It's not really a "scientist" distinction, because to proper true scientists, they're all mutations, no such thing as ailments, they don't make values judgements on their research: Is it the norm, or not the norm? (And they do not care whether "the norm" is good or bad).
Thanks for the distinction, not a scientist so I'll use it in the future
It's not really a "scientist" distinction, because to proper true scientists, they're all mutations, no such thing as ailments, they don't make values judgements on their research: Is it the norm, or not the norm? (And they do not care whether "the norm" is good or bad).
It's more a linguistic difference.