“The ones objecting to depictions of children getting fucked are the real pedos!”
What a convenient state of affairs for pedos…
In reality, 99% of people will react to loli porn with visceral disgust. Most of them will probably want it banned from whatever social media platforms they use. Are 99% of people secretly pedos?
All this thread proves is that even pedos have the good sense to aggressively deny that they are pedos.
yeah, this argument is nigh retarded and i have ridiculous concerns about kia2 and its future health if posts like "kid porn is ok because it was drawn and not filmed" are actually celebrated.
but i also think all porn is abuse on the viewer no matter how it was made, so i probably already give a lot of reprobates here strokes with my unusual counter cultural opinions...
The point, numbnuts, is that even the "6 year old" is not a 6 year old, it's just a drawing. There is no child, no kid, there at all.
You can draw cartoons of hundreds of babies being decapitated, that doesn't make you a baby murderer. Because cartoons are not babies. Cartoons are not children. Cartoons cannot be victims.
“The ones objecting to depictions of children getting fucked are the real pedos!”
What a convenient state of affairs for pedos…
So, with this massive trove of examples in front of you, showing this very thing occurring again and again, just like the classic 'anti-gay preacher turns out to be closeted homosexual', you choose to simply handwave it away, because, in your mind, it's simply too 'convenient?'
You talk about 'depictions of children getting fucked', but that's not what they spend the majority of their time complaining about. When they say 'lolicon', they mean everything from Miss Kobayashi's Dragon Maid, to Konosuba.
I think what really drives their hatred of it is that they see people out there enjoying these milquetoast depictions of cutesy-sexy cartoon girls, and it fucking grinds their gears that all these people are just sitting there, openly enjoying something they have to keep secret, because they like the real thing.
Even when it comes to the literally pornographic lolicon hentai, we get this;
He's sitting there being an open pedophile, complaining that someone who defends cartoon loli gets all horrified when they see images of actual, real child abuse. He just can't wrap his twisted fuck head around the difference. It literally doesn't process in his deepfried pedo brain. He thinks they're a 'coward' for being disgusted by the real thing.
So every single person, which by the way is vast majority of people, who don't like loli shit is secretly a pedophile because people who are clearly sex pests to begin with try and use it to distract from their own deeds?
That doesn't really track. Maybe you've spent too much time on the internet, but you know that loli shit isn't really popular with most people right?
Maybe you've spent too much time on the internet, but you know that loli shit isn't really popular with most people right?
Maybe you've spent too much time on the internet, but you know that most people couldn't give a shit about drawings of people who don't exist?
I live in a country where cartoon loli porn is actually considered, against all logic, to be literal CP that will send you to jail and onto the sex offender's register for a picture of Misty getting eaten out by Lickitung. Most people in the country have no idea such an image would be illegal, because why would it be? ...But it is, despite the fact that you can just go straight onto twitter and see it right there, you can technically go to prison for it and have your life ruined and your family ripped apart over something that doesn't even exist and never even happened.
This. Is. Insane.
It is nothing less than expanding human rights to cartoon characters.
If you told the average person that you like looking at loli and explained it to them they'd look at you in disgust at best, punch you in the face normally and shoot you at worst
I live in a country where cartoon loli porn is actually considered, against all logic, to be literal CP that will send you to jail and onto the sex offender's register for a picture of Misty getting eaten out by Lickitung. Most people in the country have no idea such an image would be illegal, because why would it be?
Possibly most people in the country could not conceive that someone would be sick enough to draw something like that?
You're arguing that there is no reason to criminalize this, but why should it exist in the first place? What good does it serve, other than gratifying the fantasy of a person who can't cope with living in reality, and then sending them further down the hole?
You are using free speech as a shield, but free speech is a responsibility as well. I am allowed to call someone a filthy nigger-kike, but is that right? Is it good?
What is a good reason for someone to make porn, period, let alone porn depicting children in lewd acts with fantasy animals?
“The ones objecting to depictions of children getting fucked are the real pedos!”
What a convenient state of affairs for pedos…
In reality, 99% of people will react to loli porn with visceral disgust. Most of them will probably want it banned from whatever social media platforms they use. Are 99% of people secretly pedos?
All this thread proves is that even pedos have the good sense to aggressively deny that they are pedos.
arachnophobic, huh?
you must secretly want to fuck spiders
yeah, this argument is nigh retarded and i have ridiculous concerns about kia2 and its future health if posts like "kid porn is ok because it was drawn and not filmed" are actually celebrated.
but i also think all porn is abuse on the viewer no matter how it was made, so i probably already give a lot of reprobates here strokes with my unusual counter cultural opinions...
Too many lolbertarians have gotten in
It can't be "kid porn" when there are no kids involved you fucking goon
The point, numbnuts, is that even the "6 year old" is not a 6 year old, it's just a drawing. There is no child, no kid, there at all.
You can draw cartoons of hundreds of babies being decapitated, that doesn't make you a baby murderer. Because cartoons are not babies. Cartoons are not children. Cartoons cannot be victims.
You're straight-up psychopathic. And/or deeply retarded.
So, with this massive trove of examples in front of you, showing this very thing occurring again and again, just like the classic 'anti-gay preacher turns out to be closeted homosexual', you choose to simply handwave it away, because, in your mind, it's simply too 'convenient?'
You talk about 'depictions of children getting fucked', but that's not what they spend the majority of their time complaining about. When they say 'lolicon', they mean everything from Miss Kobayashi's Dragon Maid, to Konosuba.
I think what really drives their hatred of it is that they see people out there enjoying these milquetoast depictions of cutesy-sexy cartoon girls, and it fucking grinds their gears that all these people are just sitting there, openly enjoying something they have to keep secret, because they like the real thing.
Even when it comes to the literally pornographic lolicon hentai, we get this;
Look at this dude.
He's sitting there being an open pedophile, complaining that someone who defends cartoon loli gets all horrified when they see images of actual, real child abuse. He just can't wrap his twisted fuck head around the difference. It literally doesn't process in his deepfried pedo brain. He thinks they're a 'coward' for being disgusted by the real thing.
So every single person, which by the way is vast majority of people, who don't like loli shit is secretly a pedophile because people who are clearly sex pests to begin with try and use it to distract from their own deeds?
That doesn't really track. Maybe you've spent too much time on the internet, but you know that loli shit isn't really popular with most people right?
Maybe you've spent too much time on the internet, but you know that most people couldn't give a shit about drawings of people who don't exist?
I live in a country where cartoon loli porn is actually considered, against all logic, to be literal CP that will send you to jail and onto the sex offender's register for a picture of Misty getting eaten out by Lickitung. Most people in the country have no idea such an image would be illegal, because why would it be? ...But it is, despite the fact that you can just go straight onto twitter and see it right there, you can technically go to prison for it and have your life ruined and your family ripped apart over something that doesn't even exist and never even happened.
This. Is. Insane.
It is nothing less than expanding human rights to cartoon characters.
You're fucking retarded if you think normal people are cool with pokemon porn. Most people don't want to look at animals fucking humans.
If you told the average person that you like looking at loli and explained it to them they'd look at you in disgust at best, punch you in the face normally and shoot you at worst
Possibly most people in the country could not conceive that someone would be sick enough to draw something like that?
You're arguing that there is no reason to criminalize this, but why should it exist in the first place? What good does it serve, other than gratifying the fantasy of a person who can't cope with living in reality, and then sending them further down the hole?
You are using free speech as a shield, but free speech is a responsibility as well. I am allowed to call someone a filthy nigger-kike, but is that right? Is it good?
What is a good reason for someone to make porn, period, let alone porn depicting children in lewd acts with fantasy animals?
Reminds me of this https://ibb.co/BjRvXzM
I think there's an element of political tribalism at play here, too.
They know all of the actual kiddy diddlers vote left.
For real, is this supposed to be an own of people who oppose loli?