So every single person, which by the way is vast majority of people, who don't like loli shit is secretly a pedophile because people who are clearly sex pests to begin with try and use it to distract from their own deeds?
That doesn't really track. Maybe you've spent too much time on the internet, but you know that loli shit isn't really popular with most people right?
Maybe you've spent too much time on the internet, but you know that loli shit isn't really popular with most people right?
Maybe you've spent too much time on the internet, but you know that most people couldn't give a shit about drawings of people who don't exist?
I live in a country where cartoon loli porn is actually considered, against all logic, to be literal CP that will send you to jail and onto the sex offender's register for a picture of Misty getting eaten out by Lickitung. Most people in the country have no idea such an image would be illegal, because why would it be? ...But it is, despite the fact that you can just go straight onto twitter and see it right there, you can technically go to prison for it and have your life ruined and your family ripped apart over something that doesn't even exist and never even happened.
This. Is. Insane.
It is nothing less than expanding human rights to cartoon characters.
Holy fuck dude, you're delusional. Just because something isn't real doesn't mean the depiction of said thing doesn't disgust people. If you really think that an image of a pokemon fucking a human doesn't disgust most normal people you're insane.
When it comes to fiction, 'ew, gross' is subjective, and not an argument.
but whether or not I would feel guilty flaying those people's faces off with my own fingernails.
I would feel no guilt about mechanized nuclear holocaust of 99% of human life on earth if I knew guaranteed free speech absolutism was on the other side of it. What's your point?
If you told the average person that you like looking at loli and explained it to them they'd look at you in disgust at best, punch you in the face normally and shoot you at worst
We both know what I mean when I say loli dude. It's drawings specifically made to resemble the characteristics of children
Yeah I'm terminally online and not the neckbeard that thinks the average person will tolerate an open pedo. And thinks that any state allows a mag dump for simple assault lmao. Legal illiteracy and pedophilia go hand in hand.
I live in a country where cartoon loli porn is actually considered, against all logic, to be literal CP that will send you to jail and onto the sex offender's register for a picture of Misty getting eaten out by Lickitung. Most people in the country have no idea such an image would be illegal, because why would it be?
Possibly most people in the country could not conceive that someone would be sick enough to draw something like that?
You're arguing that there is no reason to criminalize this, but why should it exist in the first place? What good does it serve, other than gratifying the fantasy of a person who can't cope with living in reality, and then sending them further down the hole?
You are using free speech as a shield, but free speech is a responsibility as well. I am allowed to call someone a filthy nigger-kike, but is that right? Is it good?
What is a good reason for someone to make porn, period, let alone porn depicting children in lewd acts with fantasy animals?
Why should a government be able to tell you what shape you you can drag a pen around in? What shape you can piss on the floor in?
What good does it serve, other than gratifying the fantasy of a person who can't cope with living in reality, and then sending them further down the hole?
Total speculation. Playing violent videogames doesn't make people kill, why would stylized cartoons that barely look like actual children in the first place (note it's always anime style stuff, not realist western art) make people molest kids?
I've seen zero evidence to suggest anime is a gateway to child molestation.
You are using free speech as a shield, but free speech is a responsibility as well. I am allowed to call someone a filthy nigger-kike, but is that right? Is it good?
I'd fight a war to be allowed to call someone a nigger-kike.
What is a good reason for someone to make porn, period, let alone porn depicting children in lewd acts with fantasy animals?
Nothing less than the sovereignty of their own mind and the freedom to be left the fuck alone by the vile apparatus of the state. I draw no distinction between being told people cannot draw bart simpson fucking edna krabapple, and being told I cannot draw the prophet mohammed. I have no interest in either such thing - well, maybe mohammed - but just knowing that there's someone out there who thinks they have the fucking right to tell me I can't make a specific shape on a page fills with with unbridled fucking hatred. The fucking AUDACITY to believe you can control my mind!
So every single person, which by the way is vast majority of people, who don't like loli shit is secretly a pedophile because people who are clearly sex pests to begin with try and use it to distract from their own deeds?
That doesn't really track. Maybe you've spent too much time on the internet, but you know that loli shit isn't really popular with most people right?
Maybe you've spent too much time on the internet, but you know that most people couldn't give a shit about drawings of people who don't exist?
I live in a country where cartoon loli porn is actually considered, against all logic, to be literal CP that will send you to jail and onto the sex offender's register for a picture of Misty getting eaten out by Lickitung. Most people in the country have no idea such an image would be illegal, because why would it be? ...But it is, despite the fact that you can just go straight onto twitter and see it right there, you can technically go to prison for it and have your life ruined and your family ripped apart over something that doesn't even exist and never even happened.
This. Is. Insane.
It is nothing less than expanding human rights to cartoon characters.
You're fucking retarded if you think normal people are cool with pokemon porn. Most people don't want to look at animals fucking humans.
Pokemon aren't animals and not even misty is human. She's a cartoon.
Holy fuck dude, you're delusional. Just because something isn't real doesn't mean the depiction of said thing doesn't disgust people. If you really think that an image of a pokemon fucking a human doesn't disgust most normal people you're insane.
Getting back to this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNqtfFXq00k&t=0s
6.35 million views.
The core argument is freedom of speech.
When it comes to fiction, 'ew, gross' is subjective, and not an argument.
I would feel no guilt about mechanized nuclear holocaust of 99% of human life on earth if I knew guaranteed free speech absolutism was on the other side of it. What's your point?
If you told the average person that you like looking at loli and explained it to them they'd look at you in disgust at best, punch you in the face normally and shoot you at worst
Depends what you're calling 'loli', but for some of it yes, sure. So?
Tell me you're terminally online without telling me you're terminally online.
Punching someone in the face in most US states gives them the right to empty an entire magazine into your chest.
We both know what I mean when I say loli dude. It's drawings specifically made to resemble the characteristics of children
Yeah I'm terminally online and not the neckbeard that thinks the average person will tolerate an open pedo. And thinks that any state allows a mag dump for simple assault lmao. Legal illiteracy and pedophilia go hand in hand.
Possibly most people in the country could not conceive that someone would be sick enough to draw something like that?
You're arguing that there is no reason to criminalize this, but why should it exist in the first place? What good does it serve, other than gratifying the fantasy of a person who can't cope with living in reality, and then sending them further down the hole?
You are using free speech as a shield, but free speech is a responsibility as well. I am allowed to call someone a filthy nigger-kike, but is that right? Is it good?
What is a good reason for someone to make porn, period, let alone porn depicting children in lewd acts with fantasy animals?
Why should a government be able to tell you what shape you you can drag a pen around in? What shape you can piss on the floor in?
Total speculation. Playing violent videogames doesn't make people kill, why would stylized cartoons that barely look like actual children in the first place (note it's always anime style stuff, not realist western art) make people molest kids? I've seen zero evidence to suggest anime is a gateway to child molestation.
I'd fight a war to be allowed to call someone a nigger-kike.
Nothing less than the sovereignty of their own mind and the freedom to be left the fuck alone by the vile apparatus of the state. I draw no distinction between being told people cannot draw bart simpson fucking edna krabapple, and being told I cannot draw the prophet mohammed. I have no interest in either such thing - well, maybe mohammed - but just knowing that there's someone out there who thinks they have the fucking right to tell me I can't make a specific shape on a page fills with with unbridled fucking hatred. The fucking AUDACITY to believe you can control my mind!