Next-level grooming: Berlin gets its first gay and lesbian day care center
(jungefreiheit-de.translate.goog)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
They're on a quest to make Weimar look based.
Rumors of Weimar degeneracy are grossly exaggerated. Weimar was "based". It criminalized homosexuality. The bureaucracy was full of hard-right monarchists and nationalists. Just because one or two neighborhoods in the capital city were filled with pedos and perverts (and what capital city doesn't have that), says as little as girls in short skirts in the Kabul of the 1970s.
they were having mother and child daughter prostitutes on the street the degeneracy was hardly "exaggerated" and there were gay and lesbian organizations and bars and the first transgender institution. .and Luigi Barzini's social memoir even talks about beastiality with a dead goose happening. And the inflation was so high that even barrels of money notes were practically worthless.And there were communist marches everywhere and of course Antifa
And what do you mean "what capital city doesnt have that?" dont act like its normal just cause it's a capital city. Nazis put a stop to all of it.
Where are you getting this from? Considering your record, I do have to check. Besides, how does this reflect on the authorities if they weren't approving of it? Child prostitution is unfortunately a thing everywhere.
It was illegal though, and the Weimar government refused to abolish laws against homosexuality despite an attempt by 'intellectuals'.
Make up your mind about whether the Peace of Versailles is to blame for it or the Weimar government. Of course, you hold this contradictory opinion for a very good reason, namely because you support what came after Weimar.
It is though. It's not good, but it is the norm.
What's the point of telling you anything if i know you wont change your mind either way? "The authorities didnt approve of it" so why is it they didnt get rid of it but the nazis could get rid of the problem? . They were controlled opposition
I assume you didn't make the argument to change my mind. I know a good deal more than the people who base their opinions on a random Twitter thread.
In what sense did the Nazis 'get rid' of homosexuality? They did the same thing that Weimar did before - namely prosecute the people doing it.
Who was controlled opposition? The Nazis? You almost got it right. They were brought in with the hope that they would be. But they turned out to be uncontrollable.
Like i said, There's no point in arguing with you cause i know you are not interested in any honest or open debate when it comes to this topic.
All of that just because you're wrong and can't prove your case?
We are living in clown world!!! Do you not want there to be healthy relationships between men and women that produce families? What depraved person even thinks of the his? I’m so glad I was born in 80 and it was rare that I ever heard about this stuff. I used to get annoyed about having to go to church so much growing up but I’m glad I did.
Well, we love what's bad for us and dislike what's good for us.
Of course there's a pro-pedo on the board. He also has connections to the Green party which has a history of pedophelia.
The German Green politician Daniel Cohn-Bendit, a major architect of the green movement in Europe and former co-president of Greens/EFA in the EU Parliament, abused children in a daycare. Germany also had a state program headed by Dr. Kentler that intentionally placed foster kids with pedos.
The left always claims to have been on "the right side of history", because all the changes that we now accept as having been good, they championed.
They don't tell you about all the bad stuff they championed that better people stopped.
That raises some obvious questions about who is responsible for propagating the idea that those things were good.
Not lynching people because they're black is pretty good, not?
That is the narrative, but it's highly questionable that people were lynched just for being black and many whites were lynched too. Normally, you'll find people were lynched for rape, murder, etc. Mob rule is inherently not a good thing; however, the current situation could hardly be called an improvement. American black people now kill twice as many black people every year than the KKK lynched in their entire history.
In the 1950s, every city with a large black population had a thriving black district. Something happened in the 60s, and by the 70s all those areas had been reduced to chaos and rubble.
I am aware. You weren't just lynched for "being black", but being black and being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Of course, more blacks are murdered now than under the height of lynching, so one may wonder if there is an improvement on that score. But being the victim of group persecution does damage beyond the raw numbers, which is why everyone tries to persuade client groups of such persecution.
(Honest to god, I wrote this before reading the rest of your reply.)
It is the race regime and the drug epidemic. But even if we dislike the outcomes insofar as they were disasters, surely we can believe that it is a good thing for a man not to be advantaged or disadvantaged on account of his color. Even if you believe that it is an impossible goal, which I'm unfortunately increasingly being persuaded of.
People are inherently advantaged and disadvantaged by their birth. I'm neither a seven foot giant nor a five foot manlet, so I'll never be an NBA star or a jockey in the Kentucky Derby. It's not skin color that is at issue; it is a complex host of inherited cognitive and behavioral differences. That's not to be taken to mean superiority or inferiority, simply different. Materialistic biology is not the ultimate arbiter either; there is an almost transcendent element to it as well. The biospirit of a people manifests in their society and culture, and people from outside that biospirit will be inherently disadvantaged, as it was not built by them.
Cohn-Bendit's name has been stuck in my mind ever since I read an article about him, back when he was still a MEP. The article said he used to be nicknamed "Danny the Red", and claimed it was because of his ginger hair. It was one of the first times I remember thinking "wow, that's complete horseshit" while reading the news. I was like 15 or so.
There's also a video of him somewhere, from the 70s or 80s, where he enthusiastically describes an "erotic game" he played with the little kids at the pedo daycare. I've seen it before but I can't find it now.
Looks like they're up to their old tricks with this new daycare.
And then one day, for no reason at all...
Daycare children will only have this on their mind if they are told to.
I'm surprised this hasn't happened already. We're talking about a country that had a government funded program that placed foster kids with known pedophiles to keep them from becoming "radicalized."
Like an all-you-can-rape buffet...
Hans, get ze luger
Well... russia can do europe a favor by destroying the globohomo and central banks.
Where's that old copy-pasta that highlighted how german government(s) deliberately placed children with pedophiles as some sort of experiment?
This isn't satire??
Sex ed in Germany is happening in grade 5 or 6 (don't recall).
This shit is for preschoolers (age 5).
Neither really. The purpose seems to be to bombard children with gay propaganda. Plus, judging by the board, to give pedos access to children. It's grooming.