I swear this isn't my alt account.

I recognize this post from Reddit, a long time ago. I should probably archive the links from it.

Feminist and University of Ottawa law professor Elizabeth Sheehy, wants to place battered women above the law. Professor Sheehy’s thesis is that battered women should have the right to kill their husbands pre-emptively — in their sleep, say, or when they least expect it — without fear of being charged with murder.

Which is what Coercive Control, which passed in the UK and Australia, actually is.

Man’s role is independence, woman’s is subjugation. This tracks across every biological and evolutionary biology argument. It tracks across the entire animal kingdom. Women will always seek subjugation over independence and men will always seek independence from subjugation. “Weak” men are really just societal girls that have been denied the ability to taste independence.

islam is right about women

As good as it is to have that longer explanation with several dozen sources, there's only one fact you need for explaining the fact that Feminism has always been shit. And that is that it's based around Conflict Theory. The commies were based around conflict theory. Nazi Germany was based around conflict theory. In fact, any authoritarian movement is almost certainly going to be based around conflict theory.

It's basically group Y is the root of all problems faced by group X. For Feminism, Y is men and X is women. For Communism, Y is the bourgeoise/rich and X is the proletariat. For Nazi Germany, Y is the Jews and X is the German People.

Patriarchy Theory is a core tenet of Feminism and reaches back to the original movements, and it's the theory that states men are the reason women have problems in the world. You cannot severe Feminism from Patriarchy Theory, as it's no longer Feminism without that basis for Feminist Theory.

Conflict Theory is one of the most manipulative methods out there, and it utilises victimhood as a form of currency while promising a better life. It absolves you of failures or hardships you face and puts the onus on someone else. Doesn't really matter who else, just someone else. It's how Leftists have operated for centuries. This time around, it's a multi-identity tactic: men, whites, straight, and "cis" are the villains, and the hardships face by anyone else isn't their own fault, it's "cis" straight white men who are to blame, and without them you would definitely would have succeeded in life. Doesn't amtter if there are countless examples to the contrary, because it's not meant to be rational, it's meant to make you feel better. Which is why so many that believe the broader umbrella of SocJus ideology are so often mentally ill.

Conflict Theory is the basis for all of it.

Great post

With women in charge.... i think we would never have great advancements or it would come at a much lower rate. Perhaps we would never created the wheel, discover antibiotics or launch shit into space. We would probably still be in the stone age.

Studies show that 80% of women are only interested in the top 20% of men and consider 80% of males as below average (woman logic) which lines perfectly with wanting to reducing the male population to 10% of humanity (80% reduction of 50% global population).