article? If anyone is able to find it on Google there may be a way to circumvent it.
Method didn't work, but I found this for anyone else that's interested: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X17302350 Which has a little more content that's not fully paywalled.
esg and "sustainability" is yet another thin coat of paint disguising the goals of marxism, just like every other "social movement" from the last 150 years or so
It never dies. They just rebrand it every decade or so, and all the retards keep buying in.
What if... and bear with me here.... what if my son was actually a daughter on paper so that I could get 9% more goypoints?
They are claiming that the CEO having a daughter is predictive of a higher Corporate Social Responsibility rating for the company.
Claiming this causation is certainly a step on the road to effectively punishing candidates who do not have a daughter.
The end goal is to make sure that the male candidates who are permitted to join the workforce are still highly compliant with and servile to the feminist agenda. If half of the workforce is to remain male, then it must be comprised of effete gays and soys.
And this is exactly why I'm sticking with MSG. It tastes way better.
/pol/ was right again.
I was better off not reading that thread.
You raise daughters to take care of you when you're old. Would you rather a man was your nurse?
Not necessarily. Childless CEOs also lack daughters.