Young Global Leaders is a program that the WEF runs, and the people on that list are those that graduated the program.
The people listed on the WEF's main website seem to be people that have interacted with the WEF in some form, such as written articles or participated in one of the conferences, or being on the board of trustees. Not everyone on the list has to drink the kool-aid as much as others, but the forum's founding purpose has not changed.
No, it is inconsistent. To say you stand against tyranny but are not willing to take the measures and responsibility necessary to negate tyranny is logically incongruent.
I usually don't agree with you, but I'm always happy that you're willing to take unpopular stances. Groupthink is tiresome.
That said, the public need more guns, not fewer. Our "betters" should fear us. It keeps them in check.
States with the highest levels of gun ownership also have the lowest gun violence. States with the most aggressive anti-gun legislation overwhelmingly have the worst gun violence. Virtually all the gun violence is perpetrated by people who don't legally own guns, they're virtually all black, young, males, and members of gangs. There's your violence problem.
And what does it even matter if they have guns? "Gun violence" is such a stupid statistic. Yeah all the criminals and gangs would be friends and not commit crimes but the magic gun gave them the idea to be a criminal.
States with the highest levels of gun ownership also have the lowest gun violence. States with the most aggressive anti-gun legislation overwhelmingly have the worst gun violence.
Cause and causation are not the same for both of these examples. conservative states tend to support gun rights, and they have more weapons, they also tend to be more homogenous, so its not necessarily the guns that make it safe, but a combination of these factors. there would still be violence if those gang members had 'legal' guns, too.
I am aware of the link between loose gun laws and lower gun crime rates, and how even pro-gun control folks have to admit that.
The issue is that in some European countries, gun crime is already so low that it has no way to go but up in case of free gun ownership. At least, that is what I expect. If there were tons of guns, I'd agree with you.
School shootings became prominent because of gun laws not despite them. The second we said no one can be armed in places, those places became the highest targeted by an overwhelming margin that didn’t exist before.
That's not what I said though I bet you have quite a few instances where you've run afoul of even the Bill of Rights in your opinions.
The point is : if you want NPC like "We all agree on everything all the time", you'll find yourself quite alone quite quickly, and probably run afoul of your own standard given enough time.
That's what it means to have a purity test. It's basically SJW echo chambers.
That would be very difficult considering I’m not a member of government and the bill of rights are freedoms of the people that the government can not infringe. Have you tried actually reading the bill of rights?
How would it be difficult ? I'm sure you've wished a leftie here or there lose their freedom of speech or association or their protection from unlawful seizure at one time.
Why would anyone care what a gun grabbing hippy thinks? She would walk us up right up to the rope then cry as it is wrapped around our necks.
She's also a WEF "Young Global Leader"
Awww, Klaus' kids are growing up and stabbing each other in the back, just like real globalists.
https://www.weforum.org/people/vladimir-putin
Sometimes I feel the WEF just puts people on their list of "Young Global Leaders" to fuck with them.
Other times, you can see those that clearly drank the kool-aid, like Trudeau.
Young Global Leaders is a program that the WEF runs, and the people on that list are those that graduated the program.
The people listed on the WEF's main website seem to be people that have interacted with the WEF in some form, such as written articles or participated in one of the conferences, or being on the board of trustees. Not everyone on the list has to drink the kool-aid as much as others, but the forum's founding purpose has not changed.
You can't imagine someone having some good beliefs and some, in your opinion, bad beliefs?
That will probably disqualify the entire human population.
Hers are logically inconsistent, to an extreme.
I oppose the crackdown on the truckers, and I also don't want free gun ownership in my country.
But I'm European, and no one here wants free gun ownership.
Which is why you are inferior. Citizens unwilling to fight for themselves will not fight for each other.
Whether or not I am is not the point.
My point is that you have to understand that people can disagree with you without being 'bad' or inconsistent.
No, it is inconsistent. To say you stand against tyranny but are not willing to take the measures and responsibility necessary to negate tyranny is logically incongruent.
I usually don't agree with you, but I'm always happy that you're willing to take unpopular stances. Groupthink is tiresome.
That said, the public need more guns, not fewer. Our "betters" should fear us. It keeps them in check.
States with the highest levels of gun ownership also have the lowest gun violence. States with the most aggressive anti-gun legislation overwhelmingly have the worst gun violence. Virtually all the gun violence is perpetrated by people who don't legally own guns, they're virtually all black, young, males, and members of gangs. There's your violence problem.
And what does it even matter if they have guns? "Gun violence" is such a stupid statistic. Yeah all the criminals and gangs would be friends and not commit crimes but the magic gun gave them the idea to be a criminal.
Cause and causation are not the same for both of these examples. conservative states tend to support gun rights, and they have more weapons, they also tend to be more homogenous, so its not necessarily the guns that make it safe, but a combination of these factors. there would still be violence if those gang members had 'legal' guns, too.
I am aware of the link between loose gun laws and lower gun crime rates, and how even pro-gun control folks have to admit that.
The issue is that in some European countries, gun crime is already so low that it has no way to go but up in case of free gun ownership. At least, that is what I expect. If there were tons of guns, I'd agree with you.
Your loss. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Switzerland is in Europe last time I checked ?
School shootings became prominent because of gun laws not despite them. The second we said no one can be armed in places, those places became the highest targeted by an overwhelming margin that didn’t exist before.
Well if we cant agree on everything, then i guess yall should just give up. No crossover = no future country.
True, if she does anything that doesnt perfectly match up with our views, we should ignore her and tell to stfu.
Keep out the only remotely sensible democrat, that will save our country!
Most people who impose purity tests on others probably wouldn't even pass those purity test themselves.
Imagine saying follow the bill of rights is a purity test.
That's not what I said though I bet you have quite a few instances where you've run afoul of even the Bill of Rights in your opinions.
The point is : if you want NPC like "We all agree on everything all the time", you'll find yourself quite alone quite quickly, and probably run afoul of your own standard given enough time.
That's what it means to have a purity test. It's basically SJW echo chambers.
That would be very difficult considering I’m not a member of government and the bill of rights are freedoms of the people that the government can not infringe. Have you tried actually reading the bill of rights?
How would it be difficult ? I'm sure you've wished a leftie here or there lose their freedom of speech or association or their protection from unlawful seizure at one time.
I bet you don't pass your own purity test.
Tell me, are you white knighting because you’re retarded or just that much of a coward you would sell your born rights to simp?
Nicki Haley for Millennials.
She's CFR btw
She's part of the WEF, she can fuck right off with the rest of the globalists.
It actually is the political system in Canada. We are a parliamentary system.
Tulsi is one of Klaus Schwab's minions and is onboard with his "own nothing - eat bugs - live in a pod" agenda.
This is just empty virtue signalling/controlled opposition.
And once again I ask, who copied who. Trudeau copied Putin or Putin copied Trudeau.
Ps: I'm being facetious here.