Shitting on globohomo is worth the ban
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (65)
sorted by:
Well probably, haven't researched enough into it. I would probably say before 20th century it was probably less mental illness, more mutation as it existed in humans throughout history and in small groups/civilisations which suggests a genetic predisposition to it.
After 20th century, with more focus on social contagion and media influences, it's become a mental issue, the rise in trans alone is NOT organic.
No, it's the result of children being molested on an industrial scale.
I disagree. It's a social contagion that was started when leftists brought trans-sexuality under the "persecuted minority" umbrella, making it attractive to young people, especially girls, who thrive on social acceptance and strokes, who need that to feel as if they exist at all. Claiming to be a tranny confers automatic status on people otherwise anonymous and invisible like anyone else. They bypass the usual ways of gaining social recognition through accomplishment or success by joining the ranks of the persecuted. I don't think it's a mere coincidence that the explosion of the number of young people declaring themselves homo or trans coincides with the rise of social media, especially the horrorshows of TikTok and OnlyFans.
It's part of a larger social pathology created by neo-Marxist identity politics: the more we rail against the horror and insanity of this growing contagion the more validated they are in their persecution and the more demands they feel justified to make.
All you need to do to become a culture hero is either claim "alliance" or--to get the highest value of validation--take the plunge and go full tranny.
Except that researchers have spent the last 20 years looking for the “gay gene” and have come up empty.
Like why are some men left handed when right handed is better? Right handed men actually have more neurons specifically for the right hand than any other combination of hand/handedness/sex so it's clearly the intended handedness. Well there's 50 or so regions of DNA involved with most just biasing one way or the other. If society wanted only right handers it could take thousands generations to do that.
Probably the same type of thing with actual born gayness, a bunch of genes and hormones in some complicated process that's too hard to evolve into getting right all the time.
But it seems that's a tiny amount compared to the 'open-minded' guys that got jerked off and dopamine took over. It seems a huge number are just addicted to being gay and that's why they groom.
And yet we have an understanding of the various gene loci associated with handedness, as thin as it may seem. 25 years of looking for the "gay gene" has yielded no similar results. If we had it, it would be widely broadcasted. Also, at the end of the day if a genetic predisposition to homosexual behavior exists, it does not matter. It would still be disordered behavior. We don't consider schizophrenia to be a "mental orientation."
It could be something like if the mother had an adrenaline scare during a 1 day window or something - you're not going to find that ever until you have like perfect knowledge of biology.
It would be abnormal for sure.
They groom because they are always on the hunt for fresh meat. Homosexuals are ‘super predators’ as Hillary Clinton once said. You gotta get them young and impressionable and poison them for life.
Just me theory crafting how it turns up in seemingly unconnected cultures over the centuries, either that or a bigger mutation of dom/sub traits as what's more sub and dom than letting yourself be sexually by a guy? Just throwing theories out there.
The difference between "mutation" and "genetic ailment" (mental illness in this case) is academic at most, purely social at the norm.
A mutation that doesn't cause harm is a mutation. A mutation that does cause harm is a genetic-based ailment.
If you mutate that your arms are two inches shorter than they should be, it's a mutation. If you mutate that your arms are two feet shorter than they should be, it's a genetic ailment. Neck-down alopecia? Mutation. Neck-up alopecia? Ailment. Caved-in flat head? Fashionable and sexy to some points in history. Ailment now.
At a human population bottleneck, adult male homosexuality would be an ailment. At a surplus population, it's a mutation.
That stated, the mysterious "genetic component" has only spurious evidence at best. Taking a flight of CRISPR/MRNA shots or skinny dipping in a radiation coolant pool might alter your genetics, but it isn't going to alter your sexual preferences.
Thanks for the distinction, not a scientist so I'll use it in the future
It's not really a "scientist" distinction, because to proper true scientists, they're all mutations, no such thing as ailments, they don't make values judgements on their research: Is it the norm, or not the norm? (And they do not care whether "the norm" is good or bad).
It's more a linguistic difference.