Secretive and sketchy. Judge for yourself whether that snout is jewish. The only family reference I've seen is that his grandfather had a 386 machine that he used to become a hacker.
I haven't seen any evidence that he is Jewish. It's hilarious to me that you don't know who he is. As much as you bitch about OF, you don't even know its history. You should learn it. It's very relevant to your claims about non-OF porn being good.
The site itself is irrelevant. If it didn't exist, there'd be someone else offering the same premise. Either that or women would find another way to do the same thing.
The issue with it is the psychological harm used to effectively groom kids into being the perfect simps that make women rich through it. OF is just a name. A brand. What the actual issue is, is way deeper than OF itself.
Peak Impy post here. I guess I shouldn't be surprised that someone who thinks Peggy McIntosh invented racial politics in the late 1980s doesn't care about history.
The reason to care is because it's not as if such a thing exists in a vacuum. Like I told you before, we didn't get from the social conservatism of the 1950s and earlier straight into OF. A lot of social and cultural changes had to take place to enable it to exist.
Not the CEO, the owners. Last I heard, Leonid Radvinsky owners most of its shares.
I don't even know who that is, but I'm going to guess he's Jewish, because it's you.
https://news.knowledia.com/US/en/articles/adminleo-onlyfans-owner-s-dubious-financial-history-209e5b0eedf1bb4fe6f488db507313f2319c05b7
https://forensicnews.net/adminleo-onlyfans-owners-dubious-financial-history/
Secretive and sketchy. Judge for yourself whether that snout is jewish. The only family reference I've seen is that his grandfather had a 386 machine that he used to become a hacker.
I haven't seen any evidence that he is Jewish. It's hilarious to me that you don't know who he is. As much as you bitch about OF, you don't even know its history. You should learn it. It's very relevant to your claims about non-OF porn being good.
Why would I care about the history.
The site itself is irrelevant. If it didn't exist, there'd be someone else offering the same premise. Either that or women would find another way to do the same thing.
The issue with it is the psychological harm used to effectively groom kids into being the perfect simps that make women rich through it. OF is just a name. A brand. What the actual issue is, is way deeper than OF itself.
Peak Impy post here. I guess I shouldn't be surprised that someone who thinks Peggy McIntosh invented racial politics in the late 1980s doesn't care about history.
The reason to care is because it's not as if such a thing exists in a vacuum. Like I told you before, we didn't get from the social conservatism of the 1950s and earlier straight into OF. A lot of social and cultural changes had to take place to enable it to exist.