As far as I'm aware, every single signer of the constitution were in favor of obscenity laws. They didn't even think this was a question worthy of discussion.
The work around is saying there must be some artistic value to it. For awhile courts used to have to watch pornos and decide whether or not they had artistic value.
That might have flown if this was a story or documentary, but it's pure child exploitation for adults coached in such a way as to legally try and hide their target audience.
This is what happens when you let the French get too comfortable.
To apply Section 43.25 as broadly as Babin apparently does, will
criminalize not merely Cuties, but ... make felons out of
millions of Texans: every person who has streamed Cuties since its arrival on Netflix;
I took one look at the trailer and noped out of seeing for myself how degenerate it is. "Risky click" is an understatement.
Lucas Babin, the elected district attorney in Tyler County, Texas, indicted Netflix in September 2020, alleging that the film violates a state law against the “lewd exhibition” of children. The film portrays a children’s dance troupe, and sparked controversy in the U.S. after its release due to its suggestive choreography.
Netflix has sought to have the case thrown out, arguing that the statute violates the First Amendment.
What explicit definition of child pornography does Cuties fit into? Honest question. I find what little of it I've seen and heard described distasteful, but AFAIK no one is naked, so what's pornography?
Like everything else it will be a different set of rules for thee, muggle laws. So you're going to get popped for watching Naruto as a teen but they're free to be balls deep in a trafficked Ukrainian child.
Porn is not free speech.
As far as I'm aware, every single signer of the constitution were in favor of obscenity laws. They didn't even think this was a question worthy of discussion.
The work around is saying there must be some artistic value to it. For awhile courts used to have to watch pornos and decide whether or not they had artistic value.
Thus the lazy attempts at "story" or "plot".
Porn is free speech. Because you want to choose what is, and is not freedom or expression. Off to russia with you.
Apparently
That might have flown if this was a story or documentary, but it's pure child exploitation for adults coached in such a way as to legally try and hide their target audience.
This is what happens when you let the French get too comfortable.
Oddly enough, France has been pushing back against other facets of woke shit pretty hard lately, the duality of frog.
France is always one step forward and two steps back when they fight anything.
At this point if you still have a Netflix subscription I'm just going to assume you're a pedophile.
Netflix agrees:
I took one look at the trailer and noped out of seeing for myself how degenerate it is. "Risky click" is an understatement.
Yes
What's the lefts favourite line, freedom to speak, not from consequence?
Heh.
This is one of those cases where if it’s not explicitly illegal, it’s legal. That’s why it’s so important that Texas wins.
What explicit definition of child pornography does Cuties fit into? Honest question. I find what little of it I've seen and heard described distasteful, but AFAIK no one is naked, so what's pornography?
Lewd or sexual acts, with a minor.
And I don’t think you’re asking the question in good faith.
So which minors and which adult actors engaged in what acts?
Their lawyers and the Netflix employees pushing for this still deserve a short rope and a long drop.
Wait, if they legalize cp how do Epstein tapes will be of any use.... unless Vlad has them ...
Like everything else it will be a different set of rules for thee, muggle laws. So you're going to get popped for watching Naruto as a teen but they're free to be balls deep in a trafficked Ukrainian child.
Fuck netflix.