So, ESG punishes CEOs for having sons?!
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Figures, put all the real shit behind a pay wall, like any cult, pyramid scheme or actually useful information on tax avoidance
I might try to get some books on ESG so I can post snippets here.
They paywall everything to make it harder to understand how it works, so it's harder to fight.
Thing is, investing in making better posts with this account is probably not worth it because of the stormcuck bots.
To be clear: you are choosing not to make better, more useful contributions to this forum because other users have correctly identified an overlap between radical feminism and Jewish power/critical race theory.
This is one of the most interesting things you’ve posted in a while. I think you should continue in this vein.
No, I'm choosing not to spend time and money researching for posts that will be heavily downvoted and not read by anyone.
Maybe I'll join Twitter. No downvotes on Elon's ego trip.
You could always just publish the details under an alternate alias on someplace like Substack.
Believe me, if the information's as juicy as you claim, you'll have instant traffic from a wide range of people the moment anyone's become aware of its availability.
Is there a direct link to the article? If anyone is able to find it on Google there may be a way to circumvent it.
This is the source that Bing claims the quote came from.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360739716_Do_female_CEOs_matter_for_ESG_scores
Method didn't work, but I found this for anyone else that's interested: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X17302350 Which has a little more content that's not fully paywalled.