This thing makes 23k a month by showing her butthole? Jesus simps, have higher standars. (Unless it's money funneled for her terrorist extracurriculars?)
I never understood simping, paypiggys I understand, it's more personal and they get off on tributing money like a sub bitch but simping? Fuck sakes guys, porn is literally free on the internet, yeah you can pay for it but you can't tell me you can't find something that'll get you off for free.
Bear in mind onlyfans is also a minor league money laundering service. They might not necessarily want the mediocre nudes so much as a means to redistribute money to terrorist causes in a relatively unaccountable way.
GA made a thread on her a year ago, they think it's money laundering. I don't know any OnlyFans trash, so I couldn't tell you if it's true. I guess look up some washed up ex pornstars and see what they make.
Should I do the research? I kind of don't want OF on my browser history. The only one I know is Belle Delphine, and that's because of the bath water stunt.
If she's using it specifically for political purposes, and people paying know this, then yes it's money laundering. Her showing her Wawa is just dressing. Maybe even shots of her putting more clothes on if she's ugly enough.
It’s fake. The “source” is also selling advertising for only fans. She could be making good money but you pretty much have to assume the dollar amount is at least slightly misrepresented.
I'll offer the contract up to the stormcucks then.
It's inalienable. It's yours. And in fact, since you have complained about divorce laws being lax, maybe that should be changed as well - so you won't be able to get out of it easily when you condemn others for it.
There's no such thing, unless you own a time machine. And even then it's blissful ignorance rather than real joy.
Real joy is complaining about women on the internet 24/7?
OnlyFans, in their financial reports as part of their case against BNY Mellon and JPMorgan Chase for threatening to cut all payments to them, claimed to pay out $3.7bn a year.
There's a lot of broken men being produced in the schools, and my feeling is that the teachers break them deliberately to make them easy for their sisters to exploit.
The supply of customers is effectively endless, at $10 a month, just one classroom of broken boys is worth at least $150 a month, and they run literally thousands.
I still believe that. MasterCard have cut off so many people for being against whatever politics they stand for.
No, not just for that. That's just the easiest one to put a number to. These broken men are being exploited in so many different ways, from therapists, to ill-advised marriages caused by their fear of being alone.
They're better at that than actually teaching, clearly.
I still believe that. MasterCard have cut off so many people for being against whatever politics they stand for.
And that makes it all the more funny. The idea of MasterCard trying to boost the profits of Onlyfans by hurting Pornhub is an idea only a guy predicting that 90% would die of the vaccine could take seriously.
These broken men are being exploited in so many different ways, from therapists, to ill-advised marriages caused by their fear of being alone.
You just said that it was for Onlyfans, but you do you. I guess even you realized it sounded ridiculous. Oh, and if it's "female teachers breaking boys into wanting marriage" is your explanation for marriage, was that previously the job of preachers and the community? How come those female teachers are doing such a worse job of it?
They're better at that than actually teaching, clearly.
Clearly not, considering the pittance that Onlyfans thots earn compared to GDP.
“We pay over 1 million creators over $300 million every month, and making sure that these funds get to creators involves using the banking sector,” according to Stokely. Because several banks have cut off OnlyFans from making wire transfers, that has made it difficult to pay creators, he said. BNY Mellon, JP Morgan Chase and Metro Bank each declined to comment, per the FT.
Stokely also said that OnlyFans is “fully compliant” with new Mastercard rules, so that had no bearing on the decision to ban porn. He also said the change was not made to appease investors.
Seems pretty clear what team Mastercard is on.
I knew there was an incident like this. It's when I bought my first BNY Mellon stock.
Secretive and sketchy. Judge for yourself whether that snout is jewish. The only family reference I've seen is that his grandfather had a 386 machine that he used to become a hacker.
I haven't seen any evidence that he is Jewish. It's hilarious to me that you don't know who he is. As much as you bitch about OF, you don't even know its history. You should learn it. It's very relevant to your claims about non-OF porn being good.
The site itself is irrelevant. If it didn't exist, there'd be someone else offering the same premise. Either that or women would find another way to do the same thing.
The issue with it is the psychological harm used to effectively groom kids into being the perfect simps that make women rich through it. OF is just a name. A brand. What the actual issue is, is way deeper than OF itself.
Peak Impy post here. I guess I shouldn't be surprised that someone who thinks Peggy McIntosh invented racial politics in the late 1980s doesn't care about history.
The reason to care is because it's not as if such a thing exists in a vacuum. Like I told you before, we didn't get from the social conservatism of the 1950s and earlier straight into OF. A lot of social and cultural changes had to take place to enable it to exist.
Actually, women were supportive of the NSDAP, because Jewish Influence theory protected them from accountability for their actions during the Weimar Republic.
A plurality of women voted for the Nazi Party in 1932, and in some regions, the majority of female votes went to the Nazis.
It's almost like their ideology was that of pathetic simps.
This thing makes 23k a month by showing her butthole? Jesus simps, have higher standars. (Unless it's money funneled for her terrorist extracurriculars?)
I never understood simping, paypiggys I understand, it's more personal and they get off on tributing money like a sub bitch but simping? Fuck sakes guys, porn is literally free on the internet, yeah you can pay for it but you can't tell me you can't find something that'll get you off for free.
Bear in mind onlyfans is also a minor league money laundering service. They might not necessarily want the mediocre nudes so much as a means to redistribute money to terrorist causes in a relatively unaccountable way.
Harder to get banned from Onlyfans for nudes than Patreon for antifa ringleadership.
Yeah... sexy video game and anime chars are the cause of sexism or misogyny.. not twitch thots or onlyfans. Nope. Nothing to see here.
They're just attacking the competition.
They don't want you seeing naked women without paying a woman directly at some point.
You think 'sexy video games' are competition for porn?
Anything with nudity is competition with women, and it's not one they come off favorably in.
Hoes mad they don't get free shit for being women and not contributing
(https://archive.ph/ty6wQ)[Proof of her earnings, from the article.]
https://greatawakening.win/p/12iNLRHoTT/antifa-girl-caught-laundering-mo/c/
GA made a thread on her a year ago, they think it's money laundering. I don't know any OnlyFans trash, so I couldn't tell you if it's true. I guess look up some washed up ex pornstars and see what they make.
Should I do the research? I kind of don't want OF on my browser history. The only one I know is Belle Delphine, and that's because of the bath water stunt.
If she's using it specifically for political purposes, and people paying know this, then yes it's money laundering. Her showing her Wawa is just dressing. Maybe even shots of her putting more clothes on if she's ugly enough.
It’s fake. The “source” is also selling advertising for only fans. She could be making good money but you pretty much have to assume the dollar amount is at least slightly misrepresented.
Wise choice, the wife would not appreciate that.
If I ever think about getting married, you have my permission to execute me.
I wouldn't do that. I wish you all the happiness of a good marriage.
I'll offer the contract up to the stormcucks then.
There's no such thing, unless you own a time machine. And even then it's blissful ignorance rather than real joy.
If you agree to go away I think storm"literal opposite of cucks" would be more than happy to send a wife pic or censored cert your way.
Nobody wants to see the land whale they married.
Imp I think your birth was God's way of taking the concept of irony and giving it a physical form for us to witness.
It's inalienable. It's yours. And in fact, since you have complained about divorce laws being lax, maybe that should be changed as well - so you won't be able to get out of it easily when you condemn others for it.
Real joy is complaining about women on the internet 24/7?
I meant the contract for killing me if I ever think about marriage seriously.
What I mean is that going back to the 50s would just be enveloping yourself in a delusion.
You will one day marry.
Certainly not the 50s, unless you mean the 1750s.
Wait, you're taking the word of a member of the 'Genocide Gender' who wants you dead and tortured? I thought you didn't trust them?
23k a month? wtf
How in the world do onlyfans make so much money. How many simps are out there
OnlyFans, in their financial reports as part of their case against BNY Mellon and JPMorgan Chase for threatening to cut all payments to them, claimed to pay out $3.7bn a year.
There's a lot of broken men being produced in the schools, and my feeling is that the teachers break them deliberately to make them easy for their sisters to exploit.
The supply of customers is effectively endless, at $10 a month, just one classroom of broken boys is worth at least $150 a month, and they run literally thousands.
It's your feeling that it's all a conspiracy? You don't say! Last time, you were claiming that MasterCard was cutting off Pornhub to benefit Onlyfans.
OK, so teachers are 'deliberately' breaking men to extract $3.7 billion a year from them? What is that as a percentage of GDP?
How good are they at their jobs?
I still believe that. MasterCard have cut off so many people for being against whatever politics they stand for.
No, not just for that. That's just the easiest one to put a number to. These broken men are being exploited in so many different ways, from therapists, to ill-advised marriages caused by their fear of being alone.
They're better at that than actually teaching, clearly.
And that makes it all the more funny. The idea of MasterCard trying to boost the profits of Onlyfans by hurting Pornhub is an idea only a guy predicting that 90% would die of the vaccine could take seriously.
You just said that it was for Onlyfans, but you do you. I guess even you realized it sounded ridiculous. Oh, and if it's "female teachers breaking boys into wanting marriage" is your explanation for marriage, was that previously the job of preachers and the community? How come those female teachers are doing such a worse job of it?
Clearly not, considering the pittance that Onlyfans thots earn compared to GDP.
Almost as ridiculous as cutting off people for wrongthink, which they actually did.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/visa-mastercard-cut-off-all-credit-card-donations-to-us-says-us-conservativ/
Also, the CEO of OnlyFans credited Mastercard as their ally when JPMorgan Chase tried to take them down in a Financial Times article.
No, I'm being consistent. Like I said, it's easy to put a figure on it if you consider the OF money, but there's so much more going on than just that.
Marriage shills are increasingly facing the setback known as reality. Even normie spaces are anti-marriage.
No, giant corporations trying to suppress their opponents is quite standard. Your pet theories are insane though.
Ah yes. So much more. How come only you have this great wisdom, while not being able to present any evidence for it?
You didn't answer why marriage rates are lower with "female teachers breaking young boys to seduce them into marriage" than before feminism.
Seems pretty clear what team Mastercard is on.
I knew there was an incident like this. It's when I bought my first BNY Mellon stock.
https://archive.ph/9ANGJ
Have you contacted the owners of OnlyFans to make them aware of this outrage?
It's quite unlikely for them to cut off someone who gets them $20,000 * 0.2 a month.
Are you implying someone other than the cam girl THOT gets a cut? How dare you!?
You mean the feminist CEO from my godawful birth country? I don't think anything good would come of that.
Not the CEO, the owners. Last I heard, Leonid Radvinsky owners most of its shares.
I don't even know who that is, but I'm going to guess he's Jewish, because it's you.
https://news.knowledia.com/US/en/articles/adminleo-onlyfans-owner-s-dubious-financial-history-209e5b0eedf1bb4fe6f488db507313f2319c05b7
https://forensicnews.net/adminleo-onlyfans-owners-dubious-financial-history/
Secretive and sketchy. Judge for yourself whether that snout is jewish. The only family reference I've seen is that his grandfather had a 386 machine that he used to become a hacker.
I haven't seen any evidence that he is Jewish. It's hilarious to me that you don't know who he is. As much as you bitch about OF, you don't even know its history. You should learn it. It's very relevant to your claims about non-OF porn being good.
Why would I care about the history.
The site itself is irrelevant. If it didn't exist, there'd be someone else offering the same premise. Either that or women would find another way to do the same thing.
The issue with it is the psychological harm used to effectively groom kids into being the perfect simps that make women rich through it. OF is just a name. A brand. What the actual issue is, is way deeper than OF itself.
Peak Impy post here. I guess I shouldn't be surprised that someone who thinks Peggy McIntosh invented racial politics in the late 1980s doesn't care about history.
The reason to care is because it's not as if such a thing exists in a vacuum. Like I told you before, we didn't get from the social conservatism of the 1950s and earlier straight into OF. A lot of social and cultural changes had to take place to enable it to exist.
That's not what I said, but go off.
Probably because we didn't have the internet in the 50s. Women exploiting men has existed for literal decades in various forms.
So again you don't want to actually do anything about a topic, you just want to keep complaining about it.
Either shit or get off the pot.
Antifa need not worry about the FBI
Actually, women were supportive of the NSDAP, because Jewish Influence theory protected them from accountability for their actions during the Weimar Republic.
A plurality of women voted for the Nazi Party in 1932, and in some regions, the majority of female votes went to the Nazis.
It's almost like their ideology was that of pathetic simps.
What actions?
Say what you want about the historical Nazis, they weren't "simps".
Mostly leaving their partners during the economic crash to become prostitutes and pimp out their own kids.
They absolutely were. They even had the bachelor taxes because everyone has to be with a woman or else.
I wonder what kind of evidence you would have. Regardless, what 'consequences' should women in general have received for that?
Imagine calling the people who conquered all of Europe 'simps'. I'm sorry, that makes you an idiot.
Mostly leaving their partners during the economic crash to become prostitutes and pimp out their own kids.
Footnotes please.